The value of adaptivity based on cognitive style: An empirical study

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 95-106

  Triantafillou, Evangelos ^a   Pomportsis, Andreas ^b   Demetriadis, Stavros ^b   Georgiadou, Elissavet ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; EDUCATION COMPUTING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION; STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS;

FIELD DEPENDENT (FD) LEARNERS; FIELD INDEPENDENT (FI) LEARNERS;

HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS;

EID: 1442314791     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00371.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ayersman D J and Minden A V (1995) Individual differences, computers and instruction Computers in Human Behavior 11, 3-4, 371-390.
2. Brusilovsky P (1996) Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction 6, 87-129.
3. Carver C, Howard R and Lavelle E (1996) Enhancing student learning by incorporating learning styles into adaptive hypermedia EDMEDIA 96, 118-123.
4. Jonassen D H and Grabowski B L (1993) Handbook of individual differences, learning & instruction Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Jonassen D and Wang S (1993) Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext Journal of Computer-based Instruction 20, 1, 1-8.
6. Hsu T E, Frederick F J and Chung M L (1994) Effects of learner cognitive styles and metacognitive tools on information acquisition paths and learning in hyperspace environments (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373721).
7. Liu Y and Ginther D (1999) Cognitive styles and distance education On-line Journal of Distance Learning Administration 2, 3.
8. Meng K and Patty D (1991) Field-dependence and contextual organizers Journal of Educational Research 84, 3, 183-189.
9. Papanikolaou K, Grigoriadou M and Kornilakis H (2001) Instructional and interface design in an adaptive educational hypermedia system. Paper presented at Panhellenic Conference in Human-Computer Interaction (PC-HCI 2001), 7-9 December, Patra, Greece.
10. Riding R and Cheema I (1991) Cognitive styles - an overview and integration Educational Psychology 11, 3-4, 193-215.
11. Tessmer M (1993) Planning and conducting formative evaluations Kogan Page, London.
12. Toothaker L E (1993) Multiple comparisons procedures Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
13. Triantafillou E, Pomporstis A and Georgiadou E (2002) AES-CS: adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles in Brusilovsky P, Henze N and Millán E (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on adaptive systems for web-based education, held in conjunction with AH 2002 28 May, Malaga, Spain, 1-11.
14. Triantafillou E, Pomporstis A and Demetriadis S (2003) The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles Computers & Education (in press).
15. Williams M D (1993) A comprehensive review of learner-control: the role of learner characteristics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 13-17 January, New Orleans, LA.
16. Witkin H A Moore C A, Goodenough D R and Cox P W (1977) Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications Review of Educational Research 47, 1, 1-64.
17. Witkin H A, Ottman P K, Raskin E and Karp S A (1971) A manual for the embedded figures tests Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.
18. Yoon G S (1993) The effects of instructional control, cognitive style and prior knowledge on learning of computer-assisted instruction Journal of Educational Technology Systems 22, 4, 357-370.