Articulating the value-added dimension of np care

Nurse Practitioner

Volumn 28, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 34-40

  Barton, Amy J ^a   Baramee, Julaluk ^a   Sowers, Desree ^b   Robertson, Kathryn J ^b  

^a BURAPHA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Bach and Godofsky   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEWBORN; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 1442288862     PISSN: 03611817     EISSN: 15388662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006205-200312000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Scope of Practice Issues in the Delivery of Pediatric Health Care. Pediatrics 2003 111(2):426-435.
2. American Academy of Family Physicians. Policy Statement Concerning Nurse Practitioners 2002; Retrieved February 28, 2003 from
3. Moody NB, Smith PL, Glenn, LL: Client characteristics and practice patterns of nurse practitioners and physicians. The Nurse Practitioner 1999; 24(3):94-103.
4. Mundinger MO, Kane RL, Lenz ER, et al: Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: A randomized trial. JAMA 2000; 283(1): 59-68.
5. Hooker RS, McCaig LF: Use of physician assistants and nurse practitioners in primary care, 1995-1999. Health Affairs 2001; 20(4):231-238.
6. American Medical Association. Current procedural terminology CPT 2002; Chicago: AMA Press; 2001.
7. Marek KD, Jenkins M, Westra BL, et al: Implementation of a clinical information system in nurse-managed care. Can J Nurs Res. 1998; 30(1):37-44.
8. Yancey R, Given BA, White N, et al: Computerized documentation for a rural nursing intervention project. Comput Nurs 1998; 16:275-284.
9. Bowles KH: Patient problems and nurse interventions during acute care and discharge planning. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2000; 14(3):29.
10. Werley HH, Lang NM: Identification of the nursing minimum data set. New York: Springer; 1988.
11. Werley HH, Ryan P, Zorn CR: The Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS): a framework for the organization of nursing language In: ANA. An emerging framework: data system advances for clinical nursing practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1995, p. 21.
12. Martin KS: The Omaha System: Past, present, and future. On-line Journal of Nursing Informatics 1999; 3(1). Found at. Accessed October 29, 2003.
13. Coenen A, Marek KD, Lundeen SP: Using nursing diagnoses to explain utilization in a community nursing center. Res Nurs Health 1996; 19:441-445.
14. Bowles KH: Application of the Omaha System in acute care. Research in Nursing and Health Care 2000; 23(2):93-105.
15. Naylor MD, Bowles KH, Brooten D: Patient problems and advanced practice nurse interventions during transitional care. Pub Health Nurs 2000; 17(2):94-102.
16. Bednarz PK: The Omaha System: a model for describing school nurse case management. J Sch Nurs 1998; 14(3):24-30.
17. Martin KS, Scheet NJ: The Omaha System: applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992.
18. Monsen, KA, Martin, KS: Developing an outcomes management program in a public health department. Outcomes Management 2002; 6(2):62-66.
19. Martin KS, Scheet NJ: The Omaha System: A pocket guide. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992.
20. Martin, KS, Norris, J, Leak, GK: Psychometric analysis of the problem rating scale for outcomes. Outcomes Mgmt for Nurs Prac 1999; 3(1) 20-25.
21. Nies MA, Hein, L. Teleform: A blessing or burden? Pub Health Nurs 2000; 17(2):143-145.
22. Barton, AJ, Gilbert, L, Erickson, V, et al: A guide to assist nurse practitioners with standardized nursing language. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 2003; 21(3):128-133.
23. International Council of Nurses. Nursing’s Next Advance: An International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP): A Working Paper. Geneva, Switzerland; 1993.