Split-Ticket Voting: The Effects of Cognitive Madisonianism

Journal of Politics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 97-112

  Lewis Beck, Michael S ^a,c   Nadeau, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c Department of Political Science ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1442281874     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00143.x     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Alvarez, Michael, and Matthew M. Schousen. 1993. "Policy Moderation or Conflicting Expectations? Testing the Intentional Model of Split-Ticket Voting," American Politics Quarterly 21(4): 410-38.
3. Burden, Barry C., and David C. Kimball. 1998. "A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting." American Political Science Review 92(3): 533-44.
4. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
5. DeMaris, Alfred. 1992. Logit Modeling: Practical Applications, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-086. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
7. Fiorina, Morris P. 1988. "The Reagan Years: Turning to the Right or Groping Toward the Middle?" In The Resurgence of Conservatism in Anglo-American Democracies, eds. Barry Cooper, Allan Kornberg, and William Mishler. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 430-59.
8. Fiorina, Morris 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.
9. Grofman, Bernard, Willam Koetzle, Michael McDonald, and Thomas L. Brunell. 2000. "A New Look at Split-Ticket Outcomes for House and President: The Comparative Midpoints Model." Journal of Politics 62(1): 34-50.
10. Jacobson, Gary. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government. Boulder: Westview.
11. Lacy, Dean, and Philip Paolino. 1998. "Downsian Voting and the Separation of Powers." American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1180-99.
12. Ladd, Everett C. 1990. "Public Opinion and the 'Congress Problem.'" The Public Interest 100 (Summer): 57-67.
13. Layman, Geoffrey C., Thomas M. Carsey, and Barry S. Rundquist. 2001. "The Causes and Effects of Preferences for Party Government: A New Test of Policy Balancing." Paper delivered at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
14. Mebane, Walter R., Jr. 2000. "Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections." American Political Science Review 94(1): 37-57.
15. Menard, Scott. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Petersen, Trond. 1985. "A Comment on Presenting Results from Logit and Probit Models." American Sociological Review 50(1): 130-31.
17. Sigelman, Lee, Paul Wahlbeck, and Emmett Buell, Jr. 1997. "Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government: Lessons of 1992." American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 879-94.
18. Smith, Charles E., Robert D. Brown, John M. Bruce, and L. Marvin Overby. 1999. "Party Balancing and Voting for Congress in the 1996 National Election." American Journal of Political Science 43(3): 737-64.
19. Theil, Henri. 1970. "On the Estimation of Relationships Involving Qualitative Variables." American Journal of Sociology 76(1): 103-54.