Assessing the health implications for healthcare workers of regulatory changes eliminating locally developed occupational exposure limits in favor of TLVs: An evidence-based bipartite approach

International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 433-444

  Bigelow, Philip ^a,b,c   Moore, David ^c   Yassi, Amnalee ^a,c  

^a Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in British Columbia   (Canada)

^b Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

British Columbia; Occupational exposure limits; Regulatory policy; Threshold limit values

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID ETHYL ESTER; ENFLURANE; ETHYLENE OXIDE; FORMALDEHYDE; HALOTHANE; NITROUS OXIDE;

CANCER RISK; CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS; CYTOTOXICITY; EYE IRRITATION; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; LIVER TOXICITY; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NONHUMAN; NOSE IRRITATION; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; REVIEW;

EID: 14344264581     PISSN: 10773525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/oeh.2004.10.4.433     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Weisburger EK. History and background of the Threshold Limit Value Committee of the American Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Chem Health Safety. 2001;7:10-2.
2. Czerczak S, Indulski JA, Kowalski Z. Occupational exposure standards. Historical outline and present state. Pol J Occup Med Environ Health. 1993;6:1-18.
3. Sentes R. Occupational exposure standards in Canada: from ACGIH to? Am J Ind Med. 1989;16:719-22.
4. ACGIH. Statement of Position Regarding the TLVs® and BEIs®. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Worldwide. 〈http://www.acgih.org/TLV/PosStmt.htm〉. Accessed Sept, 2003.
5. Maidment SC. Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies. Ann Occup Hyg. 1998;42:391-400.
6. Perkins JL. Modern Industrial Hygiene. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1997.
7. Stijkel A, van Eijndhoven JC, Bal R. Drafting guidelines for occupational exposure to chemicals: the Dutch experience with the assessment of reproductive risks. Am J Ind Med. 1996;30:705-17.
8. McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Marano DE, Tarone R. A critical evaluation of the scientific basis of the MAK Commission's new general threshold limit values for dust. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001;74:303-14.
9. Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia. Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. Vancouver, BC, Canada: WCB of BC, 2002.
10. Vincent JH. International occupational exposure standards: a review and commentary. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998;59:729-42.
11. Norseth T. Exposure limits: an ethical dilemma. In: Upton Mehlman MA, Upton A, (eds). Advances in Modern Environmental Toxicology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific Publishing, 1994.
12. Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia. Discussion paper - review of occupational exposure limits ("OELs") and Designations. Vancouver, BC, Canada: WCB of BC, 2002.
13. Yassi A, Ostry AS, Spiegel J, Walsh G, de Boer HM. A collaborative evidence-based approach to making healthcare a healthier place to work. Hosp Q. 2002;5(3):70-8.
14. Breysse PA. ACGIH TLVs: a critical analysis of the documentation. Am J Ind Med. 1991;20:423-30.
15. Kennedy JG. Setting a threshold limit value (TLV): the process. Chem Health Safety. 2001;7:13-5.
16. Rappaport SM. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States. Am J Ind Med. 1993;23:683-94.
17. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 7th ed. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH Worldwide, 2001.
18. Roach SA, Rappaport SM. But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of threshold limit values. Am J Ind Med. 1990;17:727-53.
19. Spirtas R, Steinberg M, Wands RC, Weisburger EK. Identification and classification of carcinogens: procedures of the Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Value Committee, ACGIH. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1232-5.
20. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. 2002 TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH Worldwide, 2002.
21. Medline. U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. 〈http://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/download.html〉.
22. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Operations Manual - Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances Committee. ACGIH Worldwide. 〈http://www.acgih.org/TLV/OpsManual.pdf〉. Accessed Sept 2003
23. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Policy Statement on the Uses of TLVs and BEIs. ACGIH Worldwide. 〈http://www.acgih. org/TLV/PolicyStmt.htm〉. Accessed Sept 2003
24. Marasco A. Standards development: are you at risk? ASTM Standardization News. 2000;June:20-5.
25. Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Westpphal K. Occupational exposure to volatile anaesthetics: epidemiology and approaches to reducing the problem. CNS Drugs. 2001;15:197-215.
26. Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB). U.S. National Library of Medicine), National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. 〈http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ databases/download.html〉.
27. Sobaszek A, Hache JC, Frimat P, Akakpo V, Victoire G, Furon D. Working conditions and health effects of ethylene oxide exposure at hospital sterilization sites. J Occup Environ Med. 1999;41:492-9.
28. Wilkins DG, Valdez AS, Nagasawa PR, Gygi SP, Rollins DE. Incorporation of drugs for the treatment of substance abuse into pigmented and nonpigmented hair. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87:435-40.
29. Uematsu T, Nakashima M, Fujii M, et al. Measurement of 5-fluorouracil in scalp hair: a possible index of patient compliance with oral adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;50:109-13.
30. Hashiguchi M, Ohno K, Sakuma A, et al. A simplified method for detecting isoniazid compliance in patients receiving antituberculosis chemotherapy. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42:151-6.
31. Larson D. Cited in: Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB), Ethyl Acetate. U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services. 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. 〈http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search〉.
32. Beving H. Cited in Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB), Ethyl Acetate. U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. 〈http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search〉.
33. Vecchio D, Sasco AJ, Cann CI. Occupational risk in health care and research. Am J Ind Med. 2003;43:369-97.
34. Shaham J, Gurvich R, Kaufman Z. Sister chromatid exchange in pathology staff occupationally exposed to formaldehyde. Mutat Res. 2002;514:115-23.
35. Roy DR. Histology and pathology laboratories. Chemical hazard prevention and medical/health surveillance. Am Assoc Occup Health Nurs J. 1999;47:199-205.
36. Weaver VM. Chemical hazards in health care workers. Occup Med. 1997;12:655-67.
37. Gannon PF, Bright P, Campbell M, O'Hickey SP, Burge PS. Occupational asthma due to glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde in endoscopy and x ray departments. Thorax. 1995;50:156-9.
38. Rumchev KB, Spickett JT, Bulsara MK, Phillips MR, Stick SM. Domestic exposure to formaldehyde significandy increases the risk of asthma in young children. Eur Respir. J 2002;20:403-8.
39. Coggon D, et al. Extended follow-up of a cohort of British chemical workers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1608-15.
40. Hauptmann M, et al. Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies among workers in formaldehyde industries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1615-23.
41. Moore BL. Exposure of postoperative nurses to waste-anesthetic gases and factors influencing exposure. Acta Anaesth Scand. 1997;111 suppl:239-41.
42. Imbriani M, Ghittori S, Pezzagno G, Capodaglio E. Anesthetic in urine as biological index of exposure in operating-room personnel. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1995;46:249-60.
43. Imbriani M, Ghittori S, Zadra P, Imberti R. Biological monitoring of the occupational exposure to halothane (fluothane) in operating room personnel. Am J Ind Med. 1991;20:103-12.
44. Sitarek K, Wesolowski W, Kucharska M, Celichowski G. Concentrations of anaesthetic gases in hospital operating theatres. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2000;13:61-6.
45. Henderson KA, Matthews IP. Staff exposure to anaesthetic gases in theatre and non theatre areas. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000;17:149-51.
46. Bruce DL, Eide KA, Linde HW, Eckenhoff JE. Causes of death among anesthesiologists: a 20-year survey. Anesthesiology. 1968;29:565-9.
47. Corbett TH, Cornell RG, Lieding K, Endres JL. Incidence of cancer among Michigan nurse-anesthetists. Anesthesiology. 1973;38:260-3.
48. Milliken RA. A plea for monitoring both halogenated and non-halogenated anesthetic agents in the operating room. Anesthesiol Rev. 1976;3:29-31.
49. Spence AA, Cohen EN, Brown BW Jr, Knill-Jones RP, Himmelberger DU. Occupational hazards for operating room-based physicians. Analysis of data from the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA. 1977;238:955-9.
50. Rosenberg PH, Vanttinen H. Occupational hazards to reproduction and health in anaesthetists and paediatricians. Acta Anaesth Scand. 1978;22:202-7.
51. Spence AA. Environmental pollution by inhalation anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59:96-103.
52. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission - Australia. Halothane. In: Australian National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (ed). Exposure Standards: Commonwealth of Australia, 1990.
53. Cohen EN, Gift HC, Brown BW, et al. Occupational disease in dentistry and chronic exposure to trace anesthetic gases. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;101:21-31.
54. Smith G, Shirley AW. Failure to demonstrate effect of trace concentrations of nitrous oxide and halothane on psychomotor performance. Br J Anaesth. 1977;49:65-70.
55. U.K. Health and Safety Commission. Discussion Document on Occupational Exposure Limits. London, U.K., U.K. Health and Safety Executive, 2002.
56. Workers' Compensation Board of Columbia. Proposed Policy Amendments: Chemical and Biological Substances- Exposure Limits and Designations. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia, 2003.