Conveying three-dimensional shape with texture

Proceedings - 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, APGV 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 119-122

  Kim, Sunghee ^a   Hagh Shenas, Haleh ^a   Interrante, Victoria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Principal Directions; Shape Perception; Shape Representation; Texture

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER VISION; DATA REDUCTION; GEODESY; LUMINESCENCE; OBJECT RECOGNITION; TEXTURES;

PRINCIPAL DIRECTIONS; SHAPE PERCEPTION; SHAPE REPRESENTATION; TEXTURE;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 14344252376     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1012551.1012572     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. ERENS, R., KAPPERS, A., AND KOENDERINK, J. 1993. Perception of local shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics 54, 2, 145-156.
2. GIBSON, J. 1950. The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology 63, 367-384.
3. INTERRANTE, V., AND KIM, S. 2001. Investigating the effect of texture orientation on shape perception. In Proceedings of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI, SPIE 4200, 330-339.
4. INTERRANTE, V., FUCHS, H., AND PIZER, S. 1997. Conveying the 3d shape of smoothly curving transparent surfaces via texture. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 3, 2, 98-117.
5. KNILL, D. 2001. Contour into texture: The information content of surface contours and texture flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A 18, 1, 12-35.
6. KOENDERINK, J., VAN DOORN, A., AND KAPPERS, A. 1992. Surface perception in pictures. Perception 52, 487-496.
7. LEVOY, M. 1988. Display of surfaces in volume data. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 8, 3, 29-37.
8. LI, A., AND ZAIDI, Q. 2000. Perception of three-dimensional shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy. Vision Research 40, 217-242.
9. LI, A., AND ZAIDI, Q. 2001. Information limitations in perception of shape from texture. Vision Research 41, 1519-1534.
10. LORENSEN, W., AND CLINE, H. 1988. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 163-169.
11. MAMASSIAN, P., AND KERSTEN, D. 1996. Illumination, shading and perception of local orientation. Vision Research 36, 15, 2351-2367.
12. MAMASSIAN, P., AND LANDY, M. 1998. Observer biases in the 3d interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research 38, 2817-2832.
13. OLIVEIRA, M. M., G., B., AND D., M. 2000. Relief texture mapping. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, 359-368.
14. STALLING, D., AND HEGE, H.-C. 1995. Fast and resolution independent line integral convolution. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 249-256.
15. STEVENS, K. 1983. The line of curvature constraint and the interpretation of 3d shape from parallel surface contours. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1057-1061.
16. TODD, J., AND REICHEL, F. 1990. Visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from double-projected contour patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16, 3, 665-674.
17. WITKIN, A. 1981. Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 17, 17-45.
18. ZAIDI, Q., AND Li, A. 2002. Limitations on shape information provided by texture cues. Vision Research 42, 815-835.