A feasibility test for perceptually adaptive level of detail rendering on desktop systems

Proceedings - 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, APGV 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 49-56

  Parkhurst, Derrick ^a   Niebur, Ernst ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gaze Contingent; Velocity dependent; Visual Search

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; OBJECT RECOGNITION; ONLINE SEARCHING; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT; VISUALIZATION;

DESKTOP SYSTEMS; DETAIL RENDERING; GAZE-CONTINGENT; LEVEL OF DETAIL (LOD); VELOCITY-DEPENDENT; VISUAL SEARCH;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 14344251406     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1012551.1012561     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. BROWN, R., COOPER, L., AND PHAM, B. 2003. Visual attention-based polygon level of detail management. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Austalasia and South East Asia, ACM Press, 55-62.
2. BURR, D. C., AND Ross, J. 1982. Contrast sensitivity at high velocities. Vision Research 22, 479-484.
3. CLARK, J. H. 1976. Heirarchical geometric models for visible surface algorithms. Communications of the ACM 19(10), 547-554.
4. CRUZ-NEIRA, C., SANDIN, D. J., AND DEFANTI, T. A. 1993. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the cave. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press, 135-142.
5. DANFORTH, R., DUCHOWSKI, A. T., GEIST, R., AND MCALILEY, E. 2000. A platform for gaze-contingent virtual environments. In Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Smart Graphics Symposium, AAAI press, vol. 4, 66-70.
6. DUNCAN, J., AND HUMPHREYS, G. 1989. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96, 433-458.
7. EGETH, H., VIRZI, R., AND GARBART, H. 1984. Searching for conjunctively defined targets. J. Experimental Psychology 10, 1, 32-39.
8. FUNKHOUSER, T., AND SEQUIN, C. H. 1993. Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'93 proceedings), ACM, vol. 27, 247-254.
9. HOPPE, H., DEROSE, T., DUCHAMP, T. MCDONALD, J., AND STUETZLE, W. 1993. Mesh optimization. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'93), ACM press, New York,NY, 19-26.
10. HOPPE, H. 1997. View-dependent refinement of progressive meshes. In Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH'97), ACM press, New York,NY, 189-198.
11. LEVOY, M., AND WHITAKER, R. 1990. Gaze-directed volume rendering. In Proceedings of the 1990 symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, ACM, 217-223.
12. LINDSTROM, P., AND TURK, G. 2000. Image-driven simplification. ACM Trans. Graph. 19, 3, 204-241.
13. LUEBKE, D., AND ERIKSON, C. 1997. View-dependent simplification of arbitrary polygonal environments. In Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH'97 proceedings), ACM, 199-208.
14. LUEBKE, D., AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, 223-234.
15. LUEBKE, D., HALLEN, B., NEWFIELD, D., AND WATSON, B. 2000. Perceptually driven simplification using gaze-directed rendering. University of Virginia Technical Report CS-2000-04.
16. MURPHY, H., AND DUCHOWSKI, A. T. 2001. Gaze-contingent level of detail rendering. In EuroGraphics 2001, EuroGraphics Association.
17. MURPHY, B. J. 1978. Pattern thresholds for moving and stationary gratings. Vision Research 18, 521-530.
18. OHSHIMA, T., YAMAMOTO, H., AND TAMURA, H. 1996. Gaze-directed adaptive rendering for interacting with virtual space. In VRAIS'92, vol. 26(2), 103-110.
19. O'SULLIVAN, C., AND DINGLIANA, J. 2001. Collisions and perception. ACM Trans. Graph. 20, 3, 151-168.
20. PARKHURST, D., AND NIEBUR, E. 2002. Variable resolution displays: a theoretical, practical and behavioral evaluation. Human Factors 44, 4, 611-29.
21. PAUSCH, R., PROFFITT, D., AND WILLIAMS, G. 1997. Quantifying immersion in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 13-18.
22. REDDY, M. 1994. Reducing lags in virtual reality systems using motion-sensitive level of detail. In Proceedings of the 2nd UK VR-SIG Conference, 25-31.
23. REDDY, M. 1997. Specification and evaluation of level of detail selection criteria. Virtual Reality: Research, Development and Applications 3(2), 132-143.
24. REDDY, M. 2001. Perceptually optimized 3d graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21(5), 68-75.
25. SCH̀ROEDER, W. J., ZARGE, J. A., AND LORENSEN, W. E. 1992. Decimation of triangle meshes. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'92), vol. 26(2), 65-70.
26. STAMPE, D. M. 1993. Heuristic filtering and reliable calibration methods for video-based pupil-tracking systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25, 2, 137-142.
27. TURK, G. 1992. Re-tiling polygonal surfaces. In Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press, 55-64.
28. VIRSU, V., AND ROVAMO, J. 1979. Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research 37, 3, 475-494.
29. WATSON, B., WALKER, N., HODGES, L. F., AND WORDEN, A. 1997. Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: effects on search performance with a head-mounted display. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 4, 4, 323-346.
30. WATSON, B., WALKER, N., RIBARSKY, W., AND SPAULDING, V. 1998. Effects of variation in system responsiveness on user performance in virtual environments. Human Factors 40(3), 403-414.
31. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2000. Using naming time to evaluate quality predictors for model simplification. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, 113-120.
32. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press, 213-220.
33. WILLIAMS, N., LUEBKE, D., COHEN, J. D., KELLEY, M., AND SCHUBERT, B. 2003. Perceptually guided simplification of lit, textured meshes. In Proceedings of the 2003 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, ACM Press, 113-121.
34. XIA, J. C., EL-SANA, J., AND VARSHNEY, A. 1997. Adaptive real-time level-of-detail-based rendering for polygonal models. IEEE Transactions on Visual. Comput. Graph. 3(2), 171-183.
35. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics 20, 1, 39-65.