Using naming time to evaluate quality predictors for model simplification

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 113-120

  Watson, Benjamin ^a   Friedman, Alinda ^a   McGaffey, Aaron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Human vision; Image quality; Model simplification; Naming time; Simplification metrics

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN VISION; MODEL SIMPLIFICATION; NAMING TIME; SIMPLIFICATION ALGORITHMS; SIMPLIFICATION METRICS; VIEW-DEPENDENT;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; IMAGE QUALITY; ALGORITHMS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DATA STRUCTURES; HEURISTIC METHODS; IMAGE COMPRESSION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

QUALITY CONTROL; IMAGE QUALITY;

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; MODEL SIMPLIFICATION; QUALITY PREDICTORS; SIMPLIFICATION ALGORITHMS;

EID: 0033700826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/332040.332414     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bartram, D.J. (1976). Levels of coding in picture- picture comparison tasks. Memory and Cognition, 4, 593-602.
2. Baxes, G. (1994). Digital Image Processing. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
3. Bolin, M. & Meyer, G. (1998). A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. Proc. of SIGGRAPH 98. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 1998, ACM SIGGRAPH, 299-309.
4. Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C. & Scopigno, R. (1998). Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum, 17, 2, 167-174. Available at: http://vcg.iei.pi.cnr.it/metro.html.
5. Cohen, J., Varshney, A., Manocha, D., Turk, G., Weber, H., Agarwal, P., Brooks, F. & Wright, W. (1996). Simplification envelopes. Proc. of SIGGRAPH 96. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 119-128.
6. Cosman, P., Gray, R. & Olshen, R. (1993). Evaluating quality of compressed medical images: SNR, subjective rating and diagnostic accuracy. Proc. IEEE, 82, 6, 919-932.
7. Daly, S. (1993). The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Watson, A. B. (ed.). Digital Images and Human Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 179-206.
8. DeRose, T., Kass, M. & Truong, T. (1998). Subdivision surfaces in character animation. Proc. of SIGGRAPH 98. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 85-94.
9. Friedman, A., & Rabiau, M. (1999). Lions and tigers and bears: The role of structural similarity and visual detail in naming disoriented objects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. Friedman, A., & Vuong, Q. (1999). Cats, cows, cameras, and cars: The role of structural similarity in naming and categorizing upright and disoriented pictures. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Gaffen, D., & Heywood, C.A. (1993). A spurious category-specific visual agnosia for living things in normal human and nonhuman primates. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 118-128.
12. Garland, M. & Heckbert, P. (1997). Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. Proc. SIGGRAPH 97. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 209-216. Available at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~garland/quadrics/qslim.html.
13. Girod, B. (1993). What's wrong with mean-squared error? In Watson, A. B. (ed.). Digital Images and Human Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 207-220.
14. Heckbert, P. & Garland, M. (1997) Survey of polygonal surface simplification algorithms. Technical report, CS Dept., Carnegie Mellon, U. Available at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~garland/papers/simp.pdf.
15. Hinker, P. & Hansen, C. (1993). Geometric optimization. Proc. IEEE Visualization '93, 189-195.
16. Humphreys, G. W., Lamote, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1995). An interactive activation approach to object processing: Effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology. Memory, 3, 535-586.
17. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlin, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
18. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
19. Jolicoeur, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461 -478.
20. Jolicoeur, P., & Milliken, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: earning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 200-210.
21. Leubke,D. & Erikson, C. (1997). View dependent simplification of arbitrary polygonal environments. Proc. of SIGGRAPH 97. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 199-208.
22. Lindstrom, P., Koller, D., Ribarsky, W., Hodges, L., Faust, N., & Turner, G. (1996). Proc. of SIGGRAPH 96. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 109-118.
23. Lubin,J. (1993). A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In Peli, E. (ed.). Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, World Scientific, New Jersey, 245-283.
24. Martens, W. & Myszkowski, K. (1993). Psycho- physical validation of the visible differences predictor for global illumination applications. IEEE Visualzation '93, Late Breaking Topics, 49-52. Also available at: http://wwwsvl.u-aizu.ac.jp/labs/csel/vdp/.
25. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddelay (Eds.), Attention & Performance IX, Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 135-151.
26. Ramasubramanian, M., Pattanaik, S. & Greenberg, D. (1999). A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. Proc. of SIGGRAPH 99. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 73-82.
27. Reddy, M. (1998). Specification and evaluation of level of detail selection criteria. Virtual Reality: Research, Development and Application, 3, 2, 132-143.
28. Rossignac, J. & Borrel, P. (1993). Multi resolution 3D approximations for rendering complex scenes. In Falcidieno, B. & Kunii, T. (eds.), Geometric Modeling in Computer Graphics. Springer Verlag, 455-465.
29. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory:an integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206-217.
30. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
31. Turk, G. (1992). Re-tiling polygonal surfaces. Proc. of SIGGRAPH 92. In Computer Graphics, 26, 2 (July), ACM SIGGRAPH, 55-64.
32. Turk, G. & Levoy, M. (1994). Zippered polygon meshes from range images. Proc. of SIGGRAPH 94. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 311-318.
33. Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrell, L. (1995). Sources of name disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 822-848.
34. Watson, B., Walker, N., Hodges, L. & Worden, A. (1997). Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: effects on search performance with a head- mounted display. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 4, 4, 323-346.