Applicability of leaf morphology and intersimple sequence repeat markers in classification of tree peony (paeoniaceae) cultivars

HortScience

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 329-334

  Suo, Zhi Li ^a   Li, Wen Ying ^b   Yao, Juan ^a   Zhang, Hui Jin ^a   Zhang, Zhi Ming ^a   Zhao, Di Xuan ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY   (China)

^c Yutian Tree Peony Nursery ^*  (China)

Author keywords

Cultivar identification; Intersimple sequence repeat marker; ISSR; Leaf morphology; Paeonia suffruticosa

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MORPHOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY); PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

FLOWER CHARACTERISTICS; INTERSIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEATS (ISSR) ANALYSIS; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; TREE PEONY CULTIVARS;

FORESTRY;

ENVIRONMENTS; FLOWERS; FOLIAR ANALYSIS; FORESTS; PLANTS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; VARIETIES;

PAEONIA SUFFRUTICOSA; PAEONIACEAE;

EID: 14344249943     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.40.2.329     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Chen, D.M. and Y.J. Ding. 1992. Appraisal system on main character forpeony varieties. Acta Agr. Universitis Henanensis 26(2):187-193.
2. Chen, X.M., G.S. Zheng, and L. Meng. 2002. RAPD-PCR analysis of genetic diversity of different colour 35 tree Paeonia cultivars. Scientai Ag. Sinica 35:546-551.
3. Chen, X.M., G.S. Zheng, and S.W. Zhang. 2001. RAPD analysis of tree peony cultivars. Acta Hort. Sinica 28(4):370-372.
4. Doyle, J.J. and J.L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bul. 19:11-15.
5. Ge, S., M.X. Wang, and Y.W. Chen. 1988. An analysis of population genetic structure of mason pine by isozyme technique. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 24(4):399-409.
6. Godwin, I.D., E.A.B. Aitken, and L.W. Smith. 1997. Application of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers to plant genetics. Electrophoresis 18:1524-1528.
7. Hamada, M, T. Hosoki, and K. Inaba. 1989. Morphological peony cultivars classification based on multivariate analysis. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58(3):697-704.
8. Harding, A. 1993. The peony. Sagapress, Inc.-Timber Press, Inc., Portland, Ore.
9. Haw, S.G. and L.A. Lauener. 1990. A review of the intraspecific taxa of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. Edingb. J. Bot. 47(3):273-281.
10. Hong, D.Y. and K.Y. Pan. 1999. A revision of the Paeonia suffruticosa complex (Paeoniaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 19:289-299.
11. Hosoki, T., D. Kimura, R. Hasegawa, T. Nagasako, K. Nishimoto, K. Ohta, M. Sugiyama, and K. Haruki. 1997. Comparative study of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) cultivars and hybrids by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 66(2):393-400.
12. Kessenich, G.M. 1990. The American hybrid peony. Amer. Peony Soc., Hopkins, Minn.
13. Li, J.J. 1999. Chinese tree peony and herbaceous peony. China For. Publ. House, Beijing.
14. Li, M.X. and X.F. Zhang. 1982. A cytogenetic observation on triploid Paeonia suffruticosa. Hereditas (Beijing) 4(5):19-21.
15. Pei, Y.L., Y. Zou, Z. Yin, X.Q. Wang, Z.X. Zhang, and D.Y. Hong. 1995. Preliminary report of RAPD analysis in Paeonia suffruticosa Subsp. spontanea and Paeonia rockii. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 33(4):350-356.
16. Persson, H.A., K. Rumpunen, and L.K. Mollerstedt. 2000. Identification of culinary rhubarb (Rheum spp.) cultivars using morphological characterization and RAPD markers. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 75(6):684-689.
17. Rohlf, F.J. 1997. NTSYSpc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. version 2.02a. Appl. Biostatistics, New York.
18. Roldán-Ruiz, I., F.A.V. Eeuwijk, T.J. Gilliland, P. Dubreuil, C. Dillmann, J. Lallemand, M.D. Loose, and C.P. Baril. 2001. A comparative study of morphological methods of describing relationship between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1138-1150.
19. Rumpunen, K. and I.V. Bartish. 2002. Comparison of differentiation estimates based on morphometric and molecular data, exemplified by various leaf shape descriptors and RAPDs in the genus Chaenomeles (Rosaceae). Taxon 51:69-82.
20. Sang, T., D.J. Crawford, and T.F. Stuessy. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84:1120-1136
21. Stern, F.C. 1946. A Study of the Genus Paeonia. Royal Hort. Soc., London.
22. Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
23. Wang, L.Y. 1998. Chinese tree peony (English ed.). China For. Publ. House, Beijing.
24. Wang, X.D., Z.P. Wang, and Y.P. Zou. 1996. An improved procedure for nuclear DNA isolation from silica-gel dried leaves of wild grapevine. Plant Mol. Biol. Rpt. 14(4):369-373.
25. Yu, H. 1998. The tree peony. Shanghai Science & Technology Press, Shanghai.
26. Yu, H. and N.C. Yang. 1962. Evolution and formation of Chinese tree peony cultivars. Acta Hort. Sinica 1-2:175-186.
27. Yuan, T., and L.Y. Wang. 2003. Morphological studies on Paeonia sect. Moutan subsect. Vaginatae in China. Acta Hort. Sinica 30:187-191.
28. Zhou, J.Q. 1962. An approach on flower form classification of tree peony and peony cultivars. Acta Hort. Sinica 1-3-4:351-360.
29. Zhou, ZQ., K. Y. Pan, and D.Y. Hong. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses of Paeonia section Moutan (tree peonies, Paeoniaceae) based on morphological data. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 42(5):436-446.
30. Zou, Y.P., M.L. Cai, and Z.P. Wang. 1999. Systematic studies on Paeonia sect. Moutan DC. based on RAPD analysis. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 37:220-227.