Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: Evaluation of panoramic radiographs

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 323-328

  Dutra, Vinicius ^a,b   Yang, J ^a   Devlin, H ^c   Susin, C ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Oral and Maxillofacial Radiol Clin   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone remodelling; Mandible; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; DENTITION; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MEASUREMENT; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; AGE; EDENTULOUSNESS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BONE REMODELING; DENTITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 14244259289     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/17685970     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Enlow D. The edentulous mandible. In: Enlow D (ed). Handbook of facial growth. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1982, pp 431-437.
2. Devlin H, Ferguson M. Aging and the orofacial tissues. In: Tallis R, Fillit H (eds). Brocklehurst's textbook of geriatric medicine and gerontology. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2003, pp 951-964.
3. Ceylan G, Yanikoglu N, Yilmaz A, Ceylan Y. Changes in the mandibular angle in the dentulous and edentulous states. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 680-684.
4. Ohm E, Silness J. Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 883-891.
5. Casey DM, Emrich LJ. Changes in the mandibular angle in the edentulous state. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 373-380.
6. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255-268.
7. Lin LI. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 2000; 56: 324-325.
8. Cawood JI, Howel RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 232-236.
9. Xie Q, Soikkonen K, Wolf J, Mattila K, Gong M, Ainamo A. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 61-66.
10. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod 1977; 47: 107-110.
11. Raustia AM, Salonen MA. Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers-a panoramic radiograph study. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 512-516.
12. Lambrechts AH, Harris AM, Rossouw PE, Stander I. Dimensional differences in the craniofacial morphologies of groups with deep and shallow mandibular antegonial notching. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 265-272.
13. Salem OH, Al-Sehaibany F, Preston CB. Aspects of mandibular morphology, with specific reference to the antegonial notch and the curve of Spee. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003; 27: 261-266.
14. Kolodziej RP, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of antegonial notch depth for growth prediction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 357-363.
15. Enlow DH, Bianco HJ, Eklund S. The remodelling of the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36: 685-693.
16. Xie Q, Wolf J, Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Height of mandibular basal bone in dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 379-383.