Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: An in vitro study

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 61-66

  Xie, Qiufei ^a   Soikkonen, K ^a   Wolf, J ^a   Mattila, K ^a   Gong, M ^b   Ainamo, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biometry; Dental implantation; Radiography, panoramic

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; METHODOLOGY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; JAW; LINEAR MODELS; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0030112131     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.25.2.9446974     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wical KE, Swoope CC. Studies of residual ridge resorption. Part 1. Use of panoramic radiographs for evaluation and classification of mandibular resorption. J Prosthet Dent 1974; 32: 7-12.
2. Landesman HM, Davis WH, Martinoff J, Kaminishi R. Resorption of the edentulous mandible after a vestibuloplasty with skin grafting. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 619-22.
3. van Waas MAJ. Ridge resorption in denture wearers after vestibuloplasty and lowering of the floor of the mouth, measured on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1983; 12: 115-21.
4. Goldberg AF, Gergans GA, Mattson DE, Rudman D, Radio-graphic alveolar process/mandibular height ratio as a predictor of osteoporosis. Gerodontics 1988; 4: 229-31.
5. Packota GV, Hoover JN, Neufeld BD. A study of the height of intact alveolar bone on panoramic radiographs of adult patients. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 504-9.
6. Humphries S. Devlin H, Worthington H. A radiographic investigation into bone resorption of mandibular alveolar bone in elderly edentulous adults. J Dent 1989: 17: 94-6.
7. Council on Dental Material and Devices. Advantages and disadvantages of the use of dental tomographic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 94: 147.
8. Nilsson L. Rohlin M, Thapper K. Exposure distribution, absorbed doses, and energy imparted for panoramic radiography using Orthopantomograph model OP 5. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 59: 212-9.
9. Petrikowski CG, Pharoah MJ, Schmitt A. Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 59-64.
10. Carter LC, Dennison M, Carter JM, Panoramic zonography of the midface: A clinician's guide to vertical magnification. Today's FDA December 1990: 2(12): 1c-3c.
11. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991; 20: 40-2.
12. Hussein GE, Ahmed SE. The effect of resilient layer and occlusal reactive complete dentures on the residual alveolar ridge. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 598-602.
13. Schiff T, D'Ambrosio J, Glass BJ, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Common positioning and technical errors in panoramic radiography, J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 113: 422-6.
14. Paatero YV. The shape and size of the image and the thickness of the image layer in orthopantomography. Suom Hammaslääk Toim 1958; 54: 267-73 (in Finnish with English summary).
15. Welander U, Wickman G. Blurring and layer thickness in narrow beam rotation radiography. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 1977: 18: 705-14.
16. Hassen SM, Manson-Hing LR. A study of the zone of sharpness of three panoramic x-ray machines and the effect of screen speed on the sharpness zone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54: 242-9.
17. Welander U, McDavid W, Tronje G, Morris CR. An analysis of different planes within the image layer in rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1987; 16: 79-84.
18. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. I. General considerations. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 1981; 22: 295-9.
19. Tronje G, Eliasson S, Julin P, Welander U. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. II. Vertical distances. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 1981; 22: 449-55.
20. Soikkonen K, Wolf J, Tenkanen M, Clinical and panoramic assessment of marginal hone loss. A cadaver study. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1990; 86: 137-41.
21. Talari A, Kilpinen E, Ainamo J. Distortion of gingival measurements in the orthopantomogram. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1975; 71: 111-15.