Specificity of the oxford knee status questionnaire

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 345-347

  Harcourt, W G V ^a   White, S H ^a   Jones, P ^a  

^a ROBERT JONES AND AGNES HUNT ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIP DISEASE; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE SURGERY; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATHOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0035033880     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.0830345     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Editorial. An assessment of assessment
2. Editorial. Outcomes measurement: More questions; some answers
3. Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis: Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias
4. The need for a dual rating system in total knee arthroplasty
5. Ask patients what they want: Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement
6. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system
7. The St Georg sledge for unicompartmental replacement of the knee: A prospective study of 115 cases
8. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses
9. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment
10. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement
11. Early failure of the porous coated anatomic (PCA) cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 5- to 9-year follow-up study
12. High tibial osteotomy using a dynamic axial external fixator
13. Demographic biases of scoring instruments for the results of total knee arthroplasty