LHS-based hybrid microdata VS rank swapping and microaggregation for numeric microdata protection

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2316, Issue , 2002, Pages 153-162

  Dandekar, Ramesh A ^a   Domingo Ferrer, Josep ^b   Sebé, Francesc ^b  

^a Energy Information Administration   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Microaggregation; Microdata masking; Rank swapping; Synthetic microdata generation

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION USE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

INFORMATION LOSS; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; MICROAGGREGATION; MICRODATA; MICRODATA PROTECTION; RANK SWAPPING; STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS; UNIQUE FEATURES;

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84949476900     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47804-3_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. R.A. Dandekar, “Performance improvement of restricted pairing algorithm for Latin hypercube sampling”, in ASA Summer Conference (unpublished).
2. R.A. Dandekar, M. Cohen and N. Kirkendall, “Applicability of Latin hypercube sampling technique to create multivariate synthetic microdata”, in Proc. of ETKNTTS 2001. Luxembourg: Eurostat, pp. 839-847, 2001.
3. D. Defays and P. Nanopoulos, “Panels of enterprises and confidentiality: The small aggregates method”, in Proc. of 92 Symposium on Design and Analysis of Longitudinal Surveys. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 195-204, 1993.
4. J. Domingo-Ferrer, J.M. Mateo-Sanz, and V. Torra, “Comparing SDC methods for microdata on the basis of information loss and disclosure risk”, Proc. of ETKNTTS 2001. Luxemburg: Eurostat, pp. 807-825, 2001.
5. J. Domingo-Ferrer and V. Torra, “A quantitative comparison of disclosure control methods for microdata”, in Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Access, eds. P. Doyle, J. Lane, J. Theeuwes and L. Zayatz. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 111- 133, 2001.
6. J. Domingo-Ferrer and J.M. Mateo-Sanz, “Practical data-oriented microaggregation for statistical disclosure control”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 189-201, 2002.
7. R.L. Iman and W.J. Conover, “A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables”, Communications in Statistics, vol. B11, no. 3, pp. 311-334, 1982.
8. M.A. Jaro, “Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 84, pp. 414-420, 1989.
9. A.B. Kennickell, “Multiple imputation and disclosure protection: the case of the 1995 survey of consumer finances”, in Statistical Data Protection. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 381-400, 1999.
10. M.D. McKay, W.J. Conover, and R.J. Beckman, “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code”, Technometrics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 239-245, 1979.
11. R. Moore, “Controlled data swapping techniques for masking public use microdata sets”, U. S. Bureau of the Census, 1996 (unpublished manuscript).
12. L. Willenborg and T. de Waal, Elements of Statistical Disclosure Control. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.