Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing

Memory

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 189-199

  Burns, Daniel J ^a   Hebert, Theresa ^a  

^a UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RECALL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 14044260642     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09608210344000670     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R.L. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176-1189.
2. Bousfield, W. A., & Sedgewick, C. H. W. (1944). An analysis of restricted associative responses. Journal of General Psychology, 30 149-165.
3. Burns, D. J. (1993). Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 163-173.
4. Burns, D. J. (in press). The simultaneous acquisition effect: Simultaneous-task learning inhibits memory for order. American Journal of Psychology.
5. Burns, D. J., & Brown, C. A. (2000). The category access measure of relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1057-1062.
6. Burns, D. J., & Gold, D. E. (1999). An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 978-985.
7. Burns, D. J., & Schoff, K. M. (1998). Slow and steady often ties the race: The effects of item-specific and relational processing on cumulative recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1041-1051.
8. Cohen, B. H. (1963). Recall of categorized word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 368-376.
9. Cohen, B. H. (1966). Some or none characteristics of coding behavior. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 182-187.
10. Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 671-682.
11. Engelkamp, J., & Seiler, K. H. (2003). Gains and losses in action memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 829-848.
12. Einstein, G. O., & Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 588-598.
13. Gronlund, S. D., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1986). Retrieval strategies in recall of natural categories and categorized lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12 550-561.
14. Hermann, D. J., & Chaffin, R. J. S. (1976). Number of available associations and rate of association for categories in semantic memory. Journal of General Psychology, 95, 227-231.
15. Hermann, D. J., & Murray, D. J. (1979). The role of category size in continuous recall from semantic memory. Journal of General Psychology, 101,205-218.
16. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
17. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32 421-445.
18. Hunt, R. R., & Seta, C. E. (1984). Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10 454-464.
19. Indow, T., & Togano, K. (1970). On retrieving sequence from long-term memory. Psychological Review, 77, 317-331.
20. Johnson, D. M., Johnson, R. C., & Marks, A. L. (1951). A mathematical analysis of verbal recall. Journal of General Psychology, 44, 121-128.
21. Kaplan, I. T., Carvellas, T., & Metlay, W. (1969). Searching for words in letter sets of varying size. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 377-380.
22. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Aseron, R. (1989). Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1192-1197.
23. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Schell, T. (1994). Repeated testing: A technique for assessing the roles of elaborative and organizational knowledge in the representation of social knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 830-839.
24. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., DeLosh, E. L., May, C. P., & Brady, P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It's not surprising, it's complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 422-435.
25. McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., & Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three factor theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 521-536.
26. Mulligan, N. W. (2000). Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests. Memory & Cognition, 28, 539-546.
27. Mulligan, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27 436-450.
28. Mulligan, N. W. (2002). The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: Perceptual interference and multiple recall tests. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 375-382.
29. Mulligan, N. W., & Duke, M. D. (2002). Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1044-1053.
30. Neely, J. H., & Balota, D. A. (1981). Test-expectancy and semantic-organization effects in recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 283-300.
31. Payne, D. G. (1986). Hypermnesia for pictures and words: Testing the recall level hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 16-29.
32. Raaijmakers, J. W., & Shiffrin. R. M. (1980). A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp 207-262). New York: Academic Press.
33. Roediger, H. L., Payne, D. G., Gillespie, G. L., & Lean, D. S. (1982). Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21,635-665.
34. Roediger, H. L., Stellon, C. C., & Tulving, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 174-188.
35. Roediger, H. L., & Thorpe, L. A. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia. Memory & Cognition, 6, 296-305.
36. Rohrer, D., & Wixted, J. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 511-524.
37. Schmidt, S. R., & Cherry, K. (1989). The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 17, 359-369.
38. Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 589-607.
39. Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391.
40. Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (1993). Proactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1024-1039.
41. Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (1994). Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 89-106.