Fluency and functional motor skills following brain injury

Behavioral Interventions

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 77-89

  Eastridge, Dixie ^a   Mozzoni, Michael P ^b  

^a Oklahoma NeuroRestorative Center   (United States)

^b Timber Ridge Group Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARM REACH; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FLUENCY; GRASPING; HAND FUNCTION; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; POINTING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TOUCH; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 13944284155     PISSN: 10720847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bin.175     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barrett, B. H. (1977). Some parameters of pupil freedom. Presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Education of the Severely and Profoundly Handicapped, San Francisco.
2. Barrett, B. H. (1979). Communitization and the measured message of normal behavior. In R. York, & E. Edgar (Eds.), Teaching the severely handicapped (Vol. 4, pp. 301-318). Columbus, OH: Special.
3. Binder, C. (1976). The effects of response rate building on acquisition, transfer, and retention of skills. Presented at a conference of the Behavioral Intervention Project, Arlington, MA.
4. Binder, C. (1979). Anne Desjardins and Bev Palmer at Plainfield Children's Hospital. Data-Sharing Newsletter, 21, 1.
5. Binder, C. (1988). Precision teaching: Measuring and attaining exemplary academic achievement. Youth Policy, 10(1), 12-15.
6. Binder, C. (1990). Closing the confidence gap. Training, 49-56.
7. Binder, C. (1993). Behavioral fluency: A new paradigm. Educational Technology, 8-14.
8. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163-197.
9. Bourie, C., & Binder, C. (1980). Exit assessment: Diagnostic use of the standard celeration chart for curriculum planning. Poster presented at a meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Dearborn, MI.
10. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Traumatic injury in the United States: An interim report to Congress. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
11. Desjardins, A. (1995). Teaching fine motor skills: Big 6 + 6. Seattle: Morningside Academy.
12. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
13. Haughton, E. C. (1972). Aims: Growing and sharing. In J. B. Jordan, & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let's try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 20-39). Arlington, VA: Council on Exceptional Children.
14. Haughton, E. C. (1980). Practicing practices: Learning by activity. Journal of Precision Teaching, 1(3), 3-20.
15. Haughton, E. C. (1981). Behavioral valence. Data-Sharing Newsletter, 3, 3.
16. Haughton, E. C., & Kovacs, M. (1977). Curriculum snapshot-271 pinpoints: Cross-age performance ranges. Grimsby, Ontario: Kouacs and Associates.
17. Held, J. M. (2000). Recovery of function after brain damage: Theoretical implications for therapeutic intervention. In J. Carr, & R. Shepherd (Eds.), Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation (pp. 388-405). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
18. Johnson, K. R. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier. American Psychologist, 1447.
19. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 281-288.
20. Kovacs, M., & Haughton, E. C. (1978). Body control guidelines. Grimsby, Ontario: Kouacs and Associates.
21. Morris, D. M., Crago, J., DeLuca, S., Pidikiti, R., & Taub, E. (1997). Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation, 9, 29-43.
22. Mozzoni, M. P., & Bailey, J. S. (1996). Improving training methods in brain injury rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11(1), 1-18.
23. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (1998). Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Statement Online 1998 Oct 26-28, 16(1), 1-41. Retrieved January 10, 2001, from http://odp.od.nih.gov/consensus/ cons/109/109-statement.htm
24. Page, S., Sisto, S., Levine, P., & McGrath, R. (2004). Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(1), 14-18.
25. Pollard, J. (1979). A task analytic approach to teaching the profoundly retarded effective self-initiated toilet paper skills. Presented at a meeting of the American Association for the Education of the Severely and Profoundly Handicapped, Chicago, IL.
26. Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H. (2001). Motor control: Theory and practical applications. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
27. Solsten, K., & McManus, R. (1979). Vocational assessment of nine autistic students at AMEGO, Inc. Report to the Massachusetts Department of Education in fulfillment of a grant pursuant to funding Massachusetts Public Law 89-313.
28. Taub, E., Crago, J. E., & Burgio, L. (1994). An operant approach to overcoming learned nonuse after CNS damage in monkeys and man: The role of shaping. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 81-293.
29. Taub, E., Miller, N. E., & Novack, T. A. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archival Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 74, 374-354.
30. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Pidikiti, R. D. (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Development, 128, 237-251.
31. Taub, E., & Wolf, S. L. (1997). Constraint-induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabilitation, 3(4), 38-61.
32. Uniform Data Systems. (1991). Guide for the use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation including the Functional Independence Measure. Buffalo, NY: Research Foundation, State University of New York.
33. Van Houten, R. (1980). Description of a study demonstrating the effects of building rate of writing answers to simple multiplication facts on the performance of long multiplication. Learning through feedback: A systematic approach for improving academic performance. New York: Human Sciences.
34. Wehman, P. (1992). Sequelae of closed head injury. In Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (p. 84). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.