A Uniform Method of Grammar Extraction and Its Applications

Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, SIGDAT-EMNLP 2000 - Held in conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 53-62

  Xia, Fei ^a   Palmer, Martha ^a   Joshi, Aravind ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORE ELEMENTS; GRAMMAR EXTRACTION; ITS APPLICATIONS; NLP TOOLS; RELATED WORKS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85037145772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. R. Chandrasekar and B. Srinivas. 1997. Gleaning information from the Web: Using Syntax to Filter out Irrelevant Information. In Proc. of AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on NLP on the World Wide Web.
2. Eugene Charniak. 1996. Treebank Grammars. In Proc. of AAAI-1996.
3. Eugene Charniak. 1997. Statistical Parsing with a Context-Free Grammar and Word Statistics. In Proc. of AAAI-1997.
4. John Chen and K. Vijay-Shanker. 2000. Automated Extraction of TAGs from the Penn Tree-bank. In 6th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT-2000), Italy.
5. John Chen, Srinivas Bangalore, and K. Vijay-Shanker. 1999. New Models for Improving Supertag Disambiguation. In Proc. of EACL-1999.
6. Mike Collins. 1997. Three Generative, Lexicalised Models for Statistical Parsing. In Proc. of the 35th ACL.
7. C. Doran, D. Egedi, B. A. Hockey, B. Srinivas, and M. Zaidel. 1994. XTAG System - A Wide Coverage Grammar for English. In Proc. of COLING-1994, Kyoto, Japan.
8. Aravind Joshi and B. Srinivas. 1994. Disambiguation of Super Parts of Speech (or Supertags): Almost Parsing. In Proc. of COLING-1994.
9. Aravind Joshi and K. Vijay-Shanker. 1999. Compositional Semantics with LTAG: How Much Underspecification Is Necessary? In Proc. of 3nd International Workshop on Computational Semantics.
10. Aravind K. Joshi, L. Levy, and M. Takahashi. 1975. Tree Adjunct Grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences.
11. Laura Kallmeyer and Aravind Joshi. 1999. Un-derspecified Semantics with LTAG.
12. Alexander Krotov, Mark Hepple, Robert Gaizauskas, and Yorick Wilks. 1998. Compacting the Penn Treebank Grammar. In Proc. of ACL-COLING.
13. David M. Magerman. 1995. Statistical Decision-Tree Models for Parsing. In Proc. of the 33rd ACL.
14. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Lingustics.
15. K. F. McCoy, K. Vijay-Shanker, and G. Yang. 1992. A Functional Approach to Generation with TAG. In Proc. of the 30th ACL.
16. Martha Palmer, Owen Rambow, and Alexis Nasr. 1998. Rapid Prototyping of Domain-Specific Machine Translation System. In Proc. of AMTA-1998, Langhorne, PA.
17. Rashmi Prasad and Anoop Sarkar. 2000. Comparing Test-Suite Based Evaluation and Corpus-Based Evaluation of a Wide-Coverage Grammar for English. In Proc. of LREC satellite workshop Using Evaluation within HLT Programs: Results and Trends, Athen, Greece.
18. Carlos A. Prolo. 2000. An Efficient LR Parser Generator for TAGs. In 6th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT 2000), Italy.
19. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1998. Maximum Entropy Models for Natural Language Ambiguity Resolution. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
20. Anoop Sarkar and Aravind Joshi. 1996. Coordination in Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalization and Implementation. In Proc. of the 18th COLING, Copenhagen, Denmark.
21. Anoop Sarkar. 2000. Practical Experiments in Parsing using Tree Adjoining Grammars. In Proc. of 5th International Workshop on TAG and Related Frameworks (TAG+5).
22. The XTAG-Group. 1998. A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English. Technical Report IRCS 98-18, University of Pennsylvania.
23. Yves Schabes and Stuart Shieber. 1992. An Alternative Conception of Tree-Adjoining Derivation. In Proc. of the 20th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Yves Schabes. 1990. Mathematical and Computational Aspects of Lexicalized Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
25. Kiyoaki Shirai, Takenobu Tokunaga, and Hozumi Tanaka. 1995. Automatic Extraction of Japanese Grammar from a Bracketed Corpus. In Proc. of Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium (NLPRS-1995).
26. B. Srinivas, Anoop Sarkar, Christine Doran, and Beth Ann Hockey. 1998. Grammar and Parser Evaluation in the XTAG Project. In Workshop on Evaluation of Parsing Systems, Granada, Spain.
27. B. Srinivas. 1997. Complexity of Lexical Descriptions and Its Relevance to Partial Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
28. Matthew Stone and Christine Doran. 1997. Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree Adjoining Grammar. In Proc. of the 35th ACL.
29. Bonnie Webber and Aravind Joshi. 1998. Anchoring a Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for Discourse. In Proc. of ACL-COLING Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers.
30. Fei Xia and Tonia Bleam. 2000. A Corpus-Based Evaluation of Syntactic Locality in TAGs. In Proc. of 5th International Workshop on TAG and Related Frameworks (TAG+5).
31. Fei Xia, Chunghye Han, Martha Palmer, and Aravind Joshi. 2000a. Comparing Lexicalized Treebank Grammars Extracted from Chinese, Korean, and English Corpora. In Proc. of the 2nd Chinese Language Processing Workshop, Hong Kong, China.
32. Fei Xia, Martha Palmer, Nianwen Xue, Mary Ellen Okurowski, John Kovarik, Shizhe Huang, Tony Kroch, and Mitch Marcus. 2000b. Developing Guidelines and Ensuring Consistency for Chinese Text Annotation. In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2000), Athens, Greece.