Auditory rehabilitation;Réhabilitation auditive

Medecine/Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 190-197

  Bouccara, Didier ^a   Avan, Paul ^c   Mosnier, Isabelle ^a   Grayeli, Alexis Bozorg ^a   Ferrary, Évelyne ^a   Sterkers, Olivier ^b  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b BEAUJON HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; MIDDLE EAR DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 13944251307     PISSN: 07670974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2005212190     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Gold T. Hearing. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Edinburgh Biol Sci 1948; 135: 492-8.
2. Erminy M, Bonfils P, Trotoux J. Otospongiose. Encycl Med Chir, Elsevier, Paris, Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie 20-195-A-10, 1996, 12 p.
3. Morgon A. L'aide auditive. Encycl Med Chir, Elsevier, Paris, Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie 20-185-E-10, 1999, 11 p.
4. Bille M, Parving A. Expectations about hearing aids: demographic and audiological predictors. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 481-8.
5. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176-86.
6. Moore BC, Huss M, Vickers DA, et al. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205-24.
7. Mom T, Avan P, Gilain L. Atteintes centrales de l'audition. Encycl Med Chir, Elsevier, Paris, Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie 20-184-A-10, 2001, 10 p.
8. Martini A, Mazzoli M, Rosignoli M, et al. Hearing in the elderly: a population study. Audiology 2001; 40: 285-93.
9. Demanez L, Demanez JP. Central auditory processing assessment. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Belg 2003; 57: 243-52.
10. Sterkers O, Boucarra D, Labassi S, et al. A middle ear implant, the Symphonix Vibrant soundbridge: retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24: 427-36.
11. Kasic JF, Fredrickson JM. The otologics M ossicular stimulator. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001; 34: 501-13.
12. Dauman R, Carbonnière B, Soriano V, et al. Implants cochléaires chez l'adulte et l'enfant. Encycl Med Chir, Elsevier, Paris, Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie 20-185-D-10, 1998, 12 p.
13. Cohen NL. Cochlear implant candidacy and surgical considerations. Audiol Neurotol 2004; 9: 197-202.
14. Hamzavi J, Pok SM, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner WD. Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 61-5.
15. Muller J, Schon F, Helms J. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 198-206.
16. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KE. A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 1255-62.
17. Vaneecloo FM, Hanson JN, Laroche C, et al. Prosthetic rehabilitation of unilateral anakusis. Study with stereoaudiometry. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 2000; 117: 410-7.
18. Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24: 73-8.
19. Sellick PM, Patuzzi R, Johnstone BM. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 131-41.
20. Casenave A, Mondain M, Frachet B, Hamann C, Sterkers O. Les surdités: de la prothèse à l'implant. Les monographies du CCA. Paris: Éditions Amplifon, 2002.