Multi-dimensional electromagnetic modeling and inversion with application to near-surface earth investigations

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 46, Issue 1-3 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 71-102

  Pellerin, Louise ^a   Wannamaker, Philip E ^b  

^a Green Engineering Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrical conductivity; Electromagnetics; Geophysics; Inversion; Modeling

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CLAY; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SALINITY MEASUREMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOILS; WATER;

CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION MAPPING; DATA SETS; ELECTROMAGNETIC MODELING; WATER SATURATION;

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROSPECTING;

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOPHYSICS;

CLAY; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; RESISTIVITY; SALINITY; SOIL;

EID: 13844317997     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (154)

1. D.L. Alumbaugh, G.A. Newman, L. Prevost, and J.N. Shahid Three-dimensional wideband electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers Radio Sci. 31 1996 1 23
2. W.A. Anderson Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders 0 and 1 by adaptive digital filtering Geophysics 44 1979 1287 1305
3. Auken, E., Thomsen, P., Sørensen, K., 2000. Lateral constrained inversion (LCI) of profile oriented data: the resistivity case. In: Proceedings for Sixth Annual Meeting, Bochum, Germany. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section, Lausanne, Switzerland, p. EL06.
4. Auken, E., Pellerin, L., Sorensen, K., 2001. Mutually constrained inversion (MCI) of electrical and electromagnetic data. In: Expanded Abstracts, 71st Annual International Meeting, San Antonio, TX, Society of Exploration Geophysics Tulsa, OK, pp. 1455-1458.
5. E. Auken, and A.V. Christiansen Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data Geophysics 69 2004 752 761
6. D.B. Avdeev, A.V. Kuvshinov, O.V. Pankratov, and G.A. Newman Three-dimensional induction logging problems, part I: an integral equation solution and model comparisons Geophysics 67 2002 413 426
7. E. Badea, M. Everett, G. Newman, and O. Biro Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using coulomb-gauged potentials Geophysics 66 2001 786 799
8. O. Banton, M.-K. Seguin, and M.-A. Cimon Mapping field-scale physical properties of soil with electrical resistivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61 1997 1010 1017
9. A. Binley, G. Cassiani, R. Middleton, and P. Winship Vadose zone model parameterization using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imaging J. Hydrol. 267 2002 147 159
10. A. Binley, P. Winship, L. West, M. Pokar, and R. Middleton Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles J. Hydrol. 267 2002 160 172
11. D.E. Boerner Controlled source electromagnetic deep sounding: theory, results and correlation with natural source results Surv. Geophys. 13 1992 435 488
12. F. Borner, M. Gruhne, and J. Schon Contamination indications derived from electrical properties in the low frequency ranges Geophys. Prospect. 41 1993 83 98
13. G. Buselli, and D.R. Williamson Modeling of broadband airborne electromagnetic responses from saline environments Geophysics 61 1996 1624 1632
14. Buselli, G., Barber, C., Davis, G.B., Salama, R.B., 1990. Detection of groundwater contamination near waste disposal sites with transient electromagnetic and electrical methods. In: Ward, S.H. (Ed.), Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, vol. 2, Environmental and Groundwater, Investigations in Geophysics, no. 5. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 27-39.
15. Carlson, N.R., Mayerle, C.M., Zonge, K.L., 1999. Extremely fast IP used to delineate buried landfills. In: Proceedings for the Fifth Annual Meeting, Budapest, Hungary. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section, Lausanne, Switzerland, Ch3.
16. C. Carr Soil Resistivity Surveying 1982 Center for American Archeology Press Evanston, IL
17. N.B. Christensen Optimized fast Hankel transform filters Geophys. Prospect. 38 1990 545 568
18. N.B. Christensen Difficulties in determining electrical anisotropy in subsurface investigations Geophys. Prospect. 48 2000 1 20
19. N.B. Christensen, and K.I. Sørensen Surface and borehole electric and electromagnetic methods for hydrogeophysical investigations Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 3 1998 75 90
20. S.C. Constable, R.L. Parker, and C.G. Constable Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic data Geophysics 52 1987 289 300
21. Dahlin, T., Loke, M.H., 1997. Quasi-3-D resistivity imaging-mapping of three-dimensional structures using two dimensional dc resistivity techniques. In: Proceedings for the Third Annual Meeting, Aarhus, Denmark, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 143-146.
22. T. Dahlin, and H.M. Loke Resolution of 2-D Wenner resistivity imaging as assessed by numerical modeling J. Appl. Geophys. 38 1998 237 249
23. Dahlin, T., Bing, Z., 2001. A numerical comparison of 2-D resistivity imaging with eight electrode arrays. In: Proceedings for the Seventh Annual Meeting, Birmingham, UK, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 92-93.
24. Dahlin, T., Leroux, V., Nissen, J., 2004. Measuring techniques in induced polarization imaging. J. Appl. Geophys., in press.
25. C. de Groot-Hedlin, and S.C. Constable Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data Geophysics 55 1990 1613 1624
26. P.P. DeLugao, and P.E. Wannamaker Calculating the two-dimensional magnetotelluric Jacobian in finite elements using reciprocity Geophys. J. Int. 127 1996 806 810
27. P.P. DeLugao, O. Portniaguine, and M.S. Zhdanov Fast and stable two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 49 1997 1469 1497
28. Denne, R., Collins, S., Brown, P., Hee, R., White, R.M.S., 2001. A new survey design for 3-D IP inversion modelling at Copper Hill. In: Extended Abstracts of the 15th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia. ASEG, Qld, Australia.
29. M. Deszcz-Pan, D. Fitterman, and V. Labson Reduction of inversion errors in helicopter EM data using auxiliary information Explor. Geophys. Aust. Soc. Explor. Geophys. 29 1998 142 146
30. Draskovits, P., Hobot, J., Vero, L., Smith, B.D., 1990. Induced-polarization surveys applied to evaluation of groundwater resources, Pannonian Basin, Hungary. In: Fink, J.B., Sternberg, B.K., McAlister, E.O., Wieduwilt, W.G., Ward, S.H. (Eds.), Induced Polarization: Applications and Case Histories, Investigations in Geophysics, no. 4. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 379-410.
31. du Saire, M., 2003. Using 2D resistivity surveys to describe variability of soil depth and corn yield. M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
32. P.A. Eaton 3D electromagnetic inversion using integral equations Geophys. Prospect. 37 1989 407 426
33. P.A. Eaton, and G.W. Hohmann A rapid inversion technique for transient electromagnetic soundings Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 53 1989 384 404
34. R.G. Ellis, and D.W. Oldenburg Applied geophysical inversion Geophys. J. Int. 116 1994 5 11
35. Endo, M., Noguchi, K., 2002. Three-dimensional modeling considering the topography for the case of the time-domain electromagnetic method. In: Zhdanov, M.S., Wannamaker, P.E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on 3-D Electromagnetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 85-108.
36. M.E. Everett Finite-element formulation of electromagnetic induction with coupled potentials. M. Oristaglio B. Spies Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics 1999 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 444 450
37. J.B. Fink B.K. Sternberg E.O. McAlister W.G. Wieduwilt S.H. Ward Induced Polarization: Applications and Case Histories. Investigations in Geophysics vol. 4 1990 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 414
38. D. Fitterman Sources of calibration errors in helicopter EM data. Exploration Geophysics Aust. Soc. Explor. Geophys. 29 1998 65 70
39. D. Fitterman, and M. Deszcz-Pan Helicopter EM mapping of saltwater intrusion in Everglades National Park, Florida Explor. Geophys. 29 1998 240 243
40. D.V. Fitterman, M. Deszcz-Pan, and C.E. Stoddard Results of time-domain electromagnetic soundings in Everglades National Park, Florida USGS Open-File Report 1999 99 426
41. R. George, and P. Woodgate Critical factors affecting the adoption of airborne geophysics for management of dryland salinity Explor. Geophys. 33 2002 84 89
42. E. Gomez-Trevino A simple sensitivity analysis of time-domain and frequency-domain electromagnetic measurements Geophysics 52 1987 1418 1423
43. F.S. Grant, and G.F. West Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics 1965 McGraw-Hill New York
44. D.H. Griffiths, J. Turnbull, and A.I. Olayinka Two-dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer-controlled array First Break 8 1990 121 129
45. D.H. Griffiths, and R.D. Barker Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology J. Appl. Geophys. 29 1993 211 226
46. Á. Gyulai, and T. Ormos A new procedure for the interpretation of VES data: 1.5-D simultaneous inversion method J. Appl. Geophys. 41 1999 1 17
47. E. Haber, U. Ascher, D. Aruliah, and D. Oldenburg Fast simulation of 3D electromagnetic responses using potentials J. Comput. Phys. 163 2000 150 171
48. R.F. Harrington Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields 1961 McGraw-Hill Electrical and Electronic Engineering Series New York, NY
49. R.F. Harrington Field Computation by Moment Methods 1968 McMillan Co. New York
50. J.M.H. Hendickx, B. Borchers, D.L. Corwin, S.M. Lesch, A.C. Hilgendorf, and J. Schlue Inversion of soil conductivity profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements: theory and experimental verification J. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 66 2002 673 685
51. G.W. Hohmann Three-dimensional induced polarization and electromagnetic modeling Geophysics 40 1975 309 324
52. H. Huang, and I.J. Won Conductivity and susceptibility mapping using broadband electromagnetic sensors J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 5 2000 4
53. G. Hursan, and M.S. Zhdanov Contraction integral equation method in three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling Radio Sci. 37 2002 1089 1099
54. H.K. Johansen, and K. Sorensen Fast Hankel transforms Geophys. Prospect. 27 1979 876 901
55. D.D. Jackson Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient, and inconsistent data Geophys. J. R. Astronom. Soc. 28 1972 97 109
56. Kirsch, R., Röttger, B., Voss W., 2001. Thematic maps from airborne electromagnetic surveys. In: Proceedings for the Seventh Annual Meeting, Birmingham, UK. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section, Lausanne, Switzerland, p. HYDR13.
57. LaBrecque, D.J., 1989. Cross-borehole resistivity modeling and model fitting, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
58. D.J. LaBrecque Finite difference modeling of 3-D EM fields with scalar and vector potentials M. Oristaglio B. Spies Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, Geophysical Developments Series vol. 7 1999 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 146 160
59. LaBrecque, D.J., Yang, X., 2000. Difference inversion of ERT data: a fast inversion method for 3-D in situ monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Arlington, VA. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Denver, CO, pp. 907-914.
60. D.J. LaBrecque, M. Miletto, W. Daily, A. Ramirez, and E. Owen The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data Geophysics 61 1996 538 548
61. D.J. LaBrecque, G. Morelli, W. Daily, A. Ramirez, and P. Lundegard Occam's inversion of 3-D electrical resistivity tomography M. Oristaglio B. Spies Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, Geophysical Developments Series vol. 7 1999 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 575 590
62. LaBrecque, D.J., Alumbaugh, D.L., Yang, X., Paprocki, L., Brainard, J., 2002. Three-dimensional monitoring of vadose zone infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography and cross-borehole ground penetrating radar. In: Zhdanov, M.S., Wannamaker, P.E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on 3-D Electromagnetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 259-272.
63. Y. Li, and D.W. Oldenburg Inversion of 3-D dc resistivity data using an approximate inverse mapping Geophys. J. Int. 116 1994 527 537
64. Y. Li, and D.W. Oldenburg Inversion of induced polarization data Geophysics 59 1994 1327 1341
65. Y. Li, and D.W. Oldenburg 3-D inversion of induced polarization data Geophysics 65 2000 1931 1945
66. G. Liu, and A. Becker Two-dimensional mapping of sea-ice keels with airborne electromagnetics Geophysics 55 1990 239 248
67. Loke, M.H., 2001. Constrained time lapse resistivity imaging inversion. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Denver, CO. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Denver, CO, p. EEM-7.
68. M.H. Loke, and R.D. Barker Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method Geophys. Prospect. 44 1996 131 152
69. M.H. Loke, and R.D. Barker Practical techniques for 3-D resistivity surveys and data inversion Geophys. Prospect. 44 1996 499 523
70. T.R. Madden The resolving power of geoelectric measurements for delineating resistive zones within the crust J.G. Heacock American Geophysical Union vol. 14 1971 Geophysical Monograph Washington, DC 95 106
71. Madden, T.R., Mackie, R.L., 1989. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling and inversion, Proceedings of the IEEE 77, pp. 318-324.
72. R.L. Mackie, and T.R. Madden Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients Geophys. J. Int. 115 1993 215 229
73. Mackie, R.L., Rodi, W., Watts, M.D., 2001. 3-D magnetotelluric inversion for resource exploration. In: Expanded Abstracts: 71st Annual Meeting and International Exposition, San Antonio, TX. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 1501-1504.
74. H. Maurer, and D.E. Boerner Optimized and robust experimental design: a non-linear application to EM sounding Geophys. J. Int. 132 1998 458 468
75. H. Maurer, D.E. Boerner, and A. Curtis Design strategies for electromagnetic geophysical surveys Inverse Probl. 16 2000 1097 1117
76. J.D. McNeill Use of electromagnetic methods for groundwater studies S.H. Ward Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics vol. 1 1990 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 191 218
77. McNeill, J.D., 1992. Rapid accurate mapping of soil salinity be electromagnetic ground conductivity meters: advances in measurements of soil physical properties. Bringing theory into practice. Special Publication 30, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 209-229.
78. J.D. McNeill Why doesn't Geonics Limited build a multi-frequency EM31 or EM38 Technical Note TN-30 1996 Geonics Limited Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
79. J.D. McNeill, and M. Bosnar Application of dipole-dipole electromagnetic systems for geological depth sounding Technical Note TN-31 1999 Geonics Limited Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
80. S. Mehanee, and M.S. Zhdanov Two-dimensional inversion of blocky geoelectrical structures J. Geophys. Res. 107 B4 2002 2065
81. W. Menke Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory International Geophysics Series, vol. 45 1989 Academic Press San Diego, CA
82. Møller, I., 2001. OhmMapper field tests at sandy and clay till sites in Denmark. In: Proceedings for the Proceedings for the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section Seventh Annual Meeting, Birmingham, UK, p. ELEM05.
83. I. Møller, B.H. Jacobsen, and N.B. Christensen Rapid inversion of 2-D geoelectrical data by multichannel deconvolution Geophysics 66 2001 800 808
84. G.A. Newman, and D.L. Alumbaugh Frequency-domain modeling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences Geophys. Prospect. 43 1995 1021 1042
85. G.A. Newman, and D.L. Alumbaugh Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients Geophys. J. Int. 140 2000 410 424
86. G.A. Newman, S. Recher, B. Tezkan, and F. Neubauer 3D inversion of a scalar radio magnetotelluric field data set Geophysics 68 2003 791 802
87. D.C. Nobes Troubled waters: environmental applications of electrical and electromagnetic methods Surv. Geophys. 17 1996 393 454
88. D.W. Oldenburg Inversion of electromagnetic data: an overview of new techniques Surv. Geophys. 11 1990 231 270
89. D.W. Oldenburg Practical strategies for the solution of large-scale electromagnetic inverse problems Radio Sci. 29 1994 1081 1099
90. D.W. Oldenburg, and R.G. Ellis Inversion of geophysical data using an approximate inverse mapping Geophys. J. Int. 105 1991 325 353
91. C. Panissod, D. Michel, A. Hesse, A. Joivet, J. Tabbagh, and A. Tabbagh Recent developments in shallow-depth electrical and electrostatic prospecting using mobile arrays Geophysics 63 1998 1542 1550
92. Paprocki, L., Alumbaugh, D.L., 1999. An investigation of cross-borehole ground penetrating radar measurements for characterizing the 2D moisture content distribution in the vadose zone. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP). Oakland, CA, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Denver, CO, pp. 583-592.
93. R.L. Parker Geophysical Inverse Theory 1994 Princeton Univesrity Press Princeton, NJ
94. L. Pellerin Applications of electrical and electromagnetic methods for environmental and geotechnical investigations Surv. Geophys. 23 2002 101 132
95. Pellerin, L., Alumbaugh, D.L., 1997. Tools for Electromagnetic Investigation of the Shallow Subsurface. The Leading Edge, November 1997.
96. Pellerin, L., Johnston, J.M., Hohmann, G.W., 1993. Three-dimensional inversion of electromagnetic data. In: Expanded Abstracts, 63rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 360-363.
97. Pellerin, L., Labson, V.F., Pfeifer, M.C., 1994. VETEM: a very early time electromagnetic system. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP). Boston, MA, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Denver, CO, pp. 795-802.
98. M.A. Pérez-Flores, S. Méndez-Delgado, and E. Gómez-Treviño Imaging low-frequency and dc electromagnetic fields using a simple linear approximation Geophysics 66 2001 1067 1081
99. Petrick, W.R., 2002. Data considerations for 3D resistivity and induced polarization inversion. In: Expanded Abstract, 72nd Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, p. ER 2.4.
100. M. Pokar Quantification of unsaturated zone flow processes using resistivity imaging and GPR, Ph.D. Dissertation 2001 School of Earth Sciences, Leeds University UK
101. D.F. Pridmore, G.W. Hohmann, S.H. Ward, and W.R. Sill An investigation of finite-element modeling for electrical and electromagnetic data in three dimensions Geophysics 46 1981 1009 1024
102. K.F. Riley, M.P. Hobson, and S.J. Bence Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering 2002 Cambridge University Press New York, NY
103. M. Ritz, M. Descloitres, B. Robineau, and M. Courteaud Audiomagnetotelluric prospecting for groundwater in the Baril coastal area, Piton de la Fournaise volcano, Reunion Island Geophysics 62 1997 758 762
104. W. Rodi A technique for improving the accuracy of finite element solutions for magnetotelluric data Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 44 1976 483 506
105. W. Rodi, and R.L. Mackie Non-linear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2D magnetotelluric inversion Geophysics 66 2001 174 187
106. Y. Sasaki 3-D resistivity inversion using the finite-element method Geophysics 59 1994 1839 1848
107. Y. Sasaki Full 3-D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC J. Appl. Geophys. 46 2001 45 54
108. K.-P. Sengpiel, and B. Siemon Examples of 1-D inversion of multifrequency AEM data from 3-D resistivity distributions Explor. Geophys. 29 1998 133 141
109. K.-P. Sengpiel, and B. Siemon Advanced inversion methods for airborne electromagnetic exploration Geophysics 65 2000 1983 1992
110. B. Siemon New and improved resistivity-depth profiles for helicopter electromagnetic data J. Appl. Geophys. 46 2001 65 76
111. B. Singer Method for solution of Maxwell's equations in non-uniform media Geophys. J. Int. 120 1995 590 598
112. L.D. Slater, and D.R. Glaser Controls on induced polarization in sandy unconsolidated sediments and application to aquifer characterization Geophysics 68 2003 1547 1558
113. J.T. Smith Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields: part I. Properties and error analysis Geophysics 61 1996 1308 1318
114. J.T. Smith Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields: part II. Biconjugate gradient solution and an accelerator Geophysics 61 1996 1319 1324
115. J.T. Smith, and J.R. Booker Rapid inversion of two and three-dimensional magnetotelluric data J. Geophys. Res. 96 1991 3905 3922
116. J.T. Smith, M. Hoversten, E. Gasperikova, and F. Morrison Sharp boundary inversion of 2-D magnetotelluric data Geophys. Prospect. 47 1999 469 486
117. K. Spitzer A 3-D finite difference algorithm for dc resistivity modelling using conjugate gradient methods Geophys. J. Int. 123 1995 902 914
118. J.A. Stratton Electromagnetic Theory 1941 McGraw-Hill New York, NY
119. G. Street, G. Pracilio, and A.-M. Anderson-Mayes Interpretation of geophysical data for salt hazard identification and catchment management in Southwest Western Australia Explor. Geophys. 33 2002 2
120. Stummer, P., Maurer, H.R., 2001. Real-time experimental design applied to high-resolution direct-current resistivity surveys. In: Expanded Abstracts, The International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology, San Diego, CA, SPIE 4491, pp. 143-150.
121. K.I. Sørensen Pulled array continuous electrical profiling First Break 14 1996 85 90
122. Sørensen, K.I., Auken, E., 2003. New developments in high resolution airborne TEM instrumentation. In: Proceedings of the 16th Geophysical Conference & Exhibition, Adelaide, SA. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Qld, Australia, p. 63.
123. Sørensen, K.I., Auken, E., Christensen, N.B., Pellerin, L., 2004. An integrated approach for hydrogeophysical investigations: new technologies and a case history. In: Near-surface Geophysics, vol. II: Application and Case Histories, Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tulsa, OK, in press.
124. A. Tarantola Inverse Problem Theory 1987 Elsevier New York, NY
125. W.M. Telford, L.P. Geldart, and R.E. Sheriff Applied Geophysics 1990 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
126. B. Tezkan A review of environmental applications of quasi-stationary electromagnetic techniques Surv. Geophys. 20 1999 279 308
127. B. Tezkan, A. Hördt, and M. Gobashy Two-dimensional radiomagnetotelluric investigation of industrial and domestic waste sites in Germany J. Appl. Geophys. 44 2000 237 256
128. A.N. Tikhonov, and V.Y. Arsenin Solution of Ill-Posed Problems 1977 John Wiley and Sons New York, NY
129. M. Unsworth, and D. Oldenburg Subspace inversion of electromagnetic data: application to mid-ocean-ridge exploration Geophys. J. Int. 123 1995 161 168
130. M.J. Unsworth, B.J. Travis, and A.D. Chave Electromagnetic induction by a finite electric dipole over a two-dimensional earth Geophysics 58 1993 198 214
131. Vanhala, H., 1999. Comparison between geological models based on resistivity data and resistivity-IP data. In: Proceedings for the Fifth Annual Meeting, Budapest, Hungary. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section, Lausanne, Switzerland, p. De8.
132. H. Vanhala, and H. Soininen Laboratory technique for measurement of spectral induced polarization response of soil samples Geophys. Prospect. 43 1995 655 676
133. H. Vanhala, H. Soininen, and I. Kukkonen Detecting organic chemical contaminants by spectral-induced polarization method in glacial till environment Geophysics 57 1992 1014 1017
134. K. Vozoff The magnetotelluric method M.N. Nabighian Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Investigations in Geophysics vol. 2B 1991 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 641 711
135. T. Wang, and G.W. Hohmann A finite difference time-domain solution for three-dimensional electromagnetic modelling Geophysics 58 1993 797 809
136. P.E. Wannamaker Advances in three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using integral equations Geophysics 56 1991 1716 1728
137. Wannamaker, P.E., 1992. Finite element program for dipole-dipole resistivity/IP forward modeling and parameterized inversion of two-dimensional earth resistivity structure, User documentation, IP2DI-v1.00, U.S. Department of Energy Report DOE/ID/12929-01, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
138. P.E. Wannamaker Tensor CSAMT survey of the Sulphur Springs thermal area, Valles Caldera, New Mexico, Parts I and II: implications for structure of the western caldera and for CSAMT methodology Geophysics 62 1997 451 476
139. P.E. Wannamaker Affordable magnetotellurics: interpretation in natural environments. M. Oristaglio B. Spies Three-dimensional electromagnetics, Geophysical Developments Series vol. 7 1999 Society Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 349 374
140. P.E. Wannamaker, S.H. Ward, G.W. Hohmann, and W.R. Sill Magnetotelluric models of the Roosevelt Hot Springs thermal area, Utah. U.S. Department of Energy Report DOE/ET/27002-8 1980 University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT
141. P.E. Wannamaker, G.W. Hohmann, and S.H. Ward Magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths Geophysics 49 1984 1517 1534
142. P.E. Wannamaker, J.A. Stodt, and L. Rijo A stable finite element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 88 1987 277 296
143. P.E. Wannamaker, G.R. Jiracek, J.A. Stodt, T.G. Caldwell, V.M. Gonzalez, J.D. McKnight, and A.D. Porter Fluid generation and pathways beneath an active compressional orogen, the New Zealand Southern Alps, inferred from magnetotelluric data J. Geophys. Res. 107 2002 1 22
144. S.H. Ward, and G.W. Hohmann Electromagnetic theory for geophysical application M.N. Nabighian Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, Investigations in Geophysics Series vol. 1 1987 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa, OK 131 312
145. P. Weidelt Inversion of two-dimensional conductivity structures Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 10 1975 282 291
146. A. Weller, W. Frangos, and M. Seichter Three-dimensional inversion of induced polarization data from simulated waste J. Appl. Geophys. 41 1999 31 47
147. Wolfgram, P., Karlik, G., 1995. Conductivity-depth transform of GEOTEM data. The 11th Geophysical Conference & Exhibition. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Qld, AU, pp. 179-185 (*discussion in EGJ-26-4-549).
148. I.J. Won, A. Keiswetter, G.R.A. Fields, and L.C. Sutton GEM-2: a new multifrequency electromagnetic sensor Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 1 1996 129 137
149. Wright, D.L., Smith, D.V., Abraham, J.D., 2000. A VETEM survey of a former munitions foundry site at the Denver Federal Center. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Washington, DC. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Denver, CO, pp. 459-468.
150. Yang, X., LaBrecque, D.L., Paprocki, L., 2000. Estimation of 3D moisture content using ERT data at the Socorro-Tech Vadose Zone Facility. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Washington, DC. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Denver, CO, pp. 915-924.
151. G. Zacher, B. Tezkan, F.M. Neubauer, A. Hordt, and I. Muller Radiomagnetotellurics, a powerful tool for waste site exploration Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 1 1996 139 160
152. J. Zhang, R.L. Mackie, and T.R. Madden 3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients Geophysics 60 1995 131 1325
153. M.S. Zhdanov Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems 2002 Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands
154. Zonge, K.L., Hughes, L.J., 1991. The controlled Source Audio Magnetotelluric Method. In: Nabighian, M.N. (Ed.), Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Investigations in Geophysics, vol. 2B. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 713-810.