European mink-polecat hybridization events: Hazards from natural process?

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 89-96

  Lode T ^a   Guiral, G ^b   Peltier, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

^b Communaute Communes Haute Saintonge ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; DNA POLYMORPHISM; FRANCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HYBRIDIZATION; MATING; MINK; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; POLECAT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FERRETS; FRANCE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; ISOENZYMES; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MINK; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

MUSTELA LUTREOLA; MUSTELA VISON;

EID: 13844315521     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esi021     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, and Wenburg JK, 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613-622.
2. Arnold ML, 1992. Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 23:237-261.
3. Arnold ML, 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Arnold ML, Bulger MR, Burke JM, Hempel AL, and Williams JH, 1999. Natural hybridization: how low can you go and still be important? Ecology 80:371-381.
5. Biase FH, Franco MM, Goulart LR, and Antunes RC, 2002. Protocol for extraction of genomic DNA from swine tissues. Gen Mol Biol 25:313-315.
6. Boecklen WJ and Howard DJ, 1997. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones: numbers of markers and power of resolution. Ecology 78:2611-2616.
7. Brusgaard K, Holm LE, and Lohi O, 1998. Two polymorphic mink (Mustela vison) dinucleotide repeat loci. Anim Genet 29:468-469.
8. Cranddl KA, Bininda-Edmonds ORP, Mace GM, and Wayne RK, 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:290-295.
9. Crozier RH, 1997. Preserving the information contents of species: genetic diversity phylogeny and conservation worth. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:243-268.
10. Davison A, Griffiths HI, Brookes RC, Maran T, Macdonald DW, Sidorovich VE, Kitchener AC, Irizar I, Villate I, Gonzalez-Esteban J, Cena JC, Cena A, Moya I, and Minano SP, 2000. Mitochondrial and palaeontological evidence for origins of endangered European mink, Mustela lutreola. Anim Conserv 3:345-355.
11. Davison A, Birks JDS, Brookes RC, Messenger JE, and Griffiths HI, 2001. Mitochondrial phylogeography and population history of pine martens Martes martes compared with polecats Mustela putorius. Mol Ecol 10:2479-2488.
12. DeMarais BD, Dowling TE, Douglas ME, Minckley WL, and Marsh PC, 1992. Origin of Gila seminuda (Teleostei: cyprynadae) through introgressive hybridization: implication for evolution and conservation. PNAS USA 89:2747-2751.
13. Dowling TE and Secor CL, 1997. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:593-619.
14. Fleming MA, Ostrander EA, and Cook JA, 1999. Microsatellite markers for American mink (Mustela vison) and ermine (Mustela erminea). Mol Ecol 8:1352-1354.
15. Frankham R, Ballou JD, and Briscoe DA, 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gompper ME, Gittleman JL, and Wayne RK, 1998. Dispersal, philopatry, and genetic relatedness in a social carnivore: comparing males and females. Mol Ecol 7:157-163.
17. Gottelli D, Sillero-Zubiri C, Applebaum GD, Roy MSD, Girman J, García-Moreno J, Ostrander EA, and Wayne RK, 1994. Molecular genetics of the most endangered canid: the Ethiopian wolf, Canis simensis. Mol Ecol 3:301-312.
18. Grant PR and Grant BR, 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193-197.
19. Lodé T, 1999. Genetic bottleneck in the threatened western population of European mink Mustela lutreola. Ital J Zool 66:351-353.
20. Lodé T, 2001a. Genetic divergence without spatial isolation in polecat Mustela putorius populations. J Evol Biol 14:228-236.
21. Lodé T, 2001b. Mating system and genetic variance in a polygynous mustelid, the European polecat. Genes Genet Syst 76:221-227.
22. Lodé T, 2002. Endangered species as indicator for freshwater qualit: a fractal diagnosis using fragmentation within European mink population. Arch Hydrobiol 155:163-176.
23. Lodé T and Peltier D, 2004. Genetic neighbourhood and effective population size in the endangered European mink Mustela lutreola. Biodiv Conserv (In press).
24. Lodé T, Cormier JP, and Le Jacques D, 2001. Decline in endangered species as an indication of anthropic pressures: the case of European mink Mustela lutreola western population. Environ Manage 28:727-735.
25. Maran T and Henttonen H, 1995. Why is the European mink (Mustela lutreola) disappearing? A review of the process and hypotheses. Ann Zool Fenn 32:47-54.
26. Maran T, Macdonald DW, Kruuk H, Sidorovich V, and Rozhnov VV, 1998. The continuing decline of the European mink Mustela lutreola: evidence for the intra-guild competition hypothesis. Symp Zool Soc Lond 71:297-323.
27. Mercure A, Ralls K, Koepfli KP, and Wayne RK, 1993. Genetic subdivisions among small canids-mitochondrial-DNA differentiation of Swift, Kit, and Arctic Foxes. Evolution 47:1313-1328.
28. Moritz C, 1994. Defining evolutionarily significant units for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373-375.
29. Murphy RW, Sites JW, Buth DG, and Haufler CH, 1990. Proteins. I: isozyme electrophoresis. In: Molecular systematics (Hillis and Moritz eds.). Sunderland: Sinauer Press:45-126.
30. Nei M, Maruyama T, and Chakraborty R, 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1-10.
31. Nowak RM, 1992. The red wolf is not a hybrid. Conserv Biol 6:590-592.
32. O'Brien SJ and Mayr E, 1991. Species hybridization and protection of endangered animals. Science 253:251-252.
33. O'Connel M, Wright JM, and Farid A, 1996. Development of PCR primers for nine polymorphic American mink Mustela vison microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 5:311-312.
34. Pasteur N, Pasteur G, Bonhomme F, Catalan J, and Britton-Davidian J, 1987. Manuel technique de génétique par électrophorè se des protéines. Paris: Lavoisier.
35. Paterson HEH, 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species: collected writings. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Peltier D and Lodé T, 2003. Molecular survey of genetic diversity in endangered European mink Mustela lutreola. C R Biol 326:49-53.
37. Randler C, 2002. Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice. Anim Behav 63:103-119.
38. Reich DE, Wayne RK, and Goldstein DB, 1999. Genetic evidence for a recent origin by hybridization of red wolves. Mol Ecol 8:139-144.
39. Rhymer JM and Simberloff D, 1996. Extinction by hybridisation and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83-109.
40. Rothe GM, 1994. Electrophoresis of enzymes, laboratory methods. London: Springer-Verlag.
41. Saint-Girons MC, 1991. Le Vison sauvage Mustela lutreola en Europe. Collection Sauvegarde Naturelle 54: European Council, Brussels.
42. Sato JJ, Hosoda T, Wolsan M, Tsuchiya K, Yamamoto M, and Susuki H, 2003. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence time among Mustelids (Mammalia, Carnivora) based on nucleotide sequences of the nuclear interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein and mitochondrial cytochrome b genes. Zoolog Sci 20:243-264.
43. Sillero-Zubri C, Gottelli D, and McDonald DW, 1996. Male philopatry, extrapack copulations and inbreeding avoidance in Ethropian wolves (Canis simensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:331-340.
44. Stone G, 2000. Phylogeography, hybridization and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 15:354-355.
45. Storfer A, 1999. Gene flow and endangered species translocation: a topic revisited. Biol Cons 87:173-180.
46. Templeton A, 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Speciation and its consequences (Otte D and Endler JA, eds). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; 2-27.
47. Ternovsky DV, 1977. Biology of mustelids (Mustelidae). Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka Publication.
48. Thornhill NW, 1993. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Tumanov IL and Zverjev EL, 1986. Present distribution and number of the European mink in the USSR. Zool Zhur 65:426-435.
50. Vila C and Wayne RK, 1999. Hybridization between wolves and dogs. Conserv Biol 13:195-198.
51. Vila C, Amporin IR, Leonard JA, Posada D, Castroviejo J, Petrucci-Fonseca F, Crandall KA, Ellegren H, and Wayne RK, 1999. Mitochondrial phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus. Mol Ecol 8:2089-2103.
52. Wang R, Painter JN, and Hanski I, 2002. Amplification of DNA markers from scat samples of the least weasel Mustela nivalis nivalis. Acta Theriol 4(Warsz) 7:425-431.
53. Wayne RK and Jenks SM, 1991. Mitochondrial DNA analysis implying extensive hybridization of the endangered red wolf Canis rufus. Nature 351:565-568.
54. Wolf DE, Takebayashi N, and Rieseberg LH, 2001. Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridisation. Conserv Biol 15:1039-1053.
55. Youngman PM, 1982. Distribution and the systematics of the European mink Mustela lutreola Linnaeus 1761. Acta Zool Fenn 166:1-48.
56. Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I, Garin I, and Aihartza J, 2003. Landscape features in the habitat selection of European mink (Mustela lutreola) in south-western Europe. J Zool 260:415-421.