Synthesis of fluorescently labeled UDP-GlcNAc analogues and their evaluation as chitin synthase substrates

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1269-1275

  Yeager, Adam R ^a   Finney, Nathaniel S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOSYNTHESIS; FLUORESCENCE; FUNGI; POLYMERIZATION;

CHITIN SYNTHASE (CS); FUNGAL CELLS; SUBSTRATE MODIFICATIONS;

ENZYMES;

CHITIN SYNTHASE; URIDINE DIPHOSPHATE N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; FLUORESCENCE; FUNGAL CELL; NONHUMAN; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SYNTHESIS;

CHITIN; CHITIN SYNTHASE; FLUORESCENT DYES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; URIDINE DIPHOSPHATE N-ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE;

EID: 13844311449     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo0483670     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Orlean, P. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 5732-5739.
2. Cabib, E. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1991, 35, 170-173.
3. To date, only one alternative to the radiolabeled substrate has been reported. For an indirect assay that measures the amount of chitin bound to a wheat germ agglutinin-covered surface by monitoring the formation of a horseradish peroxidase-conjugate, see: Lucero, H. A.; Kuranda, M. J.; Bulik, D. A. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 305, 97-105.
4. Washiya, K.; Furuike, T.; Nakajima, F.; Lee, Y. C.; Nishimura, S.-I. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 283, 39-48.
5. Shedletzky, E.; Unger, C.; Delmer, D. P. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 249, 88-93.
6. Borg-von Zepelin, M.; Wagner, T. Mycoses 1995, 38, 339-347.
7. Hector, R.; Braun, P. C. J. Clin. Microb. 1986, 24, 620-624.
8. Regulatory Guide 8.29. Instructions Concerning Risks from Occupational Radiation Exposure; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Public Affairs (OPA), Washington, D.C., 20555, 1996.
9. (a) Chang, R.; Yeager, A. R.; Finney, N. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 39-41.
10. (b) Yeager, A. R.; Finney, N. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 613-618.
11. Carrano, L.; Tavecchia, P.; Sponga, F.; Spreafico, F. J. Antibiotics 1997, 50, 177-179.
12. For an example of a lectin-aminoglycoside interaction that is enhanced by the addition of a large amine substituent, see: Liang, R.; Loebach, J.; Koran, N.; Ge, M.; Thompson, C.; Yan, L.; Kahne, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1997, 94, 10554-10559.
13. Kuhn, R.; Baer, H. H.; Seeliger, A. ANN 1958, 611, 236-241.
14. A variety of anomeric protecting groups were examined (TBS, allyl, boc, etc.), and the benzyl group proved to be superior with regard to subsequent reaction selectivity and other deprotection steps.
15. Staudinger, H.; Meyer, J. Helv. Chim. Acta 1919, 2, 635.
16. Kiso, M.; Fujita, M.; Tanahashi, M.; Fujishima, Y.; Oqawa, Y.; Hasegawa, A. Carbohydr. Res. 1988, 177, 51-67.
17. Sharma, M.; Bernacki, R. J.; Paul, B.; Korytnyk, W. Carbohydr. Res. 1990, 198, 205-221.
18. Thomas, R. L.; Rutan, J. F.; Abbas, S. A.; Matta, K. L. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 189, 21-30.
19. Nicolaou, K. C.; Hummel, C. W.; Bockovich, N. J.; Wong, C.-H. Chem. Commun. 1991, 870.
20. Hecker, S. J.; Minich, M. L. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6051-6054.
21. Anantharamaiah, G. M.; Sivanandaiah, K. M. Ind. J. Chem. B 1976, 14B, 343-345.
22. Alais, J.; Veyrieres, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3345-3348.
23. Park, M. H.; Takeda, R.; Nakanishi, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3823-3824.
24. Rodebaugh, R.; Debenham, J. S.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5477-5478.
25. Elhalabi, J.; Rice, K. G. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 1935-1940.
26. Khorana, H. G.; Todd, A. R. J. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2257-2260.
27. Zamyatina, A.; Gronow, S.; Oertelt, C.; Puchberger, M.; Brade, H.; Kosma, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4150-4153.
28. Heidlas, J. E.; Lees, W. J.; Pale, P.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 146-151.
29. Wong, C.-H.; Wittman, V. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 57, 2144-2147.
30. Moffat, J. G. Methods Enzymol. 1966, 8, 136-142.
31. Medgyes, A.; Farkas, E.; Liptak, A.; Pozsgay, V. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4159-4178.
32. Bergmann, M.; Zervas, L. Chem. Ber. 1931, 64, 973-980.
33. Coward, J. K.; Lee, J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4126-4135.
34. Excoffier, G.; Gagnaire, D.; Utille, J.-P. Carbohydr. Res. 1975, 39, 368-373.
35. Khan, R.; Konowicz, P. A.; Gardossi, L.; Matulova, M.; de Gennaro, S. Austral. J. Chem. 1996, 49, 293-298.
36. 2O (φ ∼ 0.07). See Supporting Information for an expanded discussion of these calculations and assumptions.
37. Biochemical Pathways: An Atlas of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Michal, G., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1999; pp 27-44.
38. For examples of assays based on unnatural substrate incorporation followed by postglycosylation modification with a visualizing agent, see: (a) Khidekel, N.; Arndt, S.; Lamarre-Vincent, N.; Lippert, A.; Poulin-Kerstien, K. G.; Ramakrishnan, B.; Qasba, P. K.; Hsieh-Wilson, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16162-16163. (b) Hang, H. C.; Yu, C.; Pratt, M. R.; Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6-7.
39. For examples of assays based on unnatural substrate incorporation followed by postglycosylation modification with a visualizing agent, see: (a) Khidekel, N.; Arndt, S.; Lamarre-Vincent, N.; Lippert, A.; Poulin-Kerstien, K. G.; Ramakrishnan, B.; Qasba, P. K.; Hsieh-Wilson, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16162-16163. (b) Hang, H. C.; Yu, C.; Pratt, M. R.; Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6-7.