The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 378-382

  Wu, Min Kai ^a   Van Der Sluis, Luc W M ^a   Wesselink, Paul R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; DRILL; GATES GLIDDEN DRILL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; PERFORATION; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PRESSURE; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

EID: 13844305886     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Z. Ram Effectiveness of root canal irrigation Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 44 1977 306 309
2. A.C. Goerig, R.J. Michelich, and H.H. Schultz Instrumentation of root canals in molar using step-down technique J Endod 8 1982 550 554
3. L.R.G. Fava The double-flared technique: an alternative for biomechanical preparation J Endod 9 1983 76 83
4. J. Leeb Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation J Endod 9 1983 463 468
5. L.F. Mogan, and S. Montgomery An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique J Endod 10 1984 491 498
6. T.J. Fogarty, and S. Montgomery Effect of preflaring on canal transportation Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 72 1991 345 350
7. R.C. Bower Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment J Periodontol 50 1979 366 374
8. M. Abou-Rass, A. Frank, and D.H. Glick The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal J Am Dent Assoc 101 1980 792 794
9. J.D. West, and J.B. Roane Cleaning and shaping the root canal system S. Cohen R.C. Burns Pathways of the pulp 7th ed. 1998 Mosby St. Louis 203 257
10. L.S.W. Spångberg Instruments, materials, and devices S. Cohen R.C. Burns Pathways of the pulp 7th ed. 1998 Mosby St. Louis 476 531
11. J.R. Kessler, D.D. Peters, and L. Lorton Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforation using various endodontic instrumentation techniques J Endod 9 1983 439 447
12. T.L. Isom, J.G. Marshall, and J.C. Baumgartner Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring J Endod 21 1995 368 371
13. O. Zuckerman, A. Katz, R. Pilo, A. Tamse, and Z. Fuss Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96 2003 351 353
14. F.S. Weine Endodontic therapy 5th ed. 1996 Mosby St. Louis
15. C.M. Bramante, A. Berbert, and R.P. Borges A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation J Endod 13 1987 243 245
16. G. Calhoun, and S. Montgomery The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape J Endod 14 1988 273 277
17. J.T. McCann, D.L. Keller, and G.L. LaBounty A modification of the muffle model system to study root canal morphology J Endod 16 1990 114 115
18. G.B. Sydney, A. Batista, and L.L. Demelo The radiographic platform: a new method to evaluate root canal preparation in vitro J Endod 17 1991 570 572
19. M. Hülsmann, A. Gambal, and R. Bahr An improved technique for the evaluation of root canal preparation J Endod 25 1999 599 602
20. M. Hülsmann, M. Schade, and F. Schäfers A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments Int Endod J 34 2001 538 546
21. M.-K. Wu, L.W.M. Sluis van der, and P.R. Wesselink The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentin in oval canals Int Endod J 36 2003 218 224
22. S.W. Schneider A comparison of canal preparation in straight and curved root canals Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 32 1971 271 275
23. S.S. Lim, and C.J.R. Stock The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique Int Endod J 20 1987 33 39
24. M. Garala, S. Kuttler, P. Hardigan, R. Steiner-Carmi, and S. Dorn A comparison of the minimum canal wall thickness remaining following preparation using two nickel-titanium rotary systems Int Endod J 36 2003 636 642
25. C.N. Ardila, M.-K. Wu, and P.R. Wesselink Percentage of filled canal area in mandibular molars after conventional root-canal instrumentation and after a noninstrumentation technique (NIT) Int Endod J 36 2003 591 598
26. J.A. Sorenson, and J.T. Martinoff Intracanal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth J Prosthet Dent 51 1984 780 784
27. C.M. Sedgley, and H.H. Messer Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 18 1992 332 335
28. R. Pilo, G. Corcino, and A. Tamse Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared by hand and rotary instruments J Endod 24 1998 401 405
29. R. Pilo, and A. Tamse Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with Gates-Glidden and ParaPost drills J Prosthet Dent 83 2000 617 623
30. J.B. Roane, C.L. Sabala, and M.G. Duncanson The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals J Endod 11 1985 203 211