Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with hand and rotatory instruments

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 401-404

  Pilo, Raphael ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH ROOT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED EQUIPMENT; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTIN; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 0032084732     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80020-4     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Allison DA, Weber CR, Walton RE. The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. J Endodon 1979; 5:298-304.
2. Abou-Rass M, Jastrab RJ. The use of rotatory instruments as auxiliary aids to root canal preparation of molars. J Endodon 1982;8:78-82.
3. Kessler JR, Peters DD, Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforation using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endodon 1983;9:439-47.
4. Lim SS, Stock CJR. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with step back techniques. Int Endod J 1987;20: 33-9.