-
1
-
-
0028128360
-
Rationale for systematic reviews
-
C.D. Mulrow Rationale for systematic reviews BMJ 309 1994 597 599
-
(1994)
BMJ
, vol.309
, pp. 597-599
-
-
Mulrow, C.D.1
-
2
-
-
85047692188
-
Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
-
K.F. Schulz, I. Chalmers, R.J. Haynes, and D.G. Altman Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials JAMA 273 1995 408 412
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.273
, pp. 408-412
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Chalmers, I.2
Haynes, R.J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
3
-
-
0033012495
-
Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy
-
K. Linde, M. Scholz, G. Ramirez, N. Clausius, D. Melchart, and W.B. Jonas Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy J Clin Epidemiol 52 1999 631 636
-
(1999)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.52
, pp. 631-636
-
-
Linde, K.1
Scholz, M.2
Ramirez, G.3
Clausius, N.4
Melchart, D.5
Jonas, W.B.6
-
4
-
-
0032970925
-
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: Implications for the conduct of meta-analyses
-
D. Moher, D.J. Cook, A.R. Jadad, P. Tugwell, M. Moher, A. Jones, B. Pham, and T.P. Klassen Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses Health Technol Assess 3 1999 1 98
-
(1999)
Health Technol Assess
, vol.3
, pp. 1-98
-
-
Moher, D.1
Cook, D.J.2
Jadad, A.R.3
Tugwell, P.4
Moher, M.5
Jones, A.6
Pham, B.7
Klassen, T.P.8
-
5
-
-
0033610734
-
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement
-
D. Moher, D.J. Cook, S. Eastwood, I. Olkin, D. Rennie, and D.F Stroup Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement Lancet 354 1999 1896 1900
-
(1999)
Lancet
, vol.354
, pp. 1896-1900
-
-
Moher, D.1
Cook, D.J.2
Eastwood, S.3
Olkin, I.4
Rennie, D.5
Stroup, D.F.6
-
6
-
-
0034956732
-
The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews
-
A.P. Verhagen, H.C.W. de Vet, R.A. de Bie, M. Boers, and P.A. van de Brandt The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 54 2001 651 654
-
(2001)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.54
, pp. 651-654
-
-
Verhagen, A.P.1
De Vet, H.C.W.2
De Bie, R.A.3
Boers, M.4
Van De Brandt, P.A.5
-
7
-
-
0032417075
-
The Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus
-
A.P. Verhagen, H.C.W. de Vet, R.A. de Bie, A.B. Kessels, M. Boers, L.M. Bouter, and P.G. Knipschild The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus J Clin Epidemiol 51 1998 1235 1241
-
(1998)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.51
, pp. 1235-1241
-
-
Verhagen, A.P.1
De Vet, H.C.W.2
De Bie, R.A.3
Kessels, A.B.4
Boers, M.5
Bouter, L.M.6
Knipschild, P.G.7
-
8
-
-
0345583669
-
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis
-
P. Jüni, A. Witschi, R. Bloch, and M. Egger The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis JAMA 282 1999 1054 1060
-
(1999)
JAMA
, vol.282
, pp. 1054-1060
-
-
Jüni, P.1
Witschi, A.2
Bloch, R.3
Egger, M.4
-
9
-
-
0035822324
-
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
-
P. Jüni, D.G. Altman, and M. Egger Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials BMJ 323 2001 42 46
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 42-46
-
-
Jüni, P.1
Altman, D.G.2
Egger, M.3
-
10
-
-
0028488031
-
A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods
-
S. Greenland A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods Am J Epidemiol 140 1994 290 296
-
(1994)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.140
, pp. 290-296
-
-
Greenland, S.1
|