메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 311-313

An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Methodology; Quality assessment; Systemic review

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW;

EID: 13844298022     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.002     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (20)

References (10)
  • 1
    • 0028128360 scopus 로고
    • Rationale for systematic reviews
    • C.D. Mulrow Rationale for systematic reviews BMJ 309 1994 597 599
    • (1994) BMJ , vol.309 , pp. 597-599
    • Mulrow, C.D.1
  • 2
    • 85047692188 scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
    • K.F. Schulz, I. Chalmers, R.J. Haynes, and D.G. Altman Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials JAMA 273 1995 408 412
    • (1995) JAMA , vol.273 , pp. 408-412
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Chalmers, I.2    Haynes, R.J.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 5
    • 0033610734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement
    • D. Moher, D.J. Cook, S. Eastwood, I. Olkin, D. Rennie, and D.F Stroup Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement Lancet 354 1999 1896 1900
    • (1999) Lancet , vol.354 , pp. 1896-1900
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.J.2    Eastwood, S.3    Olkin, I.4    Rennie, D.5    Stroup, D.F.6
  • 7
    • 0032417075 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus
    • A.P. Verhagen, H.C.W. de Vet, R.A. de Bie, A.B. Kessels, M. Boers, L.M. Bouter, and P.G. Knipschild The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus J Clin Epidemiol 51 1998 1235 1241
    • (1998) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.51 , pp. 1235-1241
    • Verhagen, A.P.1    De Vet, H.C.W.2    De Bie, R.A.3    Kessels, A.B.4    Boers, M.5    Bouter, L.M.6    Knipschild, P.G.7
  • 8
    • 0345583669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis
    • P. Jüni, A. Witschi, R. Bloch, and M. Egger The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis JAMA 282 1999 1054 1060
    • (1999) JAMA , vol.282 , pp. 1054-1060
    • Jüni, P.1    Witschi, A.2    Bloch, R.3    Egger, M.4
  • 9
    • 0035822324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
    • P. Jüni, D.G. Altman, and M. Egger Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials BMJ 323 2001 42 46
    • (2001) BMJ , vol.323 , pp. 42-46
    • Jüni, P.1    Altman, D.G.2    Egger, M.3
  • 10
    • 0028488031 scopus 로고
    • A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods
    • S. Greenland A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods Am J Epidemiol 140 1994 290 296
    • (1994) Am J Epidemiol , vol.140 , pp. 290-296
    • Greenland, S.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.