SDOF displacement ductility demands based on smooth ground motion response spectra

Engineering Structures

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1713-1733

  Farrow, Kenneth T ^a   Kurama, Y C ^b  

^a EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Longitudinal ventilation; Model testing; Normal traffic conditions; Road tunnel; Sveti Rok tunnel

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; STATISTICAL METHODS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM (SDOF); STRUCTURE STRENGTH;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 13844292441     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-273 (ATC-33). Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1997
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 356. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC 40, 1996
4. Reinhorn A. Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes 1997 277-287 Balkema Rotterdam
5. Chopra A. Goel R. Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic demand spectrum Earthquake Spectra 15 1999 637-656
6. Tena-Colunga A. Displacement ductility demand spectra for the seismic evaluation of structures Engineering Structures 23 2001 1319-1330
7. International Code Council (ICC). International Building Code. Falls Church (VA), 2000
8. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, FEMA 302. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1998
9. International Council of Building Officials (ICBO). Uniform Building Code. Whittier (CA), 1997
10. Farrow KT, Kurama Y. Capacity-demand index relationships for performance-based seismic design. Structural Engineering Research Report #NDSE-01-02. Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 2001. Available from: http://www.nd.edu/~concrete
11. Farrow K.T. Kurama Y. SDOF demand index relationships for performance-based seismic design Earthquake Spectra 19 2003 799-838
12. Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary 6th ed. 1996
13. Uang CM. A balanced seismic steel design procedure for strength and ductility requirements. Proceedings of the 1995 Structures Congress. ACSE. 1995, p. 421-6
14. Blakeley R.W.G. Cooney R.C. Megget L.M. Seismic shear loading at flexural capacity in cantilever wall structures Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 8 1975 278-290
15. Fleischman R.B. Farrow K.T. Dynamic response of perimeter lateral-system structures with flexible diaphragms Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 30 2001 745-763
16. Newmark N. Hall W. Procedures and criteria for earthquake resistant design Building science series No. 46 1973 National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce Washington (DC)
17. Miranda E. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors Journal of Structural Engineering American Society of Civil Engineers 119 1993 3503-3519
18. Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers 126 2000 1150-1159
19. Miranda E. Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers 127 2001 1005-1012
20. Miranda E. Ruiz-Garcia J. Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 2002 539-560
21. Nassar A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. Report 95. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford (CA), 1991
22. Osteraas J, Krawinkler H. Strength and ductility considerations in seismic design. Report 90. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford (CA), 1990
23. Krawinkler H. Rahnama M. Effects of soft soil on design spectra 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1992 5841-5846
24. Hall J. Heaton T. Halling M. Wald D. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings Earthquake Spectra 11 1995 569-605
25. Naeim F. On seismic design implications of the 1994 Northridge Earthquake records Earthquake Spectra 11 1995 91-109
26. Baez J. Miranda E. Amplification factors to estimate inelastic displacement demands for the design of structures in the near field 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2000 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
27. Alavi B, Krawinkler H. Effects of near-field ground motion on frame structures. Report 138. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford (CA), 2001, p. 301
28. Chopra A. Chintanapakdee C. Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 30 2001 1769-1789
29. MacRae G. Morrow D. Roeder C. Near-fault ground motion effects on simple structures Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers 127 2001 996-1004
30. Mahin S, Bertero V. An evaluation of some methods for predicting the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings, UCB/EERC-75-5. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1975
31. Kurama Y. Simplified seismic design approach for friction-damped unbonded post-tensioned precast walls ACI Structural Journal 98 2001 705-716
32. Somerville P, Smith N, Punyamurthula S, Sun J. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project, SAC/BD-97/04. SAC: Sacramento (CA); 1997
33. McCann M. Shah H. Determining strong-motion duration of earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 69 1979 1253-1265
34. Frankel A, Mueller C, Barnhard T, Perkins D, Leyendecker E, Dickman N, et al. National seismic hazard maps, June 1996: Documentation. US Geological Survey, Open-file Report 96-532, 1996.
35. Idriss IM, Sun JI. Users' manual for SHAKE91. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, 1992.
36. Bardet JP, Ichii K, Lin CH. EERA: A computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits [WWW Document]. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California. Available from: http://geoinfo.usc.edu/gees/Software/EERA2000/Default.htm, 2000
37. US Geological Survey. USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project [WWW Document]. Available from: http://eqhazmaps.usgs.gov/, 1996
38. Matlab. Natick (MA): The Math Works, Inc.; 2000.
39. Farrow KT. CDSPEC [WWW Document]. Available from: http://www.nd.edu/~concrete, December 2001.
40. Chopra A. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering 1995 Prentice Hall, Inc New Jersey
41. Prakash V, Powell G, Campbell S. DRAIN-2DX base program description and user guide: Version 1.10, UBC/SEMM-93/17. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley (CA), 1993.
42. Hachem M. BISPEC [WWW Document]. Available from: http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~hachem/bispec, 2000.
43. Astarlioglu S. Memari A. Scanlon A. Use of inelastic design spectra in seismic design of precast concrete wall panel structures 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1998 EERI Seattle, Oakland CD-ROM
44. Lam N. Wilson J. Hutchinson G. The ductility reduction factor in the seismic design of buildings Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 27 1998 749-769
45. Shome N. Cornell C. Bazzurro P. Carballo J. Earthquakes, records, and responses Earthquake Spectra 14 1998 469-500
46. Kurama Y. Farrow K.T. Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 32 2003 2425-2450