SDOF Demand Index Relationships for Performance-Based Seismic Design

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 799-838

  Farrow, Kenneth T ^a   Kurama, Yahya C ^b  

^a EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; CORRELATION METHODS; DUCTILITY; ELASTICITY; HYSTERESIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOILS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; YIELD STRESS;

FORCE REDUCTION; RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENT;

SEISMOLOGY;

EID: 0345759544     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1622955     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Al-Sulaimani, G., and Roessett, J., 1985. Design spectra for degrading systems, J. Struct. Eng. 111 (12), 2611-2623.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
3. Bates, D., and Watts, D., 1988. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
4. Bendat, J., and Piersol, A., 1986. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Borzi, B., and Elnashai, A., 2000. Refined force reduction factors for seismic design, Eng. Struct. 22 (10), 1244-1260.
6. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 1998. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1 - Provisions and Part 2 - Commentary, FEMA-302 and FEMA-303, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
7. Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A., and Folz, B., 2002. Seismic response of self-centering hysteretic SDOF systems, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (5), 1131-1150.
8. Chopra, A., 1995. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Chopra, A., and Goel, R., 1999. Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic demand spectrum, Earthquake Spectra 15 (4), 637-656.
10. Clough, R., and Penzien, J., 1993. Dynamics of Structures, Second Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Elghadamsi, F., and Mohraz, B., 1987. Inelastic earthquake spectra, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 15 (1), 91-104.
12. Fajfar, P., 1999. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic spectra, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28 (9), 979-993.
13. Farrow, K., 2001. CDSPEC, (WWW Document), URL http://www.nd.edu/̃concrete
14. Farrow, K., and Kurama, Y., 2001. Capacity-demand index relationships for performance-based seismic design, Structural Engineering Research Report #NDSE-01-02, Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN (available for download at http://www.nd.edu/̃concrete).
15. Frankel, A., Mueller, C., Barnhard, T., Perkins, D., Leyendecker, E., Dickman, N., Hanson, S., and Hopper, M., 1996. National Seismic Hazard Maps, June 1996: Documentation, U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 96-532.
16. Ghobarah, A., Abou-Elfath, H., and Biddah, A., 1999. Response-based assessment of structures, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28 (1), 79-104.
17. Hall, J., Heaton, T., Halling, M., and Wald, D., 1995. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings, Earthquake Spectra 11 (4), 569-605.
18. International Code Council (ICC), 2000. International Building Code 2000, Falls Church, VA.
19. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), 1997. Uniform Building Code, Whittier, CA.
20. Kurama, Y., 2001. Simplified seismic design approach for friction-damped unbonded post-tensioned precast walls, ACI Struct. J. 98 (5), 705-716.
21. Kurama, Y., and Farrow, K., 2003. Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (15) 2425-2450.
22. Kwan, W., and Billington, S., 1999. Seismic behavior of precast concrete pier cap-beam-to-column joints with horizontal and vertical prestressing, Earthquake Engineering: Eighth Canadian Conference, 439-444.
23. Lin, J., and Mahin, S., 1985. Effect of inelastic behavior on the analysis and design of earthquake resistant structures, Report No. UCB/EERC-85/08, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, June.
24. Loh, C., and Ho, R., 1990. Seismic damage assessment based on different hysteretic rules, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19 (5), 753-771.
25. MacRae, G., and Kawashima, K., 1997. Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26 (7), 701-716.
26. Mahin, S., and Bertero, V., 1975. An evaluation of some methods for predicting the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings, Report No. UCB/EERC-75-5, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
27. Mahin, S., and Lin, J., 1983. Construction of inelastic response spectra for single degree of freedom systems, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/17, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
28. MATLAB, 2000. The Math Works, Inc., Natick, MA.
29. McCann, M., and Shah, H., 1979. Determining strong-motion duration of earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 69 (4), 1253-1265.
30. Miranda, E., 1993. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors, J. Struct. Eng. 119 (12), 3503-3519.
31. Miranda, E., 2000. Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites, J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10), 1150-1159.
32. Montgomery, D., and Peck, E., 1991. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
33. Naeim, F., 1995. On seismic design implications of the 1994 Northridge earthquake records, Earthquake Spectra 11 (1), 91-109.
34. Nassar, A., and Krawinkler, H., 1991. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 95, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ., June.
35. Newmark, N., and Hall, W., 1973. Procedures and Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design, Building Sci. Series No. 46, Natl. Bureau of Standards, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington D.C.
36. Newmark, N., and Riddell, R., 1980. Inelastic spectra for seismic design, Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 4, 129-136.
37. Osteraas, J., and Krawinkler, H., 1990. Strength and ductility considerations in seismic design, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 90, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ., Aug.
38. Priestley, M., and Tao, J., 1993. Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frames with partially debonded tendons, PCI J. 38 (1), Jan.-Feb., 58-69.
39. Rahnama, M., and Krawinkler, H., 1993. Effects of soft soil and hysteresis model on seismic demands, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 108, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ., July.
40. Reinhorn, A., 1997. Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler (editors), Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Balkema, Rotterdam, 277-287.
41. Shome, N., Cornell, C., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J., 1998. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses, Earthquake Spectra 14 (3), 469-500.
42. Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, J., 1997. Development of ground motion time histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project, Report SAC/BD-97/04, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA.