Results of multi-instrumental experiment in automated hematology: State of the art;Risultati della sperimentazione multistrumentale in ematologia automatizzata: Lo stato dell'arte

Rivista di Medicina di Laboratorio

Volumn 5, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2004, Pages 136-141

  Buttarello, Mauro ^a,b   Cappelletti, P ^c   Biasioli, B ^c   Bulian, P ^c   Casolari, B ^c   Cenci, A ^c   Da Rin, G ^c   Doretto, P ^c   Feruglio, C ^c   Miconi, V ^c   Pasini, L ^c   Piccinini, C ^c   Piva, E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b S ANTONIO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFERENCE PAPER; FLUORESCENCE; HEMATOLOGY; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; LEUKOCYTE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; POLARIZATION; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 13744255581     PISSN: 15923479     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference leukocyte differential count (proportional) and evaluation of instrumental methods. Approved standard H20-A. Wayne (PA): NCCLS; 1992.
2. National Committee for clinical Laboratory standards. Methods for reticulocyte counting (flow cytometry and supravital dyes). Approved guideline H44-A. Wayne (PA): NCCLS; 1997.
3. Hübl W, Wolfbauer G, Andert S, et al. Toward a new reference method for the leukocyte five-part differential. Cytometry (communications in clinical cytometry) 1997; 30: 72-84.
4. Houwen B. The differential cell count. Lab hematol 2001; 7: 89-100.
5. International Council for Standardization in Haematology. Expert panel on cytometry. Guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker applications. Clin Lab Haematol 1994; 16: 157-74.
6. Buttarello M, Lorenz C, Gadotti M, et al. Evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers. A comparative study of differential count (imprecision and inaccuracy). Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 97: 345-52.
7. Buttarello M, Bulian P, Farina G, et al. Flow cytometric reticulocyte counting. Parallel evaluation of five fully automated analyzers: an NCCLS-ICSH approach. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115: 100-11.
8. Buttarello M, Lorenz C, Gadotti M, et al. Diagnostic performance. A comparative study of the leucocyte differential on four automated haematology analysers. Eur J Clin Chem Biochem 1993; 31: 251-8.
9. Van Den Bossche J, Devreese K, Malfait R, et al. Reference intervals for a complete blood count determined on different automated haematology analyzers: ABX Pentra 120, Coulter Gen-S, Sysmex Se 9500, Abbott Cell Dyn 4000 and Bayer Advia 120. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40: 69-73.
10. Zarev PV, Davis BH. Comparative study of monocyte enumeration by flow cytometry: improved detection by combining monocyte-related antibodies with anti-CD 163. Lab Hematol 2004; 10: 24-31.
11. Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Libeer JC, Ricos C. Proposal for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology. Ann Clin Biochem 1997; 34: 8-12.
12. Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P. Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 321-3.
13. Statland BE, Winkel P, Harris SC, Burdsall MJ, Saunders AM. Evaluation of biologic sources of variation of leukocyte counts and other hematologic quantities using very precise automated analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 69: 48-54.
14. Richardson Jones A, Twedt D, Swaim W, Gottfried E. Diurnal change of blood count analytes in normal subjects. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106: 723-7.
15. Buttarello M, GdSE-SIMeL. Variabilità biologica dei parametri ematologici. Riv Med Lab 2003; 4 (suppl. 1): 88-91.