Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 492-496

  Shapira, Joseph ^a   Kupietzky, Ari ^a   Kadari, Avishag ^b   Fuks, Anna B ^a   Holan, Gideon ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Hydroxyzine; Midazolam; Pediatric dentistry; Sedation

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYZINE; HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT; INHALATION ANESTHETIC AGENT; MIDAZOLAM; NITROUS OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; CRYING; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; INFANT; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMEDICATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SLEEP;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; CRYING; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; HYDROXYZINE; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INFANT; MIDAZOLAM; MOVEMENT; NITROUS OXIDE; PREANESTHETIC MEDICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SLEEP;

EID: 13744250755     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kupietzky A, Houpt MI. Midazolam: A review of its use for conscious sedation of children. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:237-241.
2. Hartgraves PM, Primosch RE. An evaluation of oral and nasal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation. J Dent Child. 1994;61175-181.
3. Primosch RE, Bender F. Factors associated with administration route when using midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation J Dent Child. 2001;68:233-238.
4. Kupietzky A, Holan, G, Shapiro J. Intranasal midazolam better at effecting amnesia after sedation than oral hydroxyzine: A pilot study. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:32-34.
5. Shapira J, Holan G, Botzer A, Kupietzky A, Tal E, Fuks AB. The effectiveness of midazolam and hydroxyzine as sedative agents for young pediatric dental patients. J Dent Child. 1996;63:421-425.
6. Hasty MF, et al. Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients: An investigation of choral hydrate, hydroxyzine pamoate, and meperidine versus chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:10-19.
7. Musial KM, Wilson S, Preisch, Weaver J. Comparison of the efficacy of oral midazolam alone versus midazolam and meperidine in the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:468-474.
8. Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child. 1962;29:150-163.
9. Chambers WL, Fields HW, Machen JB. Measuring selected disruptive behaviors of the 36- to 60-monthold patient. Part 1: Development and assessment of a rating scale. Pediatr Dent. 1981;3:251-256.
10. Houpt M, Kupietzky A, Tofsky N, Koenigsberg SR. Effects of nitrous oxide on diazepam sedation of young children. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:236-241.
11. Nathan JE, Vargas KG. Oral midazolam with and without meperidine for management of the difficult young pediatric dental patient: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:129-138.
12. Moore PA. Adverse drug interactions in dental practice: Interactions associated with local anesthetics, sedatives and anxiolytics, Part IV of a series. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130:541-554.
13. Shapira J, Holan G, Guelman M, et al. Evaluation of the effect of nitrous oxide and hydroxyzine in controlling the behavior of the pediatric patient. Pediatr Dent. 1992;14:167-170.