Loop electroexcision procedure with the fischer excisor versus the Utah loop in a residency training program

Journal of Pelvic Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 330-334

  Rosen, Andrew P ^a   Hernandez, Enrique ^a   Shen, Ting ^a   Gaughan, John P ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13644264088     PISSN: 10772847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Simmons JR, Anderson L, Hernandez E, et al. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. J Reprod Med 43: 1007, 1998.
2. Jones HW III, Buller RE. The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cone biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137: 882, 1980.
3. Cartier R. Practical colonoscopy, 2nd ed. Paris, Laboratorie Cartier, 1984, p. 139.
4. Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96: 1054, 1989.
5. Scribner DR, Jr, Fischer NR, Gagliardi S, et al. Evaluation of a new instrument designed for directed cervical excision: cone biopsy excisor. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 2: 7, 1998.
6. Fischer NR, Alexanderian D, Gagliardi S, et al. The Fischer Cone Biopsy Excisor compared with the large loop electrode for cervical conization. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 3: 180 1999.
7. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 54: 175, 1994.
8. Krebs Hans B, Pastore L, Helmkamp B. Loop electrosurgical excision procedures for cervical dysplasia: Experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169: 289, 1993.