Evaluation of a new instrument designed for directed cervical excision: Cone biopsy excisor

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 7-11

  Scribner, Dennis R ^a  

^a HARTFORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical dysplasia; Electrosurgery

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038398096     PISSN: 10892591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00128360-199801000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Cartier R, Sopena B, Cartier I. Use of the diathermy loop in the diagnosis and treatment of lesions of the uterine cervix [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress, 1981.
2. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: Cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 1994;54:175-9.
3. Oyesany O, Amerasinghe C, Dermot Manning E. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold knife conization for the management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol 1993;50:84-8.
4. Gunasekera P, Philips J, Lewis B. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: A superior mode of treatment. Br] Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:995-8.
5. Montz F, Holschneider C, Thompson D. Large loop excision of the transformation zone: Effect on the pathologic interpretation of resection margins. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:976-82.