Bayesian inference for spatially inhomogeneous pairwise interacting point processes

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-18

  Bognar, Matthew A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Gibbs point process; Importance sampling; Inhomogeneous pairwise interacting point process; Metropolis Hastings algorithm; Reversible jump MCMC; Spatial point pattern

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA REDUCTION; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

BAYESIAN INFERENCE; GIBBS POINT PROCESS; IMPORTANCE SAMPLING; INHOMOGENEOUS PAIRWISE INTERACTING POINT PROCESS; METROPOLIS-HASTING ALGORITHM; REVERSIBLE JUMP MCMC; SPATIAL POINT PATTERN;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 13644251916     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baddeley A., Turner R. Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns. Austral. New Zealand J. Statist. 42:2000;283-322
2. Besag J., Milne R., Zachary S. Point process limits of lattice processes. J. Appl. Probab. 19:1982;210-216
3. Bognar M.A., Cowles M.K. Bayesian inference for pairwise interacting point processes. Statist. Comput. 14:2004;109-117
4. Brooks S., Gelman A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 7:1998;434-455
5. Brooks, S., Giudici, P., 1999. Convergence assessment for reversible jump MCMC simulations. In: Bernardo, J.M., Berger, J.O., Dawid, A.P., Smith, A.F.M. (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 733-742.
6. Carter D.S., Prenter P.M. Exponential spaces and counting processes. Z. Wahr. verw. Geb. 21:1972;1-19
7. Chen M.-H., Shao Q.-M. On Monte Carlo methods for estimating ratios of normalizing constants. Ann. Statist. 25:1997;1563-1594
8. Diggle P.J. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. 2nd Edition:2003;Arnold, Paris
9. Diggle P.J., Gates D.J., Stibbard A. A nonparametric estimator for pairwise interaction point processes. Biometrika. 74:1987;763-770
10. Diggle P.J., Fiksel T., Grabarnik P., Ogata Y., Stoyan D., Tanemura M. On parameter estimation for pairwise interaction point processes. Internat. Statist. Rev. 62:1994;99-117
11. Fiksel T. Estimation of parameterized pair potentials of marked and unmarked Gibbsian point processes. Elektron. Inform. Kybernet. 20:1984;270-278
12. Gates D.J., Westcott M. Clustering estimates for spatial point distributions with unstable potentials. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 38:1986;123-135
13. Gelman A., Meng X.-L. Simulating normalizing constants. from importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling Statist. Sci. 13:1998;163-185
14. Gelman A., Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. (with discussion) Statist. Sci. 7:1992;457-511
15. Gelman, A., Roberts, G.O., Gilks, W.R., 1996. Efficient Metropolis jumping rules. In: Bernardo, J.M., Berger, A.P., Dawid, A.P., Smith, A.F.M. (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 599-607.
16. Geyer C.J. Likelihood inference for spatial point processes. Barndorff-Nielsen O.E., Kendall W.S., van Lieshout M.N.M. Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation. 1999;79-140 Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
17. Geyer C.J., M ø ller J. Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes. Scand. J. Statist. 21:1994;359-373
18. Green P.J. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika. 82:1995;711-732
19. Green P.J., Sibson R. Computing Dirichlet tesselations in the plane. Comput. J. 21:1978;168-173
20. Harkness R.D., Isham V. A bivariate spatial point pattern of ants' nests. Appl. Statist. 32:1983;293-303
21. Hastings W.K. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika. 57:1970;97-109
22. Heikkinen J., Arjas E. Non-parametric Bayesian estimation of a spatial Poisson intensity. Scand. J. Statist. 25:1998;435-450
23. Heikkinen J., Penttinen A. Bayesian smoothing in the estimation of the pair potential function of Gibbs point patterns. Bernoulli. 5:1999;1119-1136
24. Jensen, E.B.V., Nielsen, L.S., 2001. A review on inhomogeneous spatial point processes. In: Basawa, I.V., Heyde, C.C. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the Symposium on Inference for Stochastic Processes, Vol. 37. IMS Lecture Notes, pp. 297-318.
25. Kelly F.P., Ripley B.D. On Strauss' model for clustering. Biometrika. 63:1976;357-360
26. Kendall W.S., M ø ller J. Perfect simulation using dominating processes on ordered spaces, with application to locally stable point processes. Adv. Appl. Probab. 32:2000;844-865
27. Mateu J., Montes F. Likelihood inference for Gibbs processes in the analysis of spatial point patterns. Internat. Statist. Rev. 69:2001;81-104
28. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H., Teller E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1953;1087-1091
29. M ø ller J. Markov chain Monte Carlo and spatial point processes. Barndorff-Nielsen O.E., Kendall W.S., van Lieshout M.N.M. Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation. 1999;141-172 Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
30. M ø ller, J., Nicholls, G.K., 1999. Perfect simulation for sample-based inference. Research Report R-99-2011, http://www.math.auc.dk/%7Ejm/ perfect.sim.temp.ps.gz, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University. To appear in: Statistics and Computing, (conditionally accepted). Statist. Comput., to appear.
31. M ø ller, J., Nicholls, G.K., 1999. Perfect simulation for sample-based inference. Research Report R-99-2011, http://www.math.auc.dk/%7Ejm/ perfect.sim.temp.ps.gz, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University. To appear in: Statistics and Computing, (conditionally accepted). Statist. Comput., to appear.
32. M ø ller J., Waagepetersen R.P. Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes. 2003;Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
33. Ogata Y., Tanemura M. Estimation of interaction potentials of spatial point patterns through the maximum likelihood procedure. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 33:1981;315-338
34. Ogata Y., Tanemura M. Likelihood analysis of spatial point patterns. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B. 46:1984;496-518
35. Ogata Y., Tanemura M. Likelihood estimation of interaction potentials and external fields of inhomogeneous spatial point patterns. Francis I.S., Manly B.F.J., Lam F.C. Proceedings of the Pacific Statistical Congress. 1986;150-154 Elsevier, Amsterdam
36. Ogata Y., Tanemura M. Likelihood estimation of soft-core interaction potentials for Gibbsian point patterns. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 41:1989;583-600
37. O'Sullivan D., Unwin D.J. Geographic Information Analysis. 2003;Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey
38. Penttinen A.K. Modeling interaction in spatial point patterns. parameter estimation by the maximum likelihood method Jyväskylä Stud. Comput. Sci. Econom. Statist. 7:1984
39. Ripley B.D. Modeling spatial patterns. (with discussion) J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B. 39:1977;172-212
40. Ripley B.D. Statistical Inference for Spatial Point Processes. 1988;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
41. Smith, B.J., 2001. Bayesian Output Analysis (BOA) software. Copyright (c) 2001 Brian J. Smith, http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/boa.
42. Smith A.F.M., Gelfand A.E. Bayesian statistics without tears. a sampling resampling perspective Amer. Statist. 46:1992;84-88
43. Stoyan D., Stoyan H. Non-homogeneous Gibbs process models for forestry - a case study. Biometrical J. 40:1998;521-531
44. Strauss D. A model for clustering. Biometrika. 62:1975;467-475
45. Takacs R. Estimator for the pair-potential of a Gibbsian point process. Math. Oper. Statist. Ser. Statist. 17:1986;429-433
46. van Lieshout M.N.M. Markov Point Processes and Their Applications. 2000;Imperial College Press, London
47. Voronoi M.G. Nouvelles applications des paramèters continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. J. Reine Angew. Math. 134:1908;198-287