Nodal quasiparticles and antinodal charge ordering in Ca 2-xNaxCuO2Cl2

Science

Volumn 307, Issue 5711, 2005, Pages 901-904

  Shen, Kyle M ^a   Ronning, F ^a,e   Lu, D H ^a   Baumberger, F ^a   Ingle, N J C ^a   Lee, W S ^a   Meevasana, W ^a   Kohsaka, Y ^b   Azuma, M ^c   Takano, M ^c   Takagi, H ^b,d   Shen, Z X ^a  

^a SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d INST OF PHYS AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH   (Japan)

^e LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; COPPER COMPOUNDS; ELECTRIC CHARGE; ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES; HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS; PHOTOEMISSION; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

HIGH-TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; MOMENTUM ANISTROPY; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY GAP; TUNNELING MEASUREMENT;

CALCIUM COMPOUNDS;

CALCIUM; CHLORIDE; COPPER COMPLEX; SODIUM;

CONDUCTIVITY;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; EXCITATION; FLAME PHOTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SUPERCONDUCTOR; THEORETICAL MODEL;

PUFFINUS AURICULARIS;

EID: 13644250177     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1103627     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. T. Timusk, B. Statt, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 61 (1999).
2. I. Affleck, J. B. Marston, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3774 (1988).
3. J. Zaanen, O. Gunnarsson, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7391 (1989).
4. J. M. Tranquada et al., Nature 375, 561 (1995).
5. V. J. Emery, S. A. Kivelson, H. Q. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 475 (1990).
6. T. Hanaguri et al., Nature 430, 1001 (2004).
7. Y. Kohsaka et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 12275 (2002).
8. K. Waku et al., Phys. Rev. B 70, 134501 (2004).
9. L. F. Mattheiss, Phys. Rev. B 42, 354 (1990).
10. The observed discrepancy between the nominal Na composition and the area enclosed in the contours shown in Fig. 1, C and D, could imply that the experimentally extracted contours may not represent a true FS in the strict Fermi liquid sense, possibly because of the broad antinodal excitations.
11. A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, Z.-X. Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003).
12. D. S. Dessau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2160 (1991).
13. D. H. Lu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4370 (2001).
14. T. Yoshida et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 027001 (2003).
15. X. J. Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187001 (2004).
16. V. Brouet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126405 (2004).
17. T. Nakagawa et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 241401 (2003).
18. Y.-D. Chuang, A. D. Gromko, D. S. Dessau, T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, Science 292, 1509 (2001).
19. M. B. Salamon, M. Jaime, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 583 (2001).
20. Y. Ando, A. N. Lavrov, S. Komiya, K. Segawa, X. F. Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 017001 (2001).
21. M. Vershinin et al., Science 303, 1995 (2004).
22. J. E. Hoffman et al., Science 295, 466 (2002).
23. K. McElroy et al., in preparation; preprint available at http://arxiv.org/cond-mat/0404005.
24. H. C. Fu, J. C. Davis, D.-H. Lee, in preparation; preprint available at http://arxiv.org/cond-mat/0403001.
25. M. I. Salkola, V. J. Emery, S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 155 (1996).
26. A. M. Gabovich, A. I. Voitenko, J. F. Annett, M. Ausloos, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14, R1 (2001).
27. S. Sachdev, Science 288, 47S (2000).
28. H.-D. Chen, O. Vafek, A. Yazdani, S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 187002 (2004).
29. A. S. Mishchenko, N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 036402 (2004).
30. K. M. Shen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 267002 (2004).
31. V. Perebeinos, P. B. Allen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5178 (2000).
32. We thank N. P. Armitage, H.-D. Chen, A. Damascelli, J. C. Davis, T. P. Devereaux, H. Eisaki, T. Hanaguri, J. P. Hu, D.-H. Lee, N. Nagaosa, T. Sasagawa, O. Vafek, S. C. Zhang, and X. J. Zhou for enlightening discussions. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory is operated by the Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Science under contract DE-AC03-765F00515. K.M.S. acknowledges Stanford Graduate Fellowships and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for their support. The ARPES measurements at Stanford were also supported by NSF DMR-0304981 and Office of Naval Research N00014-98-1-0195.