Evaluation of clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament surgery

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 76-84

  Zelle, Boris A ^a   Herzka, Andrea S ^a   Harner, Christopher D ^a   Irrgang, James J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament; Clinical outcome; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; JOINT LAXITY; JOINT STABILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; LIGAMENT SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 13544271073     PISSN: 10486666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.oto.2004.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Dobrzykowski EA: The methodology of outcomes measurement. J Rehabil Outcomes 1:8-17, 1997
2. Irrgang JJ: Outcomes in sports medicine: Classification schemes for physical impairments, functional limitations and disability. Project Focus 96. The Conference on Sports Related Injury. Presented by the Foundation for Physical Therapy, 1996
3. Nagi SZ: Disability concepts revisited: Implication for prevention, in Pope AM, Tarlov AR (eds): Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington DC, National Academy Press, 1991, pp 309-327
4. World Health Organization: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2001
5. Goldstein MS, Elliott SD, Guccione AA: The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy. Phys Ther 80:853-863, 2000
6. National Institutes of Health: National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation Research, Draft V: Report and Plan for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, 1992
7. Jette AM: Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Phys Ther 74:380-386, 1994
8. Verbrugge L, Jette AM: The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 38:1-14, 1994
9. Ware JE Jr., Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473-483, 1992
10. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL: Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118:622-629, 1993
11. Kessler RC, Mroczek DK: Measuring the effects of medical interventions. Med Care 33:AS109-AS119, 1995
12. McSweeny AJ, Creer TL: Health related quality-of-life assessment in medical care. Disease Month 41:6-71, 1995
13. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833-1840, 1988
14. Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintoch H, et al: The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 26:764-772, 1998
15. Tegner Y, Lysholm J: Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43-49, 1985
16. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW: Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 27:402-416, 1999
17. Noyes FR, McGinnis GH, Mooar LA: Functional disability in the anterior cruciate insufficient knee syndrome: Review of knee rating systems and projected risk factors in determining treatment. Sports Med 1:278-302, 1984
18. Mohtadi N: Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 26:350-359, 1998
19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, et al: Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. J Rheumatol 28:400-405, 2001
20. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al: Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14:128-146, 2001
21. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:587-594, 2002
22. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al: The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271-273, 1980
23. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, et al: The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther 79:371-383, 1999
24. Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, et al: Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1132-1145, 1998
25. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al: Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 29:600-613, 2001
26. Marx RG, Jones EC, Allen AA, et al: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1459-1469, 2001
27. Lysholm J, Gillquist J: Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150-154, 1982
28. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Scoring Algorithms for the lower limb outcomes data collection instrument, version 2.0. Rosemont,IL, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1998
29. Anderson AF: Rating scales, in Fu FH, Harner CD, Vince KL (eds): Knee Surgery. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1994, pp 275-296
30. Bollen S, Seedhom BB: A comparison of the Lysholm and Cincinnati knee scoring questionnaires. Am J Sports Med 19:189-190, 1991
31. Feagin JA Jr, Blake WP: Postoperative evaluation and result recording in the anterior cruciate reconstructed knee. Clin Orthop 172:143-147, 1983
32. Sgaglione NA, Del Pizzo W, Fox JM, et al: Critical analysis of knee ligament rating systems. Am J Sports Med 23:660-667, 1995
33. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, et al: Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226-234, 1993
34. Snyder-Mackler L, Fitzgerald GK, Bartolozzi AR, et al: The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 25:191-195, 1997
35. Pantano KJ, Irrgang JJ, Burdett R, et al: A pilot study on the relationship between physical impairment and activity restriction in persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol and Arthrosc 9:369-378, 2001
36. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, et al: Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629-634, 2004
37. Hara K, Kubo T, Suginoshito T, et al: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a double bundle. Arthroscopy 16:860-864, 2000
38. Marcacci M, Molgora AP, Zaffagnini S, et al: Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings. Arthroscopy 19:540-546, 2003
39. Pederzini L, Adriani E, Botticella C, et al: Double tibial tunnel using quadriceps tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16:E9, 2000
40. Tekeuchi R, Saito T, Mituhashi S, et al: Double-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-hamstring-bone composite graft. Arthroscopy 18:550-555, 2002
41. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, et al: Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660-666, 2002
42. Felson DT,NLawrence RA, Dieppe PA, et al: Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: The disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 133:635-646, 2000
43. Sharma L: Local factors in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 13:441-446, 2001
44. Gelber AC, Hochberg MC, Mead LA, et al: Joint injury in young adults and risk for subsequent hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med 133:321-328, 2000
45. Gillquist J, Messner K: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and long-term incidence of gonarthrosis. Sports Med 27:143-156, 1999
46. Logan MC, Williams A, Lavelle J, et al: Tibiofemoral kinematics following successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using dynamic multiple resonance imaging. J Am Sports Med 32:984-992, 2004
47. Patel VV, Hall K, Ries M, et al: A three-dimensional MRI analysis of knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 22:283-292, 2004
48. Whyte J: Toward a methodology for rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 73:428-435, 1994
49. Kirshner B, Guyatt G: A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38:27-36, 1985
50. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, et al: Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther 18:979-992, 1996
51. Testa MA, Nackley JF: Methods for quality-of-life studies. Ann Rev Public Health 15:535-559, 1994
52. Testa MA, Simonson DC: Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 334:835-840, 1996
53. Messick S: Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Res 18:5-11, 1989
54. Crocker L, Algina J: Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX, Jovanovich College Publishers, Harcourt Brace, 1986
55. Beaton DE: Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 25:3192-3199, 2000
56. Stratford PW, BinkSey JM, Riddle DL: Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 76:1109-1123, 1996