Providing technical assistance to improve student performance: Insights from the Collaborative inquiry project

Theory into Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 63-71

  Garcia, Juanita ^a   Donmoyer, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13544259878     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4401_9     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Blaze, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of leadership: From control to empowerment. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Cronbach, L. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 116-127.
3. Cronbach, L. (1982). Prudent aspirations of social inquiry. In W. Kruskal (Ed.), The social sciences: Their nature and lines (pp. 42-54). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Donmoyer, R. (1993). At-risk students: Insights from/about research. In R. Donmoyer & E. Kos (Eds.), At-risk students: Portraits, policies, programs, and practices (pp. 7-36). Albany: University of New York Press.
5. Donmoyer, R., & Yennie-Donmoyer, J. (1995). Data as drama: Reflections on the use of readers theater as mode of qualitative data display. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 402-408.
6. Edmonds, R. (1984). School effects and teacher effects. Social Policy, 15, 37-39.
7. Fetterman, D. (1981). Blaming the victim: The problem of evaluation design and federal involvement and reinforcing world views of education. Human Organization, 40, 67-77.
8. Garcia Wagstaff, J. (2002). Baskin elementary school: Hope for urban education. In J. Johnson (Ed.), A study of nine high-performing, high poverty urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
9. Goodlad, J., & Klein, F. (1970). Behind the classroom door. Worthington, OH: C. Jones.
10. House, E., Glass, G., McLean, L., & Walker, D. (1978). No simple answer: Critique of the follow through evaluation. Educational Leadership, 35, 462.
11. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Newman, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators. Center on Organization and Restructuring Schools, University of Wisconsin-Madison: U.S. Department of Education, OERI.R117Q00005-95.
13. Posgrow, S. (1998). What is an exemplary program, and why should anyone care: A reaction to Slavin and Klein. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 22-29.
14. Posgrow, S. (1999). Rejoinder: Consistent large gains and high levels of achievement are the best measures of program quality: Posgrow responds to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 28(8), 24-26, 31.
15. Posgrow, S. (2000a). Success for all does not produce success for students. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 67-81.
16. Posgrow, S. (2000b). The unsubstantiated "success" of success for all. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 596-601.
17. Rivlin, A. (1973). Social experiments: The promise and the problem. Brookings Bulletin, 10, 6-9.
18. Riviln, A., & Timpane, M. (1975). Planned variation studies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
19. Slavin, R. (1999). Rejoinder: Yes, control groups are essential in program evaluation: A response to Posgrow. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 36-38.
20. Slavin, R., & Madden, N. (2000). Research on achievement outcomes of success for all Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 38-49.
21. Wasley, P., Donmoyer, R., & Maxwell, L. (1995). Navigating change in math and science classrooms: Lessons teachers taught us. Theory Into Practice, 34, 51-59.