The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution

Weed Science

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 364-373

  Cardina, John ^a   Johnson, Gregg A ^b   Sparrow, Denise H ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Geostatistics; Patchiness; Spatial pattern; Variography

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030750698     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500092997     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. Audsley, E. 1993. Operational research analysis of patch spraying. Crop Prot. 12:111-118.
2. Ballare, C. L., A. L. Scopel, C. M. Ghersa, and R. A. Sanchez. 1987a. The demography of Datura ferox (L.) in soybean crops. Weed Res. 27:91-102.
3. Ballare, C. L., A. L. Scopel, C. M. Ghersa, and R. A. Sanchez. 1987b. The population ecology of Datura ferox in soybean crops. A simulation approach incorporating seed dispersal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 19: 177-188.
4. Bigwood, D. W. and D. W. Inouye. 1988. Spatial pattern analysis of seed banks: An improved method and optimized sampling. Ecology 69: 497-507.
5. Brain, P. and R. Cousens. 1990. The effect of weed distribution on predictions of yield loss. J. Appl. Ecol. 27:735-742.
6. Cantrell, R. S. and C. Cosner. 1991. The effects of spatial heterogeneity in population dynamics. J. Math. Biol. 29:315-338.
7. Cardina, J., D. H. Sparrow, and E. L. McCoy. 1995. Analysis of spatial distribution of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:258-268.
8. Cardina, J., D. H. Sparrow, and E. L. McCoy. 1996. Spatial relationships between seedbank and seedling populations of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and annual grasses. Weed Sci. 44:298-308.
9. Carson, H. W., L. W. Lass, and R. H. Callihan. 1995. Detection of yellow hawkweed (Hieracium pratense) with high resolution multispectral digital imagery. Weed Technol. 9:477-483.
10. Cousens, R., P. Brain, J. T. O'Donovan, and P. A. O'Sullivan. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35: 720-725.
11. Cousens, R. and M. Mortimer. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217-242.
12. Dessaint, F. and J. P. Caussanel. 1994. Trend surface analysis: a simple tool for modelling spatial pattern of weeds. Crop Prot. 13:433-438.
13. Dessaint, F., R. Chadoeuf, and G. Barralis. 1991. Spatial pattern analysis of weed seeds in cultivated soil seed bank. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:721-730.
14. Donald, W. W. 1994. Geostatistics for mapping weeds, with a Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) patch as a case study. Weed Sci. 42:648-657.
15. Doyle, C. J. 1991. Mathematical models in weed management. Crop Prot. 10:432-444.
16. Dunning, J. B., B. J. Danielson, and H. R. Pulliam. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169-175.
17. Everitt, J. H., G. L. Anderson, D. E. Escobar, M. R. Davis, N. R. Spencer, and R. J. Andrascik. 1995. Use of remote sensing for detecting and mapping leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Technol. 9:599-609.
18. Firbank, L. G. 1993. Implications of scale on the ecology and management of weeds. In R.G.H. Bunce, L. Ryszkowski, and M. G. Paoletti, eds. Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 91-104.
19. Forcella, F. 1993. Value of managing within-field variability. In P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson, eds. Soil Specific Crop Management. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, pp. 125-132.
20. Forcella, F., R. G. Wilson, K. A. Renner, J. Dekker, R. G. Harvey, D. A. Alm, D. D. Buhler, and J. Cardina. 1992. Weed seedbanks of the U.S. corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 40:636-644.
21. Franz, E., M. R. Gebhardt, and K. B. Unklesbay. 1991. The use of local spectral properties of leaves as an aid for identifying weed seedlings in digital images. Trans. ASAE. 34:682-687.
22. Ghersa, C. M. and M. L. Roush. 1993. Searching for solutions to weed problems: do we study competition or dispersion? BioScience 43:104-109.
23. Gold, H. J., J. Bay, and G. G. Wilkerson. 1996. Scouting for weeds, based on the negative binomial distribution. Weed Sci. 44:504-510.
24. Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. and J. N. Perry. 1995. Models for the herbicidal control of the seed bank of Avena sterile, the effects of spatial and temporal heterogeneity and of dispersal. J. Appl. Ecol. 32:578-587.
25. Haggar, R. J., C. J. Stent, and S. Isaac. 1933. A prototype hand-held patch sprayer for killing weeds, activated by spectral differences in crop/weed canopies. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 28:349-358.
26. Hughes, G. 1996. Incorporating spatial pattern of harmful organisms into crop loss models. Crop Prot. 15:407-421.
27. Hughes, G. 1990. The problem of weed patchiness. Weed Res. 30:223-224.
28. Johnson, G. A. 1994. Model Parameterization, Parametric Sequential Sampling, and Geostatistical Analysis of Weed Seedling Populations. Ph.D. dissertation. Universiry of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. 202 p.
29. Johnson, G. A., D. A. Mortensen, and C. A. Gotway. 1996a. Spatial and temporal analysis of weed seedling populations using geostatistics. Weed Sci. 44:704-710.
30. Johnson, G. A., D. A. Mortensen, and A. R. Martin. 1995a. A simulation of herbicide use based on weed spatial distribution. Weed Res. 35: 197-205.
31. Johnson, G. A., D. A. Mortensen, L. J. Young, and A. R. Martin. 1995b. The stability of weed seedling population models and parameters in eastern Nebraska corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) fields. Weed Sci. 43:604-611.
32. Johnson, G. A., D. A. Mortensen, L. J. Young, and A. R. Martin. 1996b. Parametric sequential sampling based on multistage estimation of the negative binomial parameter k. Weed Sci. 44:555-559.
33. Kareiva, P. 1990. Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lon. B 330:175-190.
34. King, R. P., D. W. Lybecker, E. E. Schweizer, and R. L. Zimdahl. 1986. Bioeconomic modeling to simulate weed control strategies for continuous corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:972-979.
35. Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943-1967.
36. Lloyd, M. L. 1967. Mean crowding. J. Anim. Ecol. 36:1-30.
37. Ludwig, J. A. and J. R. Reynolds. 1988. Spatial pattern analysis. In J. A. Ludwig and J. R. Reynolds. Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. New York: J. Wiley, pp. 13-66.
38. Marra, M. C. and G. A. Carlson. 1983. An economic threshold model for weeds in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:84-92.
39. Marshall, E.J.P. 1988. Field-scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable land. Weed Res. 28:191-198.
40. Marshall, E.J.P. 1989. Distribution patterns of plants associated with arable field edges. J. Appl. Ecol. 26:247-257.
41. Maxwell, B. D. and C. Ghersa. 1992. The influence of weed seed dispersion versus the effect of competition on crop yield. Weed Technol. 6:196-204.
42. Molofsky, J. 1994. Population dynamics and pattern formation in theoretical populations. Ecology 75:30-39.
43. Moloney, K. A. 1988. Fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the demography of a perennial bunchgrass. Ecology 69:1588-1598.
44. Mortensen, D. A. and H. D. Coble. 1991. Two approaches to weed control decision-aid software. Weed Tech. 5:445-452.
45. Mortensen, D. A., G. A. Johnson, and L. J. Young. 1993. Weed distribution in agricultural fields. In P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson, eds. Soil Specific Crop Management. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, pp. 113-123.
46. Navas, M. L. and M. Goulard. 1991. Spatial pattern of a clonal perennial weed, Rubia peregrina (Rubiaceae) in vineyards of southern France. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:1118-1129.
47. Nyrop, J. P. and G. A. Simmons. 1984. Errors incurred when using Iwao's sequential decision rule in insect sampling. Environ. Entomol. 13: 1459-1465.
48. Oliver, L. R. and G. A. Buchanan. 1986. Weed competition and economic thresholds. In N. D. Camper, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society, pp. 71-97.
49. Oriade, C. 1995. A bioeconomic analysis of site-specific management and delayed planting strategies for weed control. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. 150 p.
50. Pacala, S. W. and J. A. Silander. 1987. Neighborhood interference among velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti, and pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus. Oikos 48:217-224.
51. Patterson, D. T. and E. P. Flint. 1983. Comparative water relations, photosynthesis, and growth of soybean (Glycine max) and seven associated weeds. Weed Sci. 31:318-323.
52. Shribbs, J. M., D. W. Lybecker, and E. E. Schweizer. 1990. Bioeconomic weed management models for sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) production. Weed Sci. 38:436-444.
53. Simard, Y., P. Legendre, G. Lavoie, and D. Marcotte. 1992. Mapping, estimating biomass, and optimizing and sampling programs for spatially autocorrelated data: case study of northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49:32-45.
54. Thornton, P. K., R. H. Fawcett, J. B. Dent, and T. J. Perkins. 1990. Spatial weed distribution and economic thresholds for weed control. Crop Prot. 9:337-342.
55. Timmons, F. L. 1970. A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 18:294-307.
56. VanGroenendael, J. M. 1988. Patchy distributions of weeds and some implications for modelling population dynamics: a short literature review. Weed Res. 28:437-441.
57. Vauclin, M., S. R. Vieira, G. Vauchaud, and D. R. Nielsen. 1983. The use of cokriging with limited field soil observations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:175-184.
58. Watson, D. J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Ann. Bot. 11:41-76.
59. Wiles, L. J., G. W. Oliver, A. C. York, H. J. Gold, and G. G. Wilkerson. 1992a. Spatial distribution of broadleaf weeds in North Carolina soybean (Glycine max) fields. Weed Sci. 40:554-557.
60. Wiles, L. J., G. G. Wilkerson, and H. J. Gold. 1992b. Value of information about weed distribution for improving postemergence control decisions. Crop Prot. 11:547-554.
61. Wiles, L. J., G. G. Wilkerson, H. J. Gold, and H. D. Coble. 1992c. Modeling weed distribution for improved postemergence control decisions. Weed Sci. 40:546-553.
62. Williams, L., D. J. Schotzko, and J. P. McCaffrey. 1992. Geostatistical description of the spatial distribution of Limonius californicus wireworms in the northwestern United States, with comments on sampling. Environ. Entomol. 21:983-995.
63. Wilson, B. J. and P. Brain. 1991. Long-term stability of distribution of Alopercurus myosuroides Huds. within cereal fields. Weed Sci. 31:367-373.
64. Woebbecke, D. M., G. E. Meyer, K. Von Bargen, and D. A. Mortensen. 1993. Plant species identification, size, and enumeration using machine vision techniques on near-binary images. In J. A. DeShazer, ed. Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Optics in Agriculture and Forestry. Vol 1836. Boston, MA: SPIE, pp. 208-219.
65. Wyse-Pester, D. and D. A. Mortensen. 1996. The stability in spatial patterns and density of weed populations. WSSA Abstr. 36:44.