Scaling up CBOs for second-order devolution in welfare reform

Nonprofit Management and Leadership

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 325-341

  Poole, Dennis L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13444304075     PISSN: 10486682     EISSN: 15427854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nml.3     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adkisson, R. V., “Welfare Reform: What Are the Numbers, and Does Anyone Care?" Journal of Economic Issues, 2001, 35, 184-200.
2. Albert, V., and King, W. C., “The Impact of the Economy and Welfare Policy on Welfare Accessions: Implications for FutureReforms.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 2001, 28, 5-27.
3. Annie, E., Casey Foundation. Stronger Links: New Steps to Connect Low-Skilled Workers to Better Jobs. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2000.
4. Annie, E., Casey Foundation. Taking the Initiative on Jobs and Race. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2001.
5. Anthony, R. N., and Young, D. W., Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2002.
6. Bielefeld, W., and Scotch, R., “The Decision-Making Context and Its Impact on Local Nonprofit Human ServiceNonprofits.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1998, 9 (1), 53-69.
7. Bischoff, U. M., and Reisch, M. S., “Welfare Reform and Community-Based Organizations: Implications for Policy, Practice, andEducation.” Journal of Community Practice, 2000, 8, 69-91.
8. Bordas, M., “Social Welfare Reform: Comparative Perspectives on Europe and the United States.” International Journal of Public Administration, 2001, 24, 225-234.
9. Brody, R., Effectively Managing Human Service Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1993.
10. Brown, L. D., and Kalegaonkar, A., Addressing Civil Society’s Challenges: Support Organizations as Emerging Institutions. Boston: Institute for Development Research, 1999.
11. Chaves, R., “Religious Congregations and Welfare Reform.” Society, 2000, 38, 21-27.
12. Cnaan, R. A., and Boddie, S. C., “Charitable Choice and Faith-Based Welfare.” Social Work, 2002, 47, 224-235.
13. Conway, S., and Forrester, R., Innovation and Teamworking: Combining Perspectives Through a Focus on Team Boundaries. Birmingham: Aston University, Aston Business School Research Institute, 1999.
14. Damanpour, F., “The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations.” Journal of Management Studies, 2001, 38, 45-65.
15. Danziger, S., Approaching the Limit: Early Lessons from Welfare Reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Poverty Research and Training Center, 2000.
16. Danziger, S., Corcoran, M., Danziger, S., and Heflin, C., “Work, Income, and Material Hardship.” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2000, 34, 6-30.
17. Dickens, R., and Ellwood, D. T., Whither Poverty in Great Britain and the United States: Determinants of Changing Poverty and Whether WorkWill Work. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.
18. Duncan, G., Harris, K., and Boisjoly, J., “Time Limits and Welfare Reform: New Estimates of the Number and Characteristics of AffectedFamilies.” Social Service Review, 2000, 74, 55-75.
19. Farnsley, A. E., “Can Faith-Based Organizations Compete?" Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2001, 30, 99-111.
20. Fetterman, D. M., Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2001.
21. Fredericksen, P., and London, R., “Disconnect in the Hollow State: The Pivotal Role of Organizational Capacity inCommunity-Based Organizations.” Public Administration Review, 2000, 60, 230-239.
22. Glisson, C., “Structure and Technology in Human Service Organizations.” In Y.Hasenfeld (ed.), Human Services as Complex Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1992.
23. Gronbjerg, K. A., “Nonprofit Human Service Organizations: Funding Strategies and Patterns of Adaptation.” In Y.Hasenfeld (ed.), Human Services as Complex Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1992.
24. Gummer, B., “Decision-Making Under Conditions of Risk, Ambiguity, and Uncertainty.” Administration in Social Work, 1998, 2, 75-92.
25. Hall, P. D., Inventing the Nonprofit Sector and Other Essays on Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and NonprofitOrganizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 2002.
26. Huntoon, L., “Government Use of Nonprofit Organizations to Build Social Capital.” Journal of Socio-Economics, 2001, 30, 157-160.
27. Hyden, G., “Building Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium.” In J.Burbridge (ed.), Beyond Prince and Merchant: Citizen Participation and the Rise of Civil Society. New York: PACT, 1997.
28. Ibarra, H., “Structural Alignments, Individual Strategies, and Managerial Action: Elements Toward a Network Theoryof Getting Things Done.” In N.Nohria and R.Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1992.
29. Iversen, R., “TANF Policy Implementation: The Invisible Barrier.“Journal of Social Policy and Social Work, 2000, 27, 139-159.
30. Lens, V., “TANF: What Went Wrong and What to Do Next.” Social Work, 2002, 47, 279-290.
31. Letts, C. W., Ryan, W. P., and Grossman, A., High Performance Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1999.
32. Levesque, M., and White, D., “Social Capital, Human Capital, and Exit from Public Assistance by Long-TermRecipients.” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2001, 26, 167-197.
33. Martin, L. L., “Performance Contracting in the Human Services: An Analysis of Selected StatePractices.” Administration in Social Work, 2000, 24, 29-44.
34. Mills, B. F., Alwang, J. R., and Hazarika, G., “The Impact of Welfare Reform Across Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas.” Paper presented at the Rural Dimensions of Welfare Reform Conference on Poverty, Welfare, and Food Assistance, Washington, D.C., May 2000.
35. Milward, H., Provan, K., and Else, B., “What Does the Hollow State Look Like?" In B.Bozeman (ed.), Public Management: The State of the Part. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1993.
36. Moroney, R., and Kryst, J., Social Policy and Social Work: Critical Essays of the Welfare State. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine de Gruyter, 1998.
37. Nathan, R., and Gais, T., Implementing the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996: A First Look. Albany, N.Y.: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, 1999.
38. Neuman, W. L., Social Research Methods. Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon, 1997.
39. Normann, R., “Organizational Effectiveness: Product Variation and Reorientation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 203-215.
40. Peterson, J., “Welfare Reform and Inequality: The TANF and UI Programs.” Journal of Economic Issues, 2000, 34, 517-526.
41. Poole, D. L., “Achieving National Health Goals in Prevention: The ‘Bottom-Up’Approach.” Journal of Community Practice, 1997, 4, 77-92.
42. Poole, D. L., Ferguson, M. E., DiNitto, D., and Schwab, A. J., “The Capacity of Community-Based Organizations to Lead Local Innovations in Welfare Reform: Early Findings from Texas.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2002, 12 (3) 261-276.
43. Portes, A., “The Two Meanings of Social Capital.” Sociological Forum, 2000, 15, 1-12.
44. Portes, A., and Landolt, P., “The Downside of Social Capital.” American Prospect, 1996, 26, 19-21, 94.
45. Salamon, L. M., Holding the Center: America’s Nonprofit Sector at a Crossroads. New York: Nathan Cummings Foundation, 1997.
46. Schmid, H., “Executive Leadership in Human Service Organizations.” In Y.Hasenfeld (ed.), Human Services as Complex Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1992.
47. Steinhauer, M. B., “Innovation and Change in Organizations: The Absorbing and Sustaining of New Attributes.” In J.Rubin and M. B.Steinhauer (eds.), Handbook on Human Services Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988.
48. Swanson, L. E., “Rural Policy and Direct Local Participation: Democracy, Inclusiveness, Collective Agency, andLocality-Based Policy.” Rural Sociology, 2001, 66, 1-21.
49. Taylor, L. C., “Work Attitudes, Employment Barriers, and Mental Health Symptoms in a Sample of Rural WelfareRecipients.” American Journal of Community Psychology, 2001, 29, 443-463.
50. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Program: Fourth Annual Report to Congress. Washington, D.C.: Administration for Children and Families, 2002.
51. Uvin, P., Jain, P. S., and Brown, L. D., Scaling Up NGO Programs in India: Strengths and Debates. Boston: Institute for Development Research, 2000.
52. Waddell, S., and Brown, L. D., Fostering Intersectoral Partnering: A Guide to Promoting Cooperation Among Government, Business, and CivilSociety Actors. Boston: Institute for Development Research, 1997.
53. Weiss, C. H., Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1997.
54. Wise, L. R., “The Use of Innovative Practices in the Public and Private Sectors: The Role of Organizational andIndividual Factors.” Public Productivity and Management Review, 1999, 23, 150-168.