Welfare reform and community-based organizations: Implications for policy, practice, and education

Journal of Community Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 69-91

  Bischoff, Ursula M ^a   Reisch, Michael S ^b  

^a Children and Family Services Human Services Agency San Mateo County   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Community based organizations; Social work education; Welfare reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992766546     PISSN: 10705422     EISSN: 15433706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J125v08n04_05     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alexander, J., 1999. The Impact of Devolution on Nonprofits:A Multiphase Study of Social Service Organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(1):57–70.
2. Alexander, J., Nank, R., and Stivers, C., 1999. Implications of Welfare Reform:Do Nonprofit Survival Strategies Threaten Civil Society? Nonprofit and Voluntary. Sector Quarterly, 26(4):452–475.
3. Alter, C., and Hage, J., 1993. Organizations working together, Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
4. Besharov, D. J., Germanis, P., and Rossi, P. H., 1997. Evaluating welfare reform:A guide for scholars and practitioners, College Park, MD:University of Maryland.
5. Bloom, D., 1997. After AFDC:Welfare-to-work choices and challenges for states, New York:Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
6. Briggs, R., 1999. Civic, church leaders map plans for welfare changes. The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 8:B1–2.
7. Brown, A., 1997. Work first:How to implement an employment-focused approach to welfare reform, New York:Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
8. City of Philadelphia. June 24 1998. Greater Philadelphia works-proposed plan:Moving from welfare to work, June 24, Philadelphia:Mayor's Office.
9. Cnaan, R., Boddie, S., and Wineburg, R., 1999. The newer deal:Social work and religion in partnership, New York:Columbia University Press.
10. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare. January 1997. Temporary assistance for needy families:State plan, January, Harrisburg, PA:Department of Public Welfare.
11. DeParle, J., 1999. States struggle to use windfall born of shifts in welfare law, New York. New York Times, A1 August 28:A20
12. Edin, K., and Lein, L., 1997. Work, welfare, and single mothers' survival strategies. American sociological review, 62(2):253–266.
13. Hangley, B., 1996. Welfare devolution in greater Philadelphia, Philadelphia:21st Century League.
14. Hassett, S., and Austin, M. J., 1997. Service integration:Something old and something new. Administration in Social Work, 21(3/4):9–29.
15. Johnson, A. K., 1998. The revitalization of community practice:Characteristics, competencies, and curricula for community-based services. Journal of Community Practice, 5(3):37–62.
16. Michigan League for Human Services. 1998. Report on welfare reform in Michigan, Lansing:Michigan League.
17. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. 1997. Summary of Pennsylvania State Plan for the Implementation of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996, Harrisburg:Department of Public Welfare.
18. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. 1998. Statistics on TANF recipients, Harrisburg:Department of Public Welfare.
19. Perlmutter, F., 1997. From welfare to work:Corporate initiatives and welfare reform, New York:Oxford University Press.
20. Philadelphia Citizens for Children and Youth. 1998. Watching out for children's lives:The impact of welfare reform on Philadelphia's children, Philadelphia:Philadelphia Citizens for Children and Youth.
21. Philadelphia Citizens for Children and Youth. 1999. Watching out for children in changing times:TANF and children's well-being, Philadelphia:Philadelphia Citizens for Children and Youth.
22. Raffel, J., 1998. TANF Act 35 and Pennsylvania's new welfare system, Philadelphia:21st Century League.
23. Reisch, M., and Jarman-Rohde, L., “Strengthening Community Advocacy Through Collaborative Cultural Activities and Political Action,”. annual conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action. Seattle, WA. November.
24. Reitan, T., 1998. Theories of interorganizational relations in the human services. Social Service Review, 72(3):285–309.
25. Roberts-DeGenarro, M., 1997. Conceptual framework of coalitions in an organizational context. Journal of Community Practice, 4(1):91–107.
26. Salamon, L., 1995. Partners in public service, Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Wilson, W. J., 1997. When work disappears:The world of the new urban poor New York