Intelligence, memory and malingering: Correlation between scales;Inteligencia, memoria y simulación: Correlaciones entre instrumentos de medida

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 28-33

  Ramirez R M ^a   Chirivella Garrido, J ^a   Caballero, M C ^a   Ferri Campos, J ^a   Noé Sebastián, Enrique ^a  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Intelligence; Malingering; Test of memory malingering; Wechsler adult intelligence III

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOSTON NAMING TEST; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPLUTENSE VERBAL LEARNING TEST; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; INTELLIGENCE TEST; LEARNING TEST; MALE; MALINGERING; MEMORY DISORDER; PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; SCORING SYSTEM; TEST OF MEMORY MALINGERING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 1342321667     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.3801.2003533     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4 ed. Text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington DC: APA; 2000.
2. Trueblood W, Schmidt M. Malingering and other validity considerations in the neuropsychological evaluation of mild head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1993; 15: 578-90.
3. Franzen MD, Iverson GL, McCracken LM. The detection of malingering in neuropsychological assessment. Neuropsychol Rev 1990; 1: 247-79.
4. Muñoz-Céspedes JM, Paul-Laprediza N. La detección de las posibles causas de simulación después de un traumatismo craneoencefálico. Rev Neurol 2001; 32: 773-8.
5. Binder LM, Rohling ML. Money matters: a meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed-head injury. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 7-10.
6. Ethical clinical practice of functional brain imaging. Society of Nuclear Medicine Brain Imaging Council. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 1256-9.
7. Assessment of brain SPECT. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1996; 46: 278-85.
8. Tardif HP, Barry RJ, Johnstone SJ. Event-related potentials reveal processing differences in honest vs malingered memory performance. Int J Psychophysiol 2002; 46: 147-58.
9. Ellwanger J, Tenhula WN, Rosenfeld JP, Sweet JJ. Identifying simulators of cognitive deficit through combined use of neuropsychological test performance and event-related potentials. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999; 21: 866-79.
10. Ferrero-Arias J. Evaluación del deterioro cognitivo y simulación. Primer Congreso Virtual Iberoamericano de Neurología; 1998. URL: http://cvneuro.org/. Fecha última consulta: 15.12.2003.
11. Slick DJ, Iverson GL, Green P. California verbal learning test indicators of suboptimal performance in a sample of head-injury litigants. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2000; 22: 569-79.
12. Sweet JJ, Wolfe P. Further investigation of traumatic brain injury versus insufficient effort with the California verbal learning test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2000; 15: 105-13.
13. Millis SR, Ross SR, Ricker JH. Detection of incomplete effort on the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised: a cross-validation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998; 20: 167-73.
14. Mittenberg W, Theroux S, Aguila-Puentes G, Bianchini K, Greve K, Rayls K. Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler adult intelligence scale. 3 ed. Clin Neuropsychol 2001; 15: 440-5.
15. Colby F. Using the binomial distribution to assess effort: forced-choice testing in neuropsychological settings. Neurorehabilitation 2001; 16: 311-12.
16. Hiscock M, Hiscock CK. Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989; 11: 967-74.
17. Rees L, Tombaugh T. Five validation experiments of the tests of memory malingering (TOMM). Psychol Assessment 1988; 10: 10-20.
18. Tombaugh T. The test of memory malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychol Assessment 1997; 9: 260-8.
19. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 1974; 2: 81-4.
20. Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston orientation and amnesia test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis 1979; 167: 675-84.
21. Wardlaw JM, Easton VJ, Statham P. Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 188-92.
22. Wechsler D. Escala de inteligencia para adultos-III. Madrid: TEA; 1999.
23. Benedet MA. Test de aprendizaje verbal complutense. Madrid: TEA; 1999.
24. Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1987.
25. Buriel Y, Rodés E, Böhm P, Peña-Casanova J. Fluencia verbal y no verbal: estudio normativo piloto en una muestra española de adultos jóvenes (20-49 años) [abstract). Neurología 2002; 17: 557.
26. García-Albea J, Sánchez-Bernardos ML, Del Viso S. Test de Boston para el diagnóstico de la afasia: adaptación española. Madrid: Panamericana; 1998.