Setting up a discipline, II: British history of science and "the end of ideology", 1931-1948

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 41-72

  Mayer, Anna K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bernal; Butterfield; Cambridge; Cold War; Hessen; Needham; Pagel

Indexed keywords

EID: 1342310759     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (182)

1. e Congrès International d'Histoire des Sciences, Lausanne, 30 septembre-6 octobre 1947. Paris: Académie Internationale d'Histoire des Sciences, 1948.
2. e Congrès International d'Histoire des Sciences, Amsterdam, 14-21 août 1950, 2 vols. Paris: Académie Internationale d'Histoire des Sciences, 1953.
3. Armytage W.G.H. The first director-general of UNESCO In Keynes M. & Ainsworth Harrison G. (Eds.), Evolutionary studies: A centenary celebration of the life of Julian Huxley 1989 186-193 Macmillan London
4. Barnes B. Shapin S. Head and hand: Rhetorical resources in British pedagogical writing, 1770-1850 Oxford Review of Education 2 1976 231-254
5. Bennett J.A. Museums and the establishment of the history of science at Oxford and Cambridge British Journal for the History of Science 30 1997 29-46
6. Bensaude-Vincent B. A founder myth in the history of sciences? The Lavoiser case In Graham W.L. Lepenies W. & Weingart P. (Eds.), Functions and uses of disciplinary histories 1983 53-78 Reidel Dordrecht, Boston, & Lancaster
7. Bernal J.D. (1931). Science and society. The Spectator, 11 July, 43-44. (Reprinted in J. D. Bernal, The freedom of necessity (pp. 334-339). London: Routledge - Kegan Paul, 1949)
8. Bernal J.D. 1936 The history of science. Review of A. Wolf, A history of science, technology, and medicine in the 16th and 17th centuries. London: Allen & Unwin, 1935. The Scientific Worker, 9, 62-65.
9. Bernal J.D. 1946 Letter to M. Polanyi, 30 January. Bernal Papers, Cambridge University Library.
10. Blue G. Scientific humanism and the founding of UNESCO Comparative Criticism 23 2001 173-200
11. Borkenau F. Der Übergang vom feudalen zum bürgerlichen Weltbild 1934 Felix Alcan Paris
12. Bowker G. Latour B. A booming discipline short of discipline: (Social) studies of science in France Social Studies of Science 17 1987 715-748
13. Brush S. Should the history of science by rated "X"? Science 183 1974 116-472
14. Bryder L. Papworth Village Settlement: A unique experiment in the treatment and care of the tuberculous? Medical History 28 1984 372-390
15. Budden K.G. John Ashworth Ratcliffe Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 34 1988 669-711
16. Butler F.H.C. Charles Earle Raven, 1885-1964 British Journal for the History of Science 2 1964-1965 254-256
17. Butterfield H. History and the Marxian method Scrutiny 1 1933 339-355
18. Butterfield H. (1948a). A bridge between the arts and sciences. The Listener, 15 July, 94-95.
19. Butterfield H. (1948b). Letter to J. Needham, 10 November. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B309.
20. Butterfield H. The origins of modern science 1949a Bell London
21. Butterfield H. (1949b). Article intended as editorial for Endeavour, sent 13 October. Butterfield Papers, Cambridge University Library, BUTT/290/1.
22. Butterfield H. The historian and the history of science Bulletin of the British Society for the History of Science 1 1950 49-58
23. Butterfield H. (1951b). Marxist history. In idem, History and human relations (pp. 66-100). London: Collins.
24. Butterfield H. History in the twentieth century The Historical Association 1906-1956 1955 66-78 G. Philip London
25. Butterfield H. (1959a). Untitled typescript for the first Horblit Lecture on the History of Science, delivered 24 March at Harvard. Butterfield Papers, Cambridge University Library, BUTT/347/6.
26. Butterfield H. The history of science and the study of history Harvard Library Bulletin 13 1959 329-347
27. Butterfield H. (1969). Letter to J. Hope Franklin, 14 July. Butterfield Papers, Cambridge University Library, BUTT/H124.
28. Butterfield H. (1972). The discontinuities between the generations in history: Their effect on the transmission of political experience. Rede Lecture, 1971. Cambridge: University Press, 1972.
29. Ceruti M. Il materialismo dialettico e la scienza negli anni 1930 In Hobsbawm E.J. Haupt G. Marek F. Ragioneri E. Strada V. & Vivanti C. (Eds.), Storia del Marxismo 4 vols 3 1981 493-550 Einaudi Turin
30. Christie J.R.R. (1990). The development of the historiography of science. In idem, R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, & M. J. S. Hodges (Eds.), Companion to the history of modern science (pp. 4-22). London & New York: Routledge.
31. Clark G.N. The seventeenth century 1929 Clarendon Oxford
32. Clark G.N. The sciences as an integral part of general historical study Archeion 14 1932 272-273
33. Clark G.N. Social and economic aspects of science in the age of Newton Economic History 3 1937a 362-379
34. Clark G.N. Science and social welfare in the age of Newton 1937b Oxford University Press Oxford
35. Cowling M. Herbert Butterfield, 1900-1979 Proceedings of the British Academy 65 1979 594-609
36. Crombie A.C. (Ed.), Scientific change: Historical studies in the intellectual, social and technical conditions for scientific discovery and technical invention, from Antiquity to the present 1963 Heinemann London
37. Cunningham V. (1994). Paper presented at the international conference on 'Cold War culture', University College, London, 22 October.
38. Cunningham A. Williams P. De-centring the "big picture": The origins of modern science and the modern origins of science British Journal for the History of Science 26 1993 407-432
39. Dampier W. A history of science 1929 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
40. Dampier W. The sciences as an integral part of general historical study Archeion 14 1932 273-274
41. Dampier W. From Aristotle to Galileo In Needham J. & Pagel W. (Eds), Background to modern science 1938 25-46 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
42. Debus A.G. Science, medicine and society in the Renaissance: Essays to honour Walter Pagel (2 vols) 1972 Heinemann London
43. Debus A.G. The history of science today Technologia [Belgium] 9 1986 133-146
44. Dennis M.A. Historiography of science: An American perspective In Krige J. & Pestre D. (Eds.), Science in the twentieth century 1997 1-26 Harwood Amsterdam
45. Dickinson H.W. (1931). Letter to Joseph Needham, 19 September. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, H136.
46. Dijksterhuis. E. J. (1950). Review of H. Butterfield, The origins of modern science. London: G. Bell & Sons Ltd., 1949. Centaurus, 1, 177-179.
47. Dingle H. Comments Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 99 1955 348-349
48. Dingle H. History of science and the sociology of science Scientific Monthly 82 March 1956 107-111
49. Forman P. Independence, not transcendence, for the historian of science Isis 82 1991 71-86
50. Foster S.G. Varghese M. The making of the Australian National University, 1946-96 1996 Allen & Unwin St. Leonard, Australia
51. Graham L.R. Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A short history 1993 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
52. Hall A.R. (1949). Ballistics in the 17th century: A study of the relations of science and war, with reference principally to England. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
53. Hall A.R. (1952). History of Science Committee. Report on activities, 1936-1952. Whipple Museum Papers, Whipple Museum for the History of Science, C63.
54. Hall A.R. Merton revisited or science and society in the seventeenth century History of Science 2 1963 1-16
55. Hall, A. R. (1968). Can the history of science be history? British Journal for the History of Science, 4. (1968-1969), 207-220.
56. Hall A.R. On the historical singularity of the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century In Elliott J.H. & Koenigsberger H.G. (Eds.), The diversity of history: Essays in honour of Sir Herbert Butterfield 1970 199-221 Routledge & Kegan Paul London
57. Hall A.R. On Whiggism History of Science 21 1983 45-58
58. Hall A.R. Beginnings in Cambridge Isis 75 1984 22-25
59. Haraway D.J. Crystals, fabrics, and fields: Metaphors of organicism in twentieth-century developmental biology 1976 Yale University Press New Haven, CT
60. Hesse M. (1962). History and philosophy of science in the early Natural Sciences Tripos. Cambridge Review, 24 November, 140-145.
61. Hessen B. (1931). The social and economic roots of Newton's 'Principia'. In Science at the cross roads: Papers presented to the International Congress of the History of Science and Technology (pp. 147-212). London: Kniga.
62. Hill C. Dell E. (Eds.). (1949). The good old cause: The English Revolution of 1640-1660, its cause and consequences: Extracts from contemporary sources. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
63. Hobsbawm E. Preface In Swann B. & Aprahamian F. (Eds.), J. D. Bernal: A life in politics 1999 ix-xx Verso London & New York
64. Iliffe R. Theory, experiment and society in French and Anglo-Saxon history of science European Review of History-Revue Européenne d'Histoire 2 1995 65-77
65. Jardine N. The mantle of Müller and the ghost of Goethe: Interactions between the sciences and their histories In Kelley D.R. (Ed.), History and the disciplines: The reclassification of knowledge in early modern Europe 1997 297-317 University of Rochester Press Rochester
66. Joravsky D. Soviet views on the history of science Isis 46 1955 3-13
67. Joravsky D. Soviet Marxism and natural science, 1917-1932 1961 Routledge & Kegan Paul London
68. Koyré A. (1939). Études galiléennes. Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, 852-854. Paris: Hermann & Cie.
69. Koyré A. Galileo and the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century The Philosophical Review 52 1943a 333-348
70. Koyré A. Galileo and Plato Journal of the History of Ideas 4 1943b 400-428
71. Koyré, A. (1948a). Les philosophes et la machine. Review of P.-M. Schuhl, Machinisme et philosophie (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1946. Critique, 4, 324-333, 610-629.
72. Koyré A. The significance of the Newtonian synthesis [paper presented at the University of Chicago, 3 November] Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences 29 1950 1948b 291-311
73. Koyré A. Review of H. Dingle, The scientific adventure. London: Pitman, 1952 Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences 33 1954 349-351
74. Lasch, C. (1970). The cultural cold war: A short history of the Congress for Cultural Freedom. In idem, The agony of the American Left (pp. 61-114). London: Andre Deutsch.
75. Laudan L. Comment In Stuewer R.H. (Ed.), Historical and philosophical perspectives of science 1970 127-132 University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis
76. Lawrence, C. (1998). Still incommunicable: Clinical holists and medical knowledge in interwar Britain. In idem, - G. Weisz (Eds.), Greater than the parts: Holism in biomedicine 1920-1950 (pp. 3-22). New York - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Lawrence C. A tale of two sciences: Bedside and bench in twentieth-century Britain Medical History 43 1999 421-449
78. Levy, H. (1933). Isaac Newton. The Listener, 8 February, 197-199.
79. Lilley, S. (1947). Report to the Commission for the History of the Social Relations of Science. Dated 26 June. Bernal Papers, Cambridge University Library.
80. Lindsay, J. O. (Ed.) (1950). The early history of science: A short handlist. Helps for Students of History, 52. London: G. Philip.
81. Lindsay J.O. (Ed.), The history of science: Origins and results of the scientific revolution: A symposium 1951 Scientific Book Club London
82. Lu G.-D. The first half-life of Joseph Needham In Explorations in the history of science and technology in China: Compiled in honour of the eightieth birthday of Dr. Joseph Needham, FRS, FBA 1982 1-38 Shanghai Chinese Classics Publishing House Shanghai
83. MacLeod C. Concepts of invention and the patent controversy in Victorian Britain In Fox R. (Ed.), Technological change: Methods and themes in the history of technology 1996 137-153 Harwood Academic Publishers Amsterdam
84. Marvin, F. S. (1931a). The significance of the seventeenth century. Review of G. N. Clark, The seventeenth century. Oxford: Clarendon, 1929. Nature, 7 February, 191-192.
85. Marvin, F. S. (1931b). Soviet science. Review of Science at the cross roads. London: Kniga. Nature, 1 August, 170-171.
86. Mason, S. F. (1997). Manuscript of his account for Personal Records of Fellows of the Royal Society, received 6 January 1998.
87. Mason, S. F. (1998). Interview for the BSHS oral history project, 'The history of science in Britain, 1945-65', 6 January (Cambridge).
88. Mayer A.-K. Setting up a discipline: Conflicting agendas of the Cambridge History of Science Committee, 1936-1950 Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31 2000 665-689
89. Mayer A.-K. Fatal mutilations: Educationism and the British background to the 1931 International Congress for the History of Science and Technology History of Science 40 2002 445-472
90. Mayer, A.-K. (2003a). Roots of the history of science in Britain, 1916-1950. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
91. Mayer, A.-K. (2003b). Singer, Pollard and the neglect of science: The Two Cultures at University College, London. Paper presented in the Research Seminar of the Department of Science and Technology Studies, University College, London, on 19 May.
92. McEvoy J. Positivism, Whiggism, and the chemical revolution: A study in the historiography of chemistry History of Science 35 1997 1-33
93. McEvoy J. Perspectives on Priestley's science Enlightenment and Dissent 19 2000 60-77
94. McEvoy J. Postpositivist interpretations of the chemical revolution Canadian Journal of History 36 2001 453-469
95. McGucken W. Scientists, society, and state: The Social Relations of Science Movement in Great Britain 1931-1947 1984 Ohio State University Press Columbus
96. McGuire J.E. Rattansi P.M. Newton and the "pipes of Pan" Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 21 1966 108-143
97. McKie D. Antoine Lavoisier, the father of modern chemistry 1935 Victor Gollancz London
98. McKie, D. (1939). Review of G. N. Clark, Science and social welfare in the age of Newton. Oxford: University Press, 1937. Annals of Science, 4, 108.
99. McKie, D. (1945). Letter to F. S. Taylor, 23 [February]. Papers, Museum for the History of Science, Oxford.
100. McKie, D. (1947a). Letter to F. S. Taylor, 18 April. Papers, Museum for the History of Science, Oxford.
101. McKie, D. (1947b). Letter to F. S. Taylor, 23 April. Papers, Museum for the History of Science, Oxford.
102. McKie D. The history and philosophy of science Universities Quarterly 6 1951-1952 169-174
103. McKie, D. (1961). Letter to D. Waley Singer, 4 February. Singer Papers, Wellcome Institute Library, London, ref. PP/CJS/A.12.1-.
104. Memorandum (1944). Memorandum on the future of the history of science as a subject of study and research in the University with proposals for the creation of a University museum and University department. Typescript, Whipple Museum Papers, Whipple Museum for the History of Science, Cambridge, C43.
105. Memorandum (1946). Memorandum on the teaching of the history of science in Universities (pp. 91-92). Oxford: General Board of Faculties [May].
106. Mendelsohn, E. (1999). Science at a crossroads: Defining and prescribing an uncertain future. Paper presented in the session on 'The history of the discipline, c. 1930-1950', at the 75th Annual Meeting of the History of Science Society in Pittsburgh, 3-7 November.
107. Merton, R. K. (1938). Review of G. N. Clark, Science and social welfare in the age of Newton. Oxford: University Press, 1937. Isis, 29, 119-121.
108. Metzger, H. (1933). Review of J. H. White, The history of the phlogiston theory. London: Edward Arnold, 1932. Archeion, 15, 113-115.
109. Metzger, H. (1935). Review of D. McKie, Antoine Lavoisier, the father of modern chemistry. London: Victor Gollancz, 1935. Archeion, 17, 464-466.
110. Mieli, A. (1935). Review of A. Wolf, A history of science, technology, and medicine in the 16th and 17th centuries. London: Allen - Unwin, 1935. Archeion, 17, 275-282.
111. Montalenti, G. (1932). Review of J. Needham, Chemical embryology (3 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1931. Archeion, 14, 152-154.
112. Needham, J. (1925). Mechanistic biology and the religious consciousness. In idem (Ed.), Science, religion and reality (pp. 219-257). London - Cambridge: The Sheldon Press.
113. Needham, J. (1928). Letter to Roberts [at Cambridge University Press], 12 May. Cambridge University Press Archive, Cambridge University Library, Pr.C/N.25-7.
114. Needham J. Chemical embryology (3 vols) 1931 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
115. Needham J. A history of embryology 1934 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
116. Needham, J. (1936). Letter to Roberts [at Cambridge University Press], 7 September. Cambridge University Press Archive, Cambridge University Library, Pr.C/N.25-7.
117. Needham, J. (1938). Review of R. K. Merton, Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England (Osiris, 4, 1938). Science and Society, 2 (1937-1938), 566-571.
118. Needham J. UNESCO and the history of science Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences 1 1947 3-4
119. Needham, J. (1948a). Notes on the meeting of the History of Science Committee on 3 June. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B309.
120. Needham, J. (1948b). Letter to C. Singer, 7 June. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B309.
121. Needham, J. (1948c). Letter to C. Singer, 21 June. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B309.
122. Needham, J. (1949). Letter to J. O. Lindsay, 14 November. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B310.
123. Needham, J. (under the pseudonym Holorenshaw, H.) (1973). The making of an honorary Taoist. InM. Teich, - R. Young (Eds.), Changing perspectives in the history of science: Essays in honour of Joseph Needham (pp. 1-20). London: Heinemann.
124. Needham J. Pagel W. Background to modern science: Ten lectures at Cambridge arranged by the History of Science Committee 1938 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
125. Olschki L. Galilei und seine Zeit 1927 Max Niemeyer Halle
126. Pagel W. J. B. van Helmont. Einführung in die philosophische Medizin des Barock 1930 J. Springer Berlin
127. Pagel W. Helmont-Leibniz-Stahl Sudhoffs Archiv der Geschichte der Medizin (und Naturwissenschaften) 24 1931 19-59
128. Pagel W. Virchow und die Grundlagen der Medizin des XIX. Jahrhunderts 1931 G. Fischer Jena
129. Pagel, W. (1935). Religious motives in seventeenth-century medical biology. Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine, 3, 97-128, 213-231, 265-312.
130. Pagel W. The vindication of "rubbish" Middlesex Hospital Journal Autumn 1945 42-45
131. Pagel W. Erinnerungen und Forschungen In Mauel K. (Ed.), Wege zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte II 1982 45-66 Steiner Wiesbaden
132. Pelseneer J. L'origine protestante de la science moderne Lychnos 10 1946-1947 246-248
133. Pelseneer J. Les influences dans l'histoire des sciences Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences 1 1948 347-353
134. Pelseneer, J. (1948b). Science pure et science appliquée, à la lumière de l'histoire des science. Society for Freedom in Science, Occasional Pamphlet, 7. (First published in Alumni, 16 (1947))
135. Pelseneer J. Peut-on planifier la recherche scientifique? Ce que nous dit l'histoire des mathématiques Isis 46 1955 95-98
136. Pelseneer J. Putman J. L'histoire des sciences, l'université et les influences Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences 30 1951 1950 879-883
137. e Congrès International d'Histoire des Sciences, Amsterdam, 14-21 août 1950 (2 vols.) (Vol. 1, pp. 398-402). Paris: Académie Internationale d'Histoire des Sciences, 1953.
138. Polanyi, M. (1946). Letter to J. D. Bernal, 8 January. Bernal Papers, Cambridge University Library.
139. Porter R. The history of science and the history of society In Olby R.C. Cantor G.N. Christie J.R.R. Hodge M.J.S. (Eds.), Companion to the history of modern science 1990 32-46 Routledge London - New York
140. Putman, J. (1951). Review of B. Farrington, Has history a meaning? London: South Place Ethical Society, 1950. In Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, 30, 175-178.
141. Putman, J. (1954). Review of S. Lilley (Ed.), Essays on the social history of science. Centaurus, 3. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard, 1953. Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, 33, 195-197.
142. Pyenson L. Inventory as a route to understanding: Sarton, Neugebauer, and sources History of Science 33 1995 253-282
143. Ratcliffe, J. A. (1946). Second memorandum on the revision of the Natural Science Tripos. Dated 4 November. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B308.
144. Rattansi P.M. Some evaluations of reason in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century natural philosophy In Teich M. Young R. (Eds.), Changing perspectives in the history of science: Essays in honour of Joseph Needham 1973 148-166 Heinemann London
145. Raven C. John Ray, naturalist: His life and works 1942 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
146. Raven, C. (1950). Letter to H. Butterfield, 13 February. Butterfield Papers, Cambridge University Library, BUTT/107/6.
147. Rée, J. (1984). Dialectical materialism and the scientists. In idem, Proletarian philosophers: Problems in socialist culture in Britain, 1900-1940 (pp. 79-105). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
148. Report (1947). Report on the activities of the History of Science Lectures Committee 1936-1947. Whipple Museum Papers, Whipple Museum for the History of Science, Cambridge, C62.
149. Report (1950). Report of the Committee of Management for the History and Philosophy of Science, 16 October. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B313.
150. e Congrès International d'Histoire des Sciences, Amsterdam, 14-21 août 1950 (2 vols.) (Vol. 1, pp. 384-392). Paris: Académie Internationale d'Histoire des Sciences, 1953.
151. Roberts E.A. The Anglo-Marxists: A study in ideology and culture 1997 Rowman - Littlefield Publishers, Inc Lanham, New York, Boulder, - Oxford
152. Rooseboom, M. (1950a). Letter to A. R. Hall, 4 September. Whipple Museum Papers, Whipple Museum for the History of Science, D33.
153. Rooseboom, M. (1950b). Letter to A. R. Hall, 25 September. Whipple Museum Papers, Whipple Museum for the History of Science, D34.
154. Sarton, G. (1935-1936). Review of A. Wolf, A history of science, technology, and medicine in the 16th and 17th centuries. London: Allen - Unwin, 1935. Isis, 24, 164-167.
155. Sarton G. The history of science and the new humanism 1962 Indiana University Press Bloomington
156. Schaffer S. Newton at the crossroads Radical Philosophy 37 1984 23-28
157. Schmitt C.B. Recent trends in the study of medieval and Renaissance science In Corsi P. Weindling P. (Eds.), Information sources in the history of science and medicine 1983 221-240 Butterworth Scientific London
158. Secord A. Science in the pub: Artisan botanists in early nineteenth-century Lancashire History of Science 32 1994 269-315
159. Shapin S. Schaffer S. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life 1985 Princeton University Press Princeton
160. Singer, C. (1931). Statement. Observer, 5 July, 13.
161. Singer, C. (1948). Letter to J. Needham, 20 June. Needham Papers, Cambridge University Library, B309.
162. Singer, C. (1957). Letter to E. A. Appleton, 21 November. Singer Papers, Wellcome Institute Library, London, ref. PP/CJS/A.47.
163. Taylor, F. S. (1945). Is the progress of science controlled by the material wants of man? Society for Freedom in Science, Occasional Pamphlet, 1.
164. Taylor, F. S. (1955). Review of C. Singer, E. J. Holmyard, - A. R. Hall (Eds.), A history of technology, Vol. 1, From early times to fall of ancient empires, c. 500 B. C. London: Oxford University Press, 1954. Discovery, 16, 86.
165. Thackray, A. (1970). Science: Has its present past a future? In R. H. Stuewer (Ed.), Historical and philosophical perspectives of science (pp. 112-127, 132-133). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
166. Thackray A. History of science In Durbin P.T. (Ed.), A guide to the culture of science, technology and medicine 1980 3-69 Free Press New York
167. Thackray A. Merton R.K. On discipline building: The paradoxes of George Sarton Isis 63 1972 473-495
168. Toulmin S. From form to function: Philosophy and history of science in the 1950s and now Daedalus 106 Summer 1977 143-162
169. Toulmin S. Cosmopolis. The hidden agenda of modernity 1990 Free Press New York
170. Webster C. (Ed.), The intellectual revolution of the seventeenth century 1974 Routledge - Kegan Paul London
171. Webster C. The great instauration: Science, medicine and reform, 1626-1660 1975 Duckworth London
172. Webster, C. (1998). Interview for the BSHS oral history project, 'The history of science in Britain, 1945-65', 18 March (Oxford).
173. Weindling P. Medical refugees and the renaissance of medical history in Great Britain, 1930s-60s In Bröer R. (Ed.), Eine Wissenschaft emanzipiert sich. Die Medizinhistoriographie von derAufklärung bis zur Postmoderne 1999 139-147 Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft Pfaffenweiler
174. Werskey G. The visible college: A collective biography of British scientists and socialists of the 1930s 1978 Allen Lane London
175. Werskey, P. G. (1971). On the reception of science at the cross roads in England. In Science at the cross roads: Papers presented to the International Congress of the History of Science and Technology (2nd ed.) (pp. xi-xxix). London: Frank Cass - Co.
176. Williams P. Passing on the torch: Whewell's philosophy and the principles of English university education In Fisch M. Schaffer S. (Eds.), William Whewell: A composite portrait 1991 117-147 Clarendon Press Oxford
177. Winder, M. (1985). Preface. In W. Pagel, Religion and neoplatonism in Renaissance medicine (pp. vii-ix). London: Variorum Reprints.
178. Winsor M.P. Cain on Linnaeus: The scientist-historian as unanalysed entity Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32C 2001 239-254
179. Wolf A. A history of science, technology, and medicine in the 16th and 17th centuries (with the cooperation of F. Dannemann, - A. Armitage) 1935 Allen - Unwin London
180. Wood A. Joule and the study of energy 1925 Bell London
181. Wood N. Communism and British intellectuals 1959 Columbia University Press New York
182. Zilsel E. The sociological roots of science American Journal of Sociology 47 1942 544-562