Role of intrinsic muscle properties in producing smooth movements

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 165-176

  Krylow, Andrew M ^a,c   Zev Rymer, W ^b  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Veterans Administration Lakeside   (United States)

Author keywords

Hill's model; minimum jerk; muscle modeling; muscle properties; smoothness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; LIMB MOVEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR COORDINATION; MUSCLE CONTRACTION;

ANIMALS; CATS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 0031025215     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/10.552246     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. B. C. Abbott and D. R. Wilkie, The relation between velocity of shortening and the tension-length curve of skeletal muscle, J. Physiol., vol. 120, pp. 214-223, 1953.
2. W. Abend, E. Bizzi, and P. Morasso, Human arm trajectory formation, Brain, vol. 105, pp. 331-348, 1982.
3. E. Bizzi, N. Accornero, W. Chappie, and N. Hogan, Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement, J. Neurosci., vol. 4. no. 11, pp. 2738-2744, 1984.
4. M. Dornay and T. D. Sanger, Equilibrium point control of a monkey simulator by a fast learning tree structured artificial neural network, Biol. Cybern., vol. 68, pp. 499-508, 1993.
5. S. Edelman and T. Flash, A model of handwriting, Biol. Cybern., vol. 57, pp. 25-36, 1987.
6. T. Flash, The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements, Biol. Cybern., vol. 57, pp. 257-274, 1987.
7. The optimization of human arm trajectory control, in Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization, J. M. Winters and S. L.-Y. Woo, Eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
8. T. Flash and N. Hogan, The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model, J. Neurosci., vol. 5, pp. 1688-1703, 1985.
9. L. E. Ford, A. F. Huxley, and R. M. Simmons, The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres, J. Physiol., vol. 311, pp. 219-249, 1981.
10. A. V. Hill, The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle, Proc. Roy. Soc., vol. B126, pp. 136-195, 1938.
11. A. Hreljac, The relationship between smoothness and performance during the practice of a lower limb obstacle avoidance task, Biol. Cybern., vol. 68, pp. 375-379, 1993.
12. B. Hoff and M. A. Arbib, A model of the effects of speed, accuracy, and perturbation on visually guided reaching, in Control of Arm Movement in Space: Neurophysiological and Computational Approaches, R. Caminiti, P. B. Johnson, and Y. Burnod, Eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp. 285-306.
13. D. S. Huffman and P. L. Strick, Step-tracking movements of the wrist in humans. I. Kinematic analysis, J. Neurosci., vol. 6, pp. 3309-3318, 1986.
14. N. Hogan, An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements, J. Neurosci, vol. 4, pp. 2745-2754, 1984.
15. N. Hogan and T. Flash, Moving gracefully: Quantitative theories of motor coordination, TINS, vol. 10, pp. 170-174, 1987.
16. J. M. Hollerbach and T. Flash, Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement, Biol. Cybern., vol. 44, pp. 67-77, 1982.
17. J. C. Houk and W. Z. Rymer, Neural control of muscle length and tension, in Handbook of Physiology, sec. 1: The Nervous System, vol. II: Motor Control, pt. 1, V. B. Brooks, Ed. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1981.
18. J. C. Houk, W. Z. Rymer, and P. E. Crago, Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity, J. Neurophys., vol. 46, pp. 143-166, 1981.
19. A. F. Huxley, Muscle structure and theories of contraction, Progress in Biophysics, vol. 7, pp. 255-318, 1957.
20. F. J. Julian and M. R. Sollins, Variation of muscle stiffness with force at increasing speeds of shortening, J. Gen. Physiol., vol. 66, pp. 287-302, 1975.
21. A. M. Krylow and W. Z. Rymer Role of intrinsic muscle properties in producing movement smoothness, in Proc. Int. Soc. Biomech., XlVth Congress, Paris, July 1993, pp. 720-721.
22. A. M. Krylow and T. G. Sandercock, Dynamic force responses of muscle involving eccentric contraction, J. Biomech., 1996 (in press).
23. A. Mannard and R. B. Stein, Determination of the frequency response of isometric soleus muscle in the cat using random nerve stimulation, J. Physiol., vol. 229, pp. 275-296, 1973.
24. H. Mashima, K. Akazawa, H. Kushima, and K. Fujii, The force-loadvelocity relation and the viscous-like force in the frog skeletal muscle, Jpn. J. Physiol., vol. 22, pp. 103-120, 1972.
25. P. Morasso, Spatial control of arm movements, Exp. Brain Res., vol. 42, pp. 223-227, 1981.
26. L. D. Partridge, Signal-handling characteristics of load moving skeletal muscle, Amer. J. Physiol., vol. 210, pp. 1178-1191, 1966.
27. Intrinsic feedback factors producing inertial compensation in muscle, Biophysical J., vol. 7, pp. 853-863, 1967.
28. K. Schneider and R. F. Zernicke, Jerk-cost modulations during the practice of rapid arm movements, Biol. Cybern., vol. 60, pp. 221-230, 1989.
29. R. B. Stein, F. W. J. Cody, and C. Capaday, The trajectory of human wrist movements, J. Neurophys., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1814-1830, 1988.
30. R. B. Stein, M. N. Oguztöreli, and C. Capaday, What is optimized in muscular movements? in Human Muscle Power, N. L. Jones, N. McCartney, and A. J. McComas, Eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1986.
31. Y. Uno, M. Kawato, and R. Suzuki, Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement, Biol. Cybern., vol. 61, pp. 89-101, 1989.
32. G. I. Zahalak, A comparison of the mechanical behavior of the cat soleus muscle with a distribution-moment model, Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 108, pp. 131-140, 1986.