Hydrogen bonding between histidine and lignin model compounds or redox mediators as calculated with the DFT method. Effects on the ease of oxidation

Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 578-584

  Reynisson, Jóhannes ^a,b   Steenken, Steen ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL ENERGY CONVERSION   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; CHLORINE; COMPLEXATION; DEGRADATION; DISSOCIATION; ENZYMES; HYDROGEN BONDS; LIGNIN; OXIDATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; REDOX REACTIONS;

HISTIDINE; HYDROGEN BONDING;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

HISTIDINE; ION; LIGNIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DIMERIZATION; HYDROGEN BOND; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION;

DIMERIZATION; HISTIDINE; HYDROGEN BONDING; IONS; LIGNIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OXIDATION-REDUCTION;

EID: 1342287593     PISSN: 14770520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b314991a     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. K. V. Sarkanen and C. H. Ludwig, Lignins: Occurrence, Formation, Structure, and Reactions, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971.
2. H. E. Schoemaker, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1990, 109, 255.
3. G. Labat and B. Meunier, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1990, 127, 553.
4. V. Ducros, A. M. Brzozowski, K. S. Wilson, P. Østergaard, P. Schneider, A. Svendson and G. J. Davies, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr., 2001, 57, 333.
5. D. W. Randall, S. D. George, P. L. Holland, B. Hedman, K. O. Hodgson, W. B. Tolman and E. I. Solomon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 11632.
6. P. L. Holland and W. B. Tolman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 6331.
7. V. Ducros, A. M. Brzozowski, K. S. Wilson, S. H. Brown, P. Østergaard, P. Schneider, D. S. Yaver, A. H. Pedersen and G. J. Davies, Nat. Struct. Biol., 1998, 5, 310.
8. M. Antorini, T. Choinowski, J. Sigoillot, M. Asther, K. Winterhalter, K. Piontek and I. Herpoel-Gimbert, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2002, 1594, 109.
9. K. Piontek, M. Antorini and T. Choinowski, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 40, 37663.
10. K. Piontek, T. Glumoff and K. Winterhalter, FEBS, 1993, 315, 119.
11. T. L. Poulos, S. L. Edwards, H. Wariishi and M. H. Gold, J. Biol. Chem., 1993, 268, 4429.
12. T. Choinowski, W. Blodig, K. H. Winterhalter and K. Piontek, J. Mol. Biol., 1999, 286, 809.
13. W. Blodig, A. T. Smith, W. A. Doyle and K. Piontek, J. Mol. Chem., 2001, 305, 851.
14. The electron density in hydrogen atoms is low and therefore they give a poor X-ray signal. Hence, hydrogen bond bridges can only be postulated based on crystallographic data.
15. F. Xu, J. J. Kulys, K. Duke, K. Li, K. Krikstopaitis, H. J. Deussen, E. Abbate, V. Galinyte and P. Schneider, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2000, 5, 2052.
16. K. Li, F. Xu and K. L. Eriksson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1999, 6, 2654.
17. P. Baiocco, A. M. Barreca, M. Fabbrini, C. Galli and P. Gentili, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 191.
18. F. d'Acunzo, P. Baiocco, M. Fabbrini and C. Galli, New J. Chem., 2002, 26, 1791.
19. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. A. M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle and J. A. Pople, Gaussian 98 Rev. A9, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
20. C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B., 1988, 37, 785.
21. A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A., 1988, 38, 3098.
22. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 5648.
23. P. C. Hariharan and J. A. Pople, Theor. Chim. Acta, 1973, 28, 213.
24. M. W. Wong, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1996, 256, 391.
25. S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Mol. Phys., 1970, 19, 553.
26. F. B. v. Duijneveldt, J. G. C. M. v. D. v. d. Rijdt and J. H. v. Lenthe, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 1873.
27. V. Shafirovich, A. Dourandin and N. E. Geacintov, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 8431.
28. From this point 2AP is regarded as a redox mediator in the text.
29. J. B. Foresman and &Aelig;. Frisch, Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1996, pp. 142.
30. -1 instead of eV.
31. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/.
32. T. Bally and G. N. Sastry, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1997, 101, 7923.
33. K. Bernhard, J. Geimer, M. Canel-Lopez, J. Reynisson, D. Beckert, R. Gleiter and S. Steenken, Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 7, 4640.
34. J. Reynisson and S. Steenken, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 527.
35. This has been shown to be the case for purine-pyrimidine base pairs. See ref. 36-38.
36. A. O. Colson, B. Besler and M. D. Sevilla, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 9787.
37. J. Reynisson and S. Steenken, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 5346.
38. J. Reynisson and S. Steenken, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 5353.
39. M. Bietti, E. Baciocchi and S. Steenken, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 7337.
40. P. J. Kersten, B. Kalyanaraman, K. E. Hammel, B. Reinhammar and T. K. Kirk, Biochem. J., 1990, 268, 475.
41. 42 oxidation potential of 1,2-dimethoxybenzene of 1.44 V/NHE.
42. M. Jonsson, J. Lind, T. Reitberger, T. E. Eriksen and G. Merenyi, J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 11278.
43. S. Miertus, E. Scrocco and J. Tomasi, Chem. Phys., 1981, 55, 117.
44. S. Miertus and J. Tomasi, Chem. Phys., 1982, 65, 239.
45. -1 for the radical cation.
46. D. Grand, A. Bernas and E. Amouyal, Chem. Phys., 1979, 44, 73.
47. M. Braun, J. Y. Fan, W. Fuss, K. L. Kompa, G. Müller and W. E. Schmid, UV Laser Ionization Spectroscopy and Ion Photochemistry, ed. Z. Prior, A. Ben-Reuven, and M. Rosenbluh, Plenum Press, New York, London, 1986, pp. 367.
48. During discussions in meetings and conferences we have found other researchers encountered a similar experience.
49. R. Car and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1985, 55, 2471.
50. As a consequence of the increase in bond strength, the H-bond distances between the BA-derivatives and IM are decreased by 0.12-0.27 Å upon oxidation. For example in veratryl alcohol the H-bond length is 1.90 Å in the parent pair but only 1.63 Å in the oxidized species. In comparison, in the O-H covalent bond lengths in the BA-derivatives, the removal of an electron from the pairs results, however, in only small changes (∼0.05 Å).
51. 2O are comparable to ammonia.
52. M. Mohr, D. Marx, M. Parinello and H. Zipse, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 4009.
53. M. Mohr and H. Zipse, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001, 3, 1246.
54. J. Lind, X. Shen, T. E. Eriksen and G. Merenyi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 479.
55. 56
56. D. F. McMillen and D. M. Golden, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1982, 33, 493.
57. Y. V. Novakovskaya and N. F. Stepanov, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103, 3285.
58. M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys., 1984, 80, 3265.
59. Here, the Counterpoise method cannot be applied because one needs two separate entities in order to get the H-bond energy.
60. -1.
61. F. d'Acunzo, P. Baiocco, M. Fabbrini, C. Galli and P. Gentili, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 24, 4195.
62. F. d'Acunzo and C. Galli, Eur. J. Biochem., 2003, 270, 3634.
63. G. Cantarella, C. Galli and P. Gentili, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2003, 22, 135.
64. J. A. Kerr, Chem. Rev., 1966, 66, 465.
65. C. Møller and M. S. Plesset, Phys. Rev., 1934, 46, 618.
66. B. R. Singh and R. Ghosh, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1981, 43, 727.
67. J. M. Moratal, A. Prades, M. Julve and J. Faus, Thermochim. Acta, 1985, 89, 343.
68. S. Steenken, S. V. Jovanovic, L. P. Candeias and J. Reynisson, Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 7, 2829.
69. S. D. Wetmore, R. J. Boyd and L. A. Eriksson, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102, 7674.
70. K. W. Egger and A. T. Cocks, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1973, 56, 1516.