Teachable Agents Learning by Teaching Environments for Science Domains

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 109-116

  Leelawong, Krittaya ^a   Viswanath, Karun ^a   Davis, Joan ^a   Biswas, Gautam ^a   Vye, Nancy ^a   Belynne, Kadira ^a   Bransford, John ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

AGENT LEARNING; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; COMPUTER-BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; EDUCATION RESEARCH; LEARNING BY TEACHING; SCIENCE EDUCATION; SCIENCE RESEARCH; TEACHABLE AGENTS; TEACHING PARADIGM;

TEACHING;

EID: 13244295173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Ponder, G.K., Kelly, J., Evolution, chaos, or perpet-ual motion? A prospective trend analysis of secon-dary science curriculum advocacy, 1955-1994. Jour- nal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1997. 12(3): pp. 238-245.
2. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. How People Learn. expanded ed. 2000, National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.
3. Wenger, E., Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Sys-tems. 1987, Los Altos, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
4. Lajoie, S.P. and S.J. Derry, Computer Environments as Cognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning, in Com-puter as Cognitive Tools, S.P. Lajoie and S.J. Derry, Editors. 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hills-dale, NJ.
5. Crews, T.R., et al., Adventureplayer: A microworld anchored in a macrocontext, Intl. Jour. of AI in Educ., vol. 8, pp. 142-178, 1997.
6. Burton, R.B., Brown, J. S., An investigation of com-puter coaching for informal learning activities. Intel-ligent tutoring systems, London: Academic Press, 1982: p. 79-98.
7. Bargh, J.A. and Y. Schul, On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980. 72(5): p. 593-604.
8. Graesser, A.C., N. Person, and J. Magliano, Collabo-rative dialog patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutor-ing. Applied Cognitive Psychologist, 1995. 9: p. 359-387.
9. Chi, M.T.H., et al., Learning from Human Tutoring. Cognitive Science, 2001. 25(4): p. 471-533.
10. Biswas, G., et al., Technology Support for Complex Problem Solving: From SAD Environments to AI, in Smart Machines in Education, Forbus and Feltovich, Editors. 2001, AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA. p. 71-98.
11. Smith, D.C., Cypher, A., & Spohrer, J, Programming Agents without a Programming Language, in J. M Bradshaw (Ed.) Software Agents. 1997, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press. p. 165-190.
12. Ball, G., Ling, D., Kurlander, D., Miller, J., Pugh, D., Skelly, T., Stankosky, A., Theil, D., Van Dantzich, M., & Wax, T., Lifelike computer characters: The persona project at Microsoft research, in J. M. Brad-shaw (Ed.), Software Agents. 1997, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press. p. 191-222.
13. Huffman, S.B. and J.E. Laird, Flexibly Instructable Agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1995. 3: p. 271-324.
14. Palthepu, S., J.E. Greer, and G.I. McCalla. Learning by teaching. in The International Conference on Learning Sciences. 1991. Illinois, USA.
15. Lieberman, H., and Maulsby, D., Instructible agents: Software that just keeps getting better. IBM Systems Journal, 35, 3/4., 1996.
16. Michie, D., A. Paterson, and J. Hayes-Michie. Learn-ing by Teaching. in Second Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) 1989. 1989. Tam-pere, Finland: IOS Press.
17. Quinlan, J.R., Induction of decision trees. Machine Leanring, 1986. 1(1): p. 81-106.
18. Obayashi, F., H. Shimoda, and H. Yoshikawa. Con-struction and Evaluation of CAI System Based on 'Learning by Teaching to Virtual Student'. in World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and In-formatics. 2000. Orlando, Florida.
19. Chan, T.-W. and C.-Y. Chou, Exploring the Design of Computer Supports for Reciprocal Tutoring. Inter-national Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Educa-tion, 1997. 8: p. 1-29.
20. Novak, J.D., Concept Mapping as a tool for improv-ing science teaching and learning, in Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics, D.F. Treagust, R. Duit, and B.J. Fraser, Editors. 1996, Teachers College Press: London. p. 32-43.
21. Kinchin, I.M. and D.B. Hay, How a qualitative ap-proach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual devel-opment. Educational Research, 2000. 42(1): p. 43-57.
22. Stoyanov, S. and P. Kommers, Agent-Support for Problem Solving Through Concept-Mapping. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 1999. 10(3/4): p. 401-42.
23. Reeves, B. and Nass C., The Media Equation: How people treat computers, televisons and new media like real people and places. 1996: Cambridge Univer-sity Press, Cambridge.
24. Leelawong, K., et al. The Effects of Feedback in Supporting Learning by Teaching in a Teachable Agent Environment. in The Fifth International Con-ference of the Learning Sciences. 2002. Seattle, Washington.
25. Forbus, K., Qualitative Process Theory, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, pp. 85-168, 1984.
26. Davis, J.M., et al. Intelligent User Interface Design for Teachable Agent Systems. in International Con-ference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 2003. Miami, Florida: The Association for Computing Machinery.
27. Repenning, A., & Sumner, T. (1995). Agentsheets: A medium for creating domain oriented visual lan-guages. Computer, 28, 17-25.