Interpretation of leftward-moved constituents: Processing topicalizations in German

Linguistics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 49-87

  Bader, Markus ^a   Frazier, Lyn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13244292415     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2005.43.1.49     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Aoun, Joseph; and Li, Audrey Yen-hui (1993). Syntax of Scope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bader, Markus; Meng, Michael; Bayer, Josef; and Hopf, Jens-Max (2000). Syntaktische Funktions-Ambiguitäten im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 19, 34-102.
3. Bierwisch, Manfred (1983). How on-line is language processing? In The Process of Language Understanding, Giovanni B. Flores d'Arcais and Robert J. Jarvella (eds.), 113-168. New York: Wiley.
4. Carlson, Greg N. (1977). A unified analysis of the English bare plurals. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413-457.
5. Chierchia, Gennaro (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339-405.
6. Fanselow, Gisbert; and Cavar, Damir (2001). Distributed deletion. In Theoretical Approaches to Universals, A. Alexiadou (ed.), 65-97. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
7. Fodor, Janet Dean (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 4, 155-209.
8. Frazier, Lyn (2002). Syntax-semantics interface: LF and beyond. CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
9. _; and Clifton, Charles Jr. (2002). Processing d-linked phrases. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31, 633-659.
10. _; Plunkett, Bernadette; and Clifton, Charles Jr. (1996). Reconstruction and scope. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 19, 239-260.
11. Frey, Werner (1990). Syntaktische Bedingungen für die Interpretation. Über Bindung, implizite Argumente und Skopus. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 Nr. 1. Universität Stuttgart.
12. Gibson, Edward (1998). Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 1-76.
13. Hemforth, Barbara; and Konieczny, Lars (eds.) (2000). German Sentence Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Heim, Irene (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
15. Ioup, Georgette (1975). Some universals for quantifier scope. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 4, John Kimball (ed.), 37-58. New York: Academic Press.
16. Kamp, Hans (1984). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Truth, Interpretation and Information, Jeroen A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Jansen, and Martin B. J. Stokhof (eds.), 1-41. Dordrecht: Foris.
17. _; and Reyle, Uwe (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Language and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Lidz, Jeffrey (1999). The morphosemantics of object cases in Kannada. In The Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics, Sonya Bird et al. (eds.), 325-336. Cambridge: Cascadilla Press.
19. _; and Musolino, Julien (2002). Children's command of quantification. Cognition 84, 113-154.
20. Longobardi, Guiseppe (2001). How comparative is semantics? A unified parametric theory of bare nouns and proper names. Natural Language Semantics 9, 335-360.
21. Murphy, Gregory L. (1984). Establishing and accessing referents in discourse. Memory and Cognition 12, 489-497.
22. Pafel, Jürgen (1995). Kinds of extraction from noun phrases. In On Extraction and Extra-position in German, Uli Lutz and Jürgen Pafel (eds.), 145-177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. _(1997). Skopus und logische Struktur. Studien zum Quantorenskopus im Deutschen. Unpublished postdoctoral thesis, University of Tübingen.
24. Pesetsky, David (1987). Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (In)definites, Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), 98-129, Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. Sekerina, Irina (1997). The syntax and processing of scrambling constructions in Russian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
26. Tunstall, Susanne (1998). The interpretation of quantifiers: semantics and processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
27. van Riemsdijk, Henk (1989). Movement and regeneration. In Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Paola Benincà (ed.), 105-136. Dordrecht: Foris.
28. Villalta, Elisabeth (1999). The role of context in the resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Paper presented at the CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing, 1999.
29. von Fintel, Kai (1994). Restrictions on quantifier domains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
30. von Stechow, Arnim (1996). The different readings of wieder 'again': a structural account. Journal of Semantics 13, 87-138.
31. Warren, Tessa; and Gibson, Edward (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition 85, 79-112.