Reuse-based layering: A strategy for architectural frameworks for learning technologies

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 455-459

  Paris, Maeve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; INFORMATION MODELS; LEARNING TECHNOLOGY; REUSE-BASED LAYERING;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); INTEROPERABILITY; STANDARDS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 13244270034     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357456     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Wilson, S., "The next big thing? Three architectural frameworks for learning technologies", CETIS, 2001a.
2. Eeles, P., 2001, "Layering Strategies", The Rational Edge, October 2001.
3. Collins-Cope, M., & Matthews, H., 2000, "A Reference Architecture for Component Based Development", OOIS 2000, pp. 225-237.
4. Polsani, P.R., "Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects", Journal of Digital Information, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2003.
5. Soley, R., "Model-driven architecture targets middleware interoperability challenges", IBM DeveloperWorks, 17 June 2003.
6. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. New York, 1990.
7. IEEE 1484.12.1-2002, Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata, Learning Technology Standards Committee, IEEE, 2002.
8. LTSC, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, 2001.
9. Wiley, D.A., "Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor and a taxonomy". In Wiley, D.A. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Bloomington, 2000.
10. MASIE Center e-Leaming Consortium, Making Sense of Learning Specifications and Standards: a Decision Maker's Guide to their Adoption, the MASIE Center, 2002.
11. Cisco Systems, Reusable Learning Object Strategy v.4.0, Cisco Systems Inc, 2001.
12. Jacobsen, P., "Reusable Learning Objects - What does the Future Hold?", E-Leaming Magazine, November 1, 2001.
13. Douglas, I., "Instructional Design Based on Reusable Learning Objects: Applying Lessons of Object-oriented Software Engineering to Learning Systems Design", in Proceedings of 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10-13, 2001.
14. Jacobson, I., Griss, M., Johnsson, P, Software Reuse -Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success, Addison-Wesley Longman, 1997.
15. Anido-Rifon, L.E., Santos-Gago, J.M., Rodriguez-Estevez, J.S., Caeiro-Rodriguez, M., Fernandez-Iglesias, M.J., Llamas-Nistal, M., "A Step Ahead in E-leaming Standardization: Building Learning Systems from Reusable and Interoperable Software Components", WWW2002, 2002.
16. Wilson, S., "Common Behaviour: IMS and OKI consider architecture issues", CETIS, 2001b.
17. Kraan, W., "OKI, IMS, ADL and SIF join up", CETIS, 2002
18. Zimmermann, H., "OSI Reference Model - The ISO Model of Architecture for Open Systems Interconnection," IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-28, No. 4: April 1980.
19. Petersen, J., "Benefits of using the n-tiered approach for web applications", ColdFusion Development Centre, 2003.