Inter-residue distances derived from fold contact propensities correlate with evolutionary substitution costs

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 5, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Williams, Gareth ^a   Doherty, Patrick ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS; FOLDING PROPENSITIES; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; SPATIAL ARRANGEMENTS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE; STRUCTURE PREDICTION; SUBSTITUTION RATES; WEALTH OF INFORMATION;

AMINO ACIDS; PROTEIN FOLDING;

PROTEINS;

AMINO ACID; CYSTEINE; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PREDICTION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE DATABASE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO ACIDS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 13244259265     PISSN: 14712105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-153     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL: Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasichemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985, 18: 34-552.
2. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL: Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996, 256: 23-644.
3. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL: An empirical energy potential with a reference state for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 1999, 36(3):357-369.
4. Jernigan RL, Bahar I: Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996, 6: 95-209.
5. Li H, Tang C, Wingreen NS: Nature of Driving Force for Protein Folding: A Result From Analyzing the Statistical Potential. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 79:765-768.
6. Wang J, Wang W: Grouping of residues based on their contact interactions. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2002, 65(4 Pt 1):041911.
7. Grzybowski BA, Ishchenko AV, Kim CY, Topalov G, Chapman R, Christianson DW, Whitesides GM, Shakhnovich EI: Combinatorial computational method gives new picomolar ligands for a known enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002, 99:1270-1273.
8. Dayhoff MO, Schwartz RM, Orcutt BC: A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure Edited by: Dayhoff MO. Washington, DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation;; 1978:345-352.
9. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG: Amino Acid Substitution Matrices from Protein Blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1992, 89: 0915-10919.
10. Hobohm U, Sander C: Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994, 3:522-524.
11. Zvelebil MJ, Barton GJ, Taylor WR, Sternberg MJ: Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J Mol Biol 1987, 195: 57-961.
12. Kyte J, Doolittle RF: A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982, 157: 05-132.
13. Zamyatnin AA: Protein volume in solution. Prog Biopsy Mol Boil 1972, 24:107-123.
14. Cornette JL, Cease KB, Margalit H, Spouge JL, Berzofsky JA, DeLisi C: Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. J Mol Biol 1987, 195:659-685.
15. Wertz DH, Scheraga HA: Influence of water on protein structure. An analysis of the preferences of amino acid residues for the inside or outside and for specific conformations in a protein molecule. Macromolecules 1978, 11:9-15.
16. Murray KB, Gorse D, Thornton JM: Wavelet transforms for the characterization and detection of repeating motifs. J Mol Biol 2002, 316:341-363.
17. Kim J, Moriyama EN, Warr CG, Clyne PJ, Carlson JR: Identification of novel multi-transmembrane proteins from genomic databases using quasi-periodic structural properties. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:767-775.