Characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome as r(8) at prenatal diagnosis by MFISH

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 73-78

  Gole, L A ^a   Biswas, A ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Chromosome 8; Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (MFISH); Prenatal diagnosis; Supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; C BANDING; CASE REPORT; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME 8; CHROMOSOME G BAND; CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE; LYMPHOCYTE; MARKER CHROMOSOME; MENTAL DEVELOPMENT; MULTICOLOR FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERNUMERARY CHROMOSOME;

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNIOTIC FLUID; ANEUPLOIDY; CHROMOSOME BANDING; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 8; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MALE; MOSAICISM; PREGNANCY; RING CHROMOSOMES; SPECTRAL KARYOTYPING;

POMACANTHUS MACULOSUS;

EID: 13244255702     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1087     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amiel A, Fejgin M, Appelman Z, et al. 1995. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) as an aid to marker chromosome identification in prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 59(1): 103-107.
2. Blennow E, Anneren G, Bui TH, Beggren E, Asadi E, Nordenskjo LDM. 1993. Characterization of supernumerary ring marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet 53: 433-442.
3. Brondum-Nielsen K, Mikkelsen MA. 1995. 10-year survey, 1980-1990, of prenatally diagnosed small supernumerary marker chromosomes, identified by FISH analysis. Outcome and follow-up of 14 cases diagnosed in a series of 12,699 prenatal samples. Prenat Diagn 15(7): 615-619.
4. Butler MG, Roback EW, Allen GA, Dev VG. 1995. Identification of a ring chromosome as a ring 8 using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a child with multiple congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet 57: 494-495.
5. Crolla JA. 1998. FISH and molecular studies of autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes excluding those derived from chromosome 15: II. Review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 75: 367-381.
6. Crolla JA, Dennis NR, Jacobs PA. 1992. A non-isotopic in situ hybridisation study of the chromosomal origin of 15 supernumerary marker chromosomes in man. J Med Genet 29(10): 699-703.
7. Daniel A, Malafiej P. 2003. A series of supernumerary small ring marker autosomes identified by FISH with chromosome probe arrays and literature review excluding chromosome 15. Am J Med Genet 117A: 212-222.
8. Daniel A, Malafiej P, Preece K, Chia N, Nelson J, Smith M. 1994. Identification of marker chromosomes in thirteen patients using FISH probing. Am J Med Genet 53: 8-18.
9. Ferguson-Smith MA, Yates JR. 1984. Maternal age specific rates for chromosome aberrations and factors influencing them: report of a collaborative european study on 52 965 amniocenteses. Prenat Diagn 4 Spec No: 5-44.
10. Fisher AM, Cockwell AE, Moore KJ, et al. 1996. Rapid in situ harvesting and cytogenetic analysis of perinatal tissue samples. Prenat Diagn 16: 615-621.
11. Gravholt CH, Friedrich U. 1995. Molecular cytogenetic study of supernumerary marker chromosomes in an unselected group of children. Am J Med Genet 56: 106-111.
12. Hastings RJ, Nisbet DL, Waters K, Spencer T, Chitty LS. 1999. Prenatal detection of extra structurally abnormal chromosomes (ESACs): new cases and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 19: 436-445.
13. Herry A, Morel F, Le Bris MJ, et al. 2004. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two small chromosome 8 derived supernumerary mosaic markers. Am J Med Genet 128A(1): 33-38.
14. Li MM, Howard-Peebles PN, Killos LD, Fallon L, Listgarten E, Stanley WS. 2000. Characterization and clinical implications of marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 20(2): 138-143.
15. Melnyk AR, Dewald G. 1994. Identification of a small supernumerary ring chromosome 8 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in a child with developmental delay and minor anomalities. Am J Med Genet 50: 12-14.
16. Ohashi H, Wakui K, Ogawa K, Okano T, Niikawa N, Fukushima Y. 1994. A stable acentric marker chromosome: possible existence of an intercalary ancient centromere at distal 8p. Am J Hum Genet 55: 1202-1208.
17. Plattner R, Heerma NA, Howard-Peebles PN, Miles JH, Soukup S, Palmer CG. 1993. Clinical findings in patients with marker chromosomes identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 91: 589-598.
18. Rooney DE, Czepulkowski BH. 1997. Human Chromosome Preparation: Essential Techniques Edited by Chichester. Wiley: New York.
19. Rothenmund H, Chudley AE, Dawson AJ. 1997. Familial transmission of a small supernumerary marker chromosome 8 identified by FISH: an update. Am J Med Genet 72(3): 339-342.
20. Sachs ES, Van Hemel JO, Den Hollander JC, Jahoda MG. 1987. Marker chromosomes in a series of 10,000 prenatal diagnoses. Cytogenetic and follow-up studies. Prenat Diagn 7(2): 81-89.
21. Sasagawa I, Nakada T, Ishigooka M, Tomaru M, Sawamura T, Tateno T. 1995. Cryptorchidism and marker chromosomes: identification of marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Urol Int 55: 25-28.
22. Schrock E, Veldman T, Padilla-Nash H, et al. 1997. Spectral karyotyping refines cytogenetic diagnostics of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Genet 101: 255-262.
23. Senger G, Chudoba I, Plesch A. 1998. Multicolor-FISH-the identification of chromosome aberrations by 24 colors. Bioforum 9: 499-503.
24. Spinner NB, Grace KR, Owens NL, et al. 1995. Mosaicism for a chromosome 8-derived minute marker chromosome in a patient with manifestations of trisomy 8 mosaicism. Am J Med Genet 56: 22-24.
25. Starke H, Nietzel A, Weise A, et al. 2003. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs): genotype-phenotype correlation and classification. Hum Genet 114(1): 51-67.
26. Starke H, Schreyer I, Kahler C, et al. 1999. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a prenatally detected supernumerary minute marker chromosome 8. Prenat Diagn 19(12): 1169-1174.
27. Thilaganathan B, Sairam S, Ballard T, Peterson C, Meredith R. 2000. Effectiveness of prenatal chromosomal analysis using multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107(2): 262-266.
28. Uhrig S, Schuffenhauer S, Fauth C, et al 1999. Multiplex-FISH for pre- and postnatal diagnostic applications. Am J Hum Genet 65(2): 448-462.
29. Warburton D. 1991. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Med Genet 49: 995-1013.