Social versus genetic measures of reproductive success in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1167-1181

  Mehranvar, Ladan ^a   Healey, Michael ^a   Farrell, Anthony ^b   Hinch, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consort; Dominance; Genetic mating success; Life span; Partners; Social mating success; Sockeye salmon

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS NERKA;

EID: 13144277636     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abell, A.J. 1997. Estimating paternity with spatial behaviour and DNA fingerprinting in the striped plateau lizard, Sceloporus virgatus (Phrynosomatidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 41: 217-226.
2. Altmann, J., Alberts, S. and Haines, S.A. 1996. Behaviour predicts genetic structure in a wild primate group. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 5797-5801.
3. Amos, W., Twiss, S., Pomeroy, P.P. and Anderson, S.S. 1993. Male mating success and paternity in the grey seal, Halichoerus grypus: a study using DNA fingerprinting. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 252: 199-207.
4. Avise, J.C. 1994. Molecular Markers. Natural History and Evolution. London: Chapman & Hall.
5. Barlaup, B.T., Lura, H., Saegrov, H. and Sundt, R.C. 1994. Inter- and intra-specific variability in female salmonid spawning behaviour. Can. J. Zool., 72: 636-642.
6. Berglund, A., Bisazza, A. and Pilastro, A. 1996. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 58: 385-399.
7. Brett, J.R. 1995. Energetics. In Physiological Ecology of Pacific Salmon (C. Groot, L. Margolis and W. Clarke, eds.), pp. 1-68. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
8. Chebanov, N.A., Varnavskaya, N.V. and Varnevskii, V.S. 1983. Effectiveness of spawning of male sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Salmonidae), of differing hierarchical rank by means of genetic-biochemical markers. J. Ichthyol., 23: 51-55 (English translation).
9. Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1988. Reproductive Success - Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Coltman, D.W., Bancroft, D.R., Robertson, A. et al. 1999. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates with genetic paternity. Mol. Ecol., 8: 1199-1209.
11. Cox, C.R. and Leboeuf, B.J. 1977. Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. Am. Nat., 111: 317-335.
12. Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
13. Fleming, I.A. 1996. Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: ecology and evolution. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher., 6: 379-416.
14. Foote, C.J. 1988. Male mate choice dependent on male size in salmon. Behaviour, 106: 63-80.
15. Foote, C.J. 1989. Female mate preference in Pacific salmon. Anim. Behav., 38: 721-723.
16. Foote, C.J., Brown, G.S. and Wood, C.C. 1997. Spawning success of males using alternative mating tactics in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54: 1785-1795.
17. Garant, D., Dodson, J.J. and Bernatchez, L. 2001. A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J. Hered., 92: 137-145.
18. Gross, M.L. and Kapuscinski, A.R. 1997. Reproductive success of smallmouth bass estimated and evaluated from family-specific DNA fingerprints. Ecology, 78: 1424-1430.
19. Gullberg, A., Olsson, M. and Tegelstrom, H. 1997. Male mating success, reproductive success and multiple paternity in a natural population of sand lizards: behavioural and molecular genetics data. Mol. Ecol., 6: 105-112.
20. Hamon, T.R., Foote, C.J. and Brown, G.S. 1999. Use of female nest characteristics in the sexual behaviour of male sockeye salmon. J. Fish Biol., 55: 459-471.
21. Hanson, A.J. and Smith, H.D. 1967. Mate selection in a population of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) of mixed age group. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 24: 1955-1977.
22. Healey, M. and Prince, A. 1998. Alternative tactics in the breeding behaviour of male coho salmon. Behaviour, 135: 1099-1124.
23. Healey, M., Lake, R. and Hinch, S. 2003. Energy expenditures during reproduction by sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Behaviour, 140: 161-182.
24. Hendry, A.P., Berg, O.K. and Quinn, T.P. 2001. Breeding location choice in salmon: causes (habitat, competition, body size, energy stores) and consequences (life span, energy stores). Oikos, 93: 407-418.
25. Hughes, C. 1998. Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behaviour: a revolution results. Ecology, 19: 383-399.
26. Krebs, J.R. and Davies, N.B. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
27. Lebas, N. 2001. Microsatellite determination of male reproductive success in a natural population of the territorial ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Mol. Ecol., 10: 193-203.
28. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. and Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence or likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol., 7: 639-655.
29. Middendorf, L.R., Bruce, J.C., Bruce, R.C. et al. 1992. Continuous, on-line DNA sequencing using a versatile infrared laser scanner/electrophoresis apparatus. Electrophoresis, 13: 487-494.
30. Neff, B. 2001. Genetic paternity analysis and breeding success in Bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). J. Hered., 92: 111-119.
31. Oetting, W., Lee, H., Flanders, D. et al. 1995. Linkage analysis with multiplexed short tandem repeat polymorphisms using infrared fluorescence and M13 stalked primers. Genomics, 30: 450-458.
32. Pemberton, J.M., Albon, S.D., Guinness, F.E., Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Dover, G.A. 1992. Behavioural estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behav. Ecol., 3: 66-75.
33. Quinn, T.P. and Foote, C.J. 1994. The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behaviour of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Anim. Behar., 48: 751-761.
34. Reynolds, J.D. 1996. Animal breeding systems. TREE, 11: 68-72.
35. Schroder, S. 1982. The influence of intrasexual competition on the distribution of chum salmon in an experimental stream. In Proceedings of the Salmon and Trout Migratory Symposium (E.L. Brannon and E.O. Salo. eds.), pp. 275-285. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
36. Taggart, J., McLaren, I., Hay, D., Webb, J. and Youngson, A. 2001. Spawning success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): a long-term DNA profiling-based study conducted in a natural stream. Mol. Ecol., 10: 1047-1060.