Editorial: Opportunities for cross-cultural comparative research on leisure

Leisure Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 79-91

  Chick, Garry ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropology; Cross Cultural Research; Culture; Games; Leisure; Recreation

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL INFLUENCE; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY;

EID: 12944311031     PISSN: 01490400     EISSN: 15210588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014904000272867     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allison, M. T., Schneider, I. E., & Valentine, K. (2000). Response to comments by Drs. GordonWalker and Karen Fox. Leisure Sciences, 22, 65–67.
2. Bialeschki, M. D., & Walbert, K. L. (1998). “You have to have some fun to go along with your work”: The interplay of race, class, gender, and leisure in the industrial new South. Journal of Leisure Research, 30, 79–100.
3. Burton, M. L., Moore, C. C., Whiting, J. W. M., & Romney, A. K. (1996). Regions based on social structure. Current Anthropology, 37, 87–123.
4. Campbell, D. T. (1961). The mutual methodological relevance of anthropology and psychology. In F. L. K. Hsu (Ed.), Psychological anthropology: Approaches to culture and personality (pp. 333– 352). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
5. Chick, G. (1984). The cross-cultural study of games. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 12, 307–337.
6. Chick, G. (1993). Leisure and the evolution of culture: Cross-cultural tests of several hypotheses. In G. Cushman, P. Jonson, & T. Veal (Eds.), Leisure and tourism: Social and environmental change (pp. 293–300). Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Centre for Leisure and Tourism Studies, University of Technology.
7. Chick, G. (1995). The adaptive qualities of leisure: A cross-cultural survey. In C. Simpson & B. Gidlow (Eds.), Proceedings of the ANZALS Conference, 1995 (pp. 158–163). Canterbury, New Zealand: Australian and New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies.
8. Chick, G. (1997). Cultural complexity: The concept and its measurement. Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 275–307.
9. Chick, G. (1998a). Games in culture revisited: A replication and extension of Roberts, Arth, and Bush (1959). Cross-Cultural Research, 32, 185–206.
10. Chick, G. (1998b). Leisure and culture: Issues for an anthropology of leisure. Leisure Sciences, 32, 1–15.
11. Chick, G. (1999). Leisure’s anthropology and the anthropology of leisure: The coverage of anthropology in leisure texts and leisure in anthropology texts. Schole, 14, 19–35.
12. Chick, G., Loy, J. W., & Miracle, A. W. (1997). Combative sport and warfare: A reappraisal of the spillover and catharsis hypotheses. Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 249–267.
13. Duda, J. L., & Allison, M. T. (1990). Cross-cultural analysis in exercise and sport psychology: A void in the. eld. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 114–131.
14. Ember, C. R. & Ember, M. (1998). Cross-cultural research. In H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 647–687). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
15. Ember, M. (1997). Evolution of the Human Relations Area Files. Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 3–15.
16. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1965). The comparative method in social anthropology. In E. E. Evans-Pritchard (Ed.), The position of women in primitive society and other essays in social anthropology (pp. 1–22). New York: Free Press.
17. Florian, V., & Har-Even, D. (1984). Cultural patterns in the choice of leisure time activity frameworks: A study of Jewish and Arab youth in Israel. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 330–337.
18. Floyd, M. F., & Shinew, K. J. (1999). Convergence and divergence in leisure style among Whites and African Americans: Toward an interracial contact hypothesis. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 359–384.
19. Floyd, M. R., Shinew, K. J., McGuire, F. A., & Noe, F. P. (1994). Race, class, and leisure activity preferences: Marginality and ethnicity revisited. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 158–173.
20. Fox, K. M. (2000). Response to “The one-way mirror.” Leisure Sciences, 22, xxx–xxx.
21. Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Gibbons, J. L., Lynn, M., & Stiles, D. A. (1997). Cross-national gender differences in adolescents’ preferences for free-time activities. Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 55–69.
23. Goodenough, W. H. (1996). Murdock as bridge: From Sumner to HRAF to SCCR. Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 275–280.
24. Hobhouse, L. T. (1906). Morals in evolution. New York: Holt.
25. Hobhouse, L. T., Wheeler, G. C., & Ginsberg, M. (1915). The material culture and social institutions of the simpler peoples. London: Chapman & Hall.
26. Lagacé, R. O. (1979). The HRAF probability sample: Retrospect and prospect. Behavior Science Research, 14, 211–229.
27. Levinson, D., & Malone, M. J. (1980). Toward explaining human culture. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
28. Munroe, R. L., & Munroe, R. H. (1991). Comparative. eld studies:Methodological issues and future possibilities. Behavior Science Research, 25, 155–185.
29. Murdock, G. P. (1934). Our primitive contemporaries. New York: Macmillan.
30. Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas: A summary. Ethnology, 6, 109–236.
31. Murdock, G. P., Ford, C. S., Hudson, A. E., Kennedy, R., Simmons, L. W., & Whiting, J. W. M. (1938). Outline of cultural materials. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
32. Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8, 329–369.
33. Naroll, R. (1962). Data quality control—A new research technique: Prolegomena to a cross-cultural study of culture stress. New York: Free Press.
34. Naroll, R., & Sipes, R. G. (1973). Standard ethnographic sample (2nd ed.). Current Anthropology, 14, 111–140.
35. Naroll, R., Michik, G., & Naroll, F. (1976). Worldwide theory testing. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
36. Nieboer, H. J. (1910). Slavery as an industrial system(2nd ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Nyhoff.
37. Roberts, J. M., Arth, M. J., & Bush, R. R. (1959). Games in culture. American Anthropologist, 61, 597–605.
38. Roberts, J. M., & Barry, H. C., III. (1976). Inculcated traits and game-type combinations. In T. T. Craig (Ed.), The humanistic and mental health aspects of sports, exercise, and recreation (pp. 5–11). Chicago: American Medical Association.
39. Sipes, R. G. (1973). War, sports and aggression: An empirical test of two rival theories. American Anthropologist, 75, 64–86.
40. Stiles, D. A., Gibbons, J. L., & Peters, E. (1993). Adolescents’ views of work and leisure in the Netherlands and the United States of America. Adolescence, 28, 473–489.
41. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. Boston: Ginn.
42. Tylor, E. B. (1889). On a method of investigating the development of institutions applied to the laws of marriage and descent. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 18, 245–272.
43. Valentine, K., Allison, M. T., & Schneider, I. E. (1999). The one-way mirror of leisure research: A need for cross-national social scientific perspectives. Leisure Sciences, 21, 241–246.
44. Virden, R., & Walker, G. (1999). Ethnic/racial and gender variations among meanings given to, and preferences for, the natural environment. Leisure Sciences, 21, 295–308.
45. Walker, G. J. (2000). Response to “The one-way mirror.” Leisure Sciences, 22, xxx–xxx.