Methodological issues in a CMM level 4 implementation

Software Process Improvement and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-50

  Antoniol, Giuliano ^a   Gradara, Sara ^a   Venturi, Gabriele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

Author keywords

CMM; GQM; Process improvement; Software maintenance; Statistical control

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COSTS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL (CMM); CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY (CMU); PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; STATISTICAL CONTROL;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 12844279916     PISSN: 10774866     EISSN: 10991670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.183     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Bach J. 1994. Enough about process: what we need are heros. IEEE Software 12: 96-98.
2. Basili V, Caldiera G, Rombach DH. 1994. The Goal Question Metric Paradigm. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Marciniak JJ (ed.). John Wiley & Sons: New York, pp 528-532.
3. Billings C, Clifton J, Kolkhorst B, Lee E, Wingert WB. 1994. Journey to a mature software process. IBM Systems Journal 33:46-61.
4. Diaz M, Sligo J. 1997. How software process improvement helped motorola. IEEE Software 14: 75-81.
5. Haley T. 1996. Raytheon's experience in software process improvement. IEEE Software 13:33-41.
6. Hall T, Rainer A, Baddoo N, Beecham S. 2001. An empirical study of maintenance issues within process improvement programmes in the software industry. In International Conference on Software Maintenance, Florence, Italy, pp 422-430.
7. Hauser J, Clausing D. 1988. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review (HBR) 3: 63-73.
8. Hersleb J, Goldenson D. 1996. A systematic survey of cmm experience and results. In International Conference on Software Engineering, Monterey, Canada, pp 323-330.
9. Herbsleb J, Zubrow D, Goldenson D, Hayes W, Paulk M. 1997. Software quality and the capability maturity model. ACM 40: 30-40.
10. Humphrey W, Snyder T, Willis R. 1991. Software process improvement at Hughes aircraft. IEEE Software 8:11-23.
11. ISO9000 1998. ISO Standards Compendium - ISO 9000 Quality Management. International Organization for Standardization.
12. ISO/IEC9126 2000. ISO/IEC 9126 FDIS Software Product Quality.
13. Jalote P. 2002. Use of metrics in high maturity organizations. ASQ 4: 7-13.
14. Jones C. 1995. Gaps in sei programs. Software Development 3: 41-48.
15. Mizuno S, Akao Y. 1994. QFD: The Customer-Driven Approach to Quality Planning and Deployment. Productivity Press: Portland, OR.
16. Murugappan M, Keeni G. 2003. Blending cmm and six sigma to meet business goals. IEEE Software 20: 42-48.
17. Park R, Goethert W, Florac W. 1996. Goal-driven software measurement - a guidebook. Technical Report CMU/SEI-96-HB-002, Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA.
18. Paulk M. 1995. How ISO 9001 compares with the CMM. IEEE Software 12: 74-83.
19. Paulk M, Weber C, Curtis B, Chrissis M. 1995. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, USA.
20. Paulk M, Weber C, Garcia S, Chrissis M, Bush M. 1993. Key practices of the capability maturity model version 1.1. Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-25 ESC-TR-93-178, Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA.