Influence of a shared leadership model in creating a school culture of inquiry and collegiality

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-24

  Khourey Bowers, Claudia ^a   Dinko, Richard L ^b   Hart, Raymond G ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stark County Educational Service Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOL CULTURE; SHARED LEADERSHIP MODELS; TEACHERS;

EDUCATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TEACHING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 12444296473     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20038     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Annenberg Institute for School Reform. (n.d.) Educational leadership. Retrieved December 6, 2003 (http://www.annenberginstitute.org/work/leadership_framework.html#practice); Electronic Management and Information Services (EMIS) - Stark County Schools (n.d.) [Data file]. Canton, OH.
2. Elmore, R.F. (1993). The role of local school districts in instructional improvement. In S.H. Fuhrmann (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy (pp. 96-124). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Flora, D.B. & Panter, A.T. (1999). Technical report: Analysis of the psychometric structure of the LSC surveys. Chapel Hill, NC: L.L. Thurstone Psychometric Lab.
4. Fuhrmann, S.H. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S.H. Fuhrmann (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy (pp. 1-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Fullan, M. & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Horizon Research, Inc. (n.d.). Local systemic change: Descriptions and definitions of questionnaire composites (Technical report). Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
7. Horizon Research, Inc. (1999). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement [1999 Teacher questionnaire]. (OMB No. 3145-0136). Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
8. Horizon Research, Inc. (2000, March). Validity and reliability information for the LSC Classroom Observation Protocol [Technical report]. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
9. Jenlink, P.M. & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (2001). Case stories of facilitating professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 705-724.
10. Kohm, B. (2002). Improving faculty conversations. Educational Leadership, 59, 31-33.
11. Lieberman, A. & Grolnick, M. (1997). Networks, reform, and the professional development of teachers. Yearbook (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development), v. 1997, 192-215. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. Lieberman, A. & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers - transforming their world and their work. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Loucks-Horsely, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
14. Lumpe, A., Haney, J., & Czerniak, C. (2000). Assessing teachers' beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275-292.
15. Murphy, C. & Lick, D. (1998). Whole-faculty study groups: A powerful way to change schools and enhance learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: Author.
17. National Science Foundation (n.d.). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement in science grades 6-12. Retrieved November 21, 2003 (http://www.nsf.gov/nsf/nsfpubs/nsf9720.htm#Teacher%20Enhancement).
18. O'Day, J.A. & Smith, M.S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S.H. Fuhrmann (Ed.), Designing coherent educational policy (pp. 250-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Student Performance Data: 1999. [Data file]. Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Education.
20. Supovitz, J.A. & Turner, H.M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980.
21. Tschannen-Moran, M. & Woolfok-Hoy, A. (2002, April). The influence of resources and support on teachers' efficacy beliefs. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
22. Vesilind, E. & Jones, M.G. (2000). Gardens or graveyards: Science education reform and school culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 757-776.
23. Wallace, J. & Nesbit, C. (1996). The emerging role of teacher leaders: Teachers speak. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Issues in science education (pp. 130-139). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
24. Weiss, I., Banilower, E., McMahon, K., & Smith, P. (2001, November). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
25. Weiss, I., Banilower, E., Overstreet, C., & Soar, E. (2002, March). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement (Year Seven Cross-Site Report). Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
26. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1998). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America's schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.