TDFAD approach to high temperature defect assessment and its engineering application

Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition)

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 537-542

  Xuan, Fuzhen ^a   Tu, Shandong ^a   Wang, Zhengdong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHANGHAI FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Creep; Defective structure; High temperature; Safety assessment; Time dependent failure assessment diagram

Indexed keywords

CRACK PROPAGATION; CREEP; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); STRAIN; STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS; STRESSES; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

CREEP RUPTURE; DEFECTIVE STRUCTURES; HIGH TEMPERATURE; J INTEGRAL; SAFETY ASSESSMENT; STEEL 2.25CR1MO; STRESS STRAIN CURVES; TIME DEPENDENT FAILURE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS;

FRACTURE MECHANICS;

EID: 12444293925     PISSN: 10009345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3901/cjme.2004.04.537     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. R5. Assessment procedure for the high temperature response of structures. Procedure R5, Issue 2. Gloucester, UK: Nuclear Electric Ltd, 1997
2. Drubay B, Moulin D, Faidy C, et al. Defect assessment procedure: a French approach. ASME PVP, 1993, 266: 113-118
3. BS 7910: 1999. Guide to methods of assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded structures. London: BSI, 1999
4. Ewald J, Sheng S, Klenk A, et al. Engineering guide to assessment of creep crack initiation on components by two-criteria-diagram. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2001, 78(11, 12): 937-949
5. Dowling A R. Townley C A. The effect of defects on structural failure: a two-criteria approach. Int. J. Pres. Ves. and Piping, 1975, 3(1): 77-107
6. R6. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects. Procedure R6-Revision 4. Gloucester, UK: Nuclear Electric Ltd., 2000
7. Ainsworth R A, Hooton D G, Green G. Failure assessment diagrams for high temperature defect assessment. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1999, 62(1): 95-109
8. Hooton D G, Green D, Ainsworth R A. An R6 type approach for the assessment of creep crack growth initiation in 316L stainless steel test specimens. ASME PVP Conference, Minneapolis, 1994, 287: 129-136
9. Kumar V, German D, Ship C F. An engineering approach for elastic-plastic fracture analysis. EPRI Final Report NP 1931, 1981, 19-20
10. ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, section III - class I components in elevated temperature service. Code Case N47-29. New York: ASME, 1990
11. Marie S, Delaval C. Fatigue and creep-fatigue crack growth in 316 stainless steel cracked plates at 650°C. Int. J. Pres. Ves. and Piping, 2001, 78: 847-857
12. Miller A G. Review of limit loads of structures containing defects. Int. J. Pres. Ves. and Piping, 1988, 32: 197-327
13. ASTM Standards E399-78. Standard test method of plane strain fracture toughness of metallic materials, 1979
14. ASTM E1457-98. Standard test method for measurement of creep crack growth rates in metals. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1998
15. Assire A, Michel B, Raous M. Creep crack initiation and creep crack growth assessments in welded structures. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2001, 206(1): 45-56
16. Ainsworth R A. The initiation of creep crack growth. Int. J. Solids Structures, 1982, 18: 873-881
17. Koichi Y, Masaaki T, Kiyoshi K. The influence of fracture mechanisms on the creep crack growth behaviour of 316 stainless steel. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1997, 57(5): 463-473
18. Miller D A. AGR materials data handbook R66. Nuclear Electric Ltd, 1992
19. Ainsworth R A. The use of a failure assessment diagram for initiation and propagation of defects at high temperatures. Fatigue Fracture Engng Mater Struct, 1993, 16(10): 1091-1108
20. RCC-MR. Design and construction rules for mechanical components of FBR nuclear island. Paris: AFCEN, 1985
21. Pineau A. Assessment procedures for defects in the creep range. In: High Temperature Structural Design, (Larrason L H ed.): ESIS12 London: MEP, 1992, 355-396