Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans

NeuroImage

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 701-706

  Mäkinen, Ville ^a   May, Patrick ^b   Tiitinen, Hannu ^b  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Auditory integration; Brain response; Latency jitter; Magnetoencephalography; Reaction time; Sound detection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; REACTION TIME; RECORDING; SOUND DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 1242338931     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Clynes M. The dynamics of R-M function. Donchin E., Lindsley D.B. Average Evoked Potentials: Methods, Results and Evaluations. 1969;363-374 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. NASA SP-191.
3. Douglas R.J., Koch C., Mahowald M., Martin K.A., Suarez H.H. Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits. Science. 269:1995;981-985.
4. Eddins D.A., Green D.M. Temporal integration and temporal resolution. Moore B.C.J. Hearing. Handbook of Perception and Cognition. second ed. 1995;207-242 Academic Press, San Diego.
5. Freiberg K., Tually K., Crassini B. Use of an auditory looming task to test infants' sensitivity to sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 19:2001;1-10.
6. Garner W.R., Miller G. The masked threshold of pure tones as a function of duration. J. Exp. Psychol. 37:1947;293-303.
7. Ghazanfar A.A., Neuhoff J.G., Logothetis N.K. Auditory looming perception in rhesus monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;15755-15757.
8. Green D.M., Birdsall T.G., Tanner W.P. Signal detection as a function of signal intensity and duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29:1957;523-531.
9. Hanes D., Schall J. Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science. 274:1996;427-430.
10. Hillyard S.A., Squires K.C., Bauer J.W., Lindsay P.H. Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection. Science. 172:1971;1357-1360.
11. Hyde M. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol. Neurootol. 5:1997;281-307.
12. Jaskowski P., Rybarczyk K., Jaroszyk F. The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity. Psychol. Res. 56:1994;59-65.
13. Klein D.J., Depireux D.A., Simon J.Z., Shamma S.A. Robust spectrotemporal reverse correlation for the auditory system: optimizing stimulus design. J. Comput. Neurosci. 9:2000;85-111.
14. Knight R.T., Staines W.R., Swick D., Chao L.L. Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 101:1999;159-178.
15. Lu T., Liang L., Wang X. Neural representations of temporally asymmetric stimuli in the auditory cortex of awake primates. J. Neurophysiol. 85:2001;2364-2380.
16. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. The operation of selective attention at multiple stages of processing: evidence from human and monkey electrophysiology. Gazzaniga M.S. The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Bradford Book. 2000;687-700 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function. 1992;Erlbaum, New Jersey.
18. Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity (MMN): perspectives for application. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 37:2000;3-10.
19. Neuhoff J.G. Perceptual bias for rising tones. Nature. 395:1998;123-124.
20. Palomäki K., Tiitinen H., Mäkinen V., May P., Alku P. Cortical processing of speech sounds and their analogues in a spatial auditory environment. Cogn. Brain Res. 14:2002;294-299.
21. Parasuraman R., Beatty J. Brain events underlying detection and recognition of weak sensory signals. Science. 210:1980;80-83.
22. Parasuraman R., Richer F., Beatty J. Detection and recognition: concurrent processes in perception. Percept. Psychophys. 31:1982;1-12.
23. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials I. The nature of the response. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;186-197.
24. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials II. Stimulus relationships. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;198-210.
25. Rauschecker J.P., Tian B. Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;11800-11806.
26. Sams M., Paavilainen P., Alho K., Näätänen R. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62:1985;437-448.
27. Seifritz E., Neuhoff J.G., Bilecen D., Scheffler K., Mustovic H., Schachinger H., Elefante R., Di Salle F. Neural processing of auditory looming in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;2147-2151.
28. Shamma S. On the role of space and time in auditory processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5:2001;340-348.
29. Shibasaki H., Miyazaki M. Event-related potential studies in infants and children. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9:1992;408-418.
30. Squires K.C., Hilliyard S.A., Lindsay P.H. Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: relation to decision criteria. Percept. Psychophys. 14:1973;265-272.
31. Tesche C.D., Uusitalo M.A., Ilmoniemi R.J., Huotilainen M., Kajola M., Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95:1995;189-200.
32. Tiitinen H., May P., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature. 372:1994;90-92.
33. Uutela K., Hämäläinen M., Somersalo E. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. NeuroImage. 10:1999;173-180.
34. van den Brink W.A.C., Houtgast T. Spectro-temporal integration in signal detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1990;1703-1711.